References

BOS website. FAQ for children and teens. (Accessed October 2014)
Van Beek GC, 2nd edn. Oxford: Wright; 1983
Management of the unerupted maxillary incisors, RCS Eng. 2010.
Garvey MT, Barry HJ, Blake M Supernumerary teeth – an overview of classification, diagnosis and management. J Can Dent Assoc. 1999; 65:612-616
Wiedel AP, Bondemark L Fixed versus removable orthodontic appliances to correct anterior crossbite in the mixed dentition – a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Orthod. 2015; 37:123-127
Orthodontic treatment for posterior crossbites.
Balmer R, Toumba J, Godson J, Duggal M The prevalence of molar incisor hypomineralisation in Northern England and its relationship to socioeconomic status and water fluoridation. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2012; 22:250-257
Gill DS, Lee RT, Tredwin CJ Treatment planning for the loss of first permanent molars. Dent Update. 2001; 28:304-308
A Guideline for the Extraction of First Permanent Molars in Children. RCS. 2009.
Faculty Working Party.
Mandell N, DiBiase A Is early Class III protraction facemask treatment effective? A multicentre, randomized, controlled trial: 15-month follow-up. J Orthod. 2010; 37:149-161
Is early class III protraction facemask treatment effective? A multicentre, randomized, controlled trial: 3-year follow-up. J Orthod. 2012; 39:176-185
Baccetti T, Franchi L, Ratner L, McNamara JA Treatment timing for twin-block therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000; 118:159-170
O'Brien K Early treatment for Class II division 1 malocclusion with the Twin-block appliance: a multi-center, randomized, controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 135:573-579
Thiruvenkatachari B, Harrison J, Worthington H, O'Brien K Early orthodontic treatment for Class II malocclusion reduces the chance on incisal trauma: results of a Cochrane systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015; 148:47-59
Kurol J Infraocclusion of primary molars: an epidemiologic and familial study. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1981; 9:94-102
O'Brien MLondon: HMSO; 1993
Noar J, Portnoy S Dental status of children in a primary and secondary school in rural Zambia. Int Dent J. 1991; 41:142-148

The role of the GDP in assessment and management of the early orthodontic referral

From Volume 43, Issue 8, October 2016 | Pages 706-720

Authors

Andrew MC Flett

BDS, MJDF RCS(Eng), MClinDent(Ortho), MOrth(Eng)

Senior Registrar in Orthodontics, Charles Clifford Dental Hospital, Sheffield and Royal Chesterfield, (andrewflett13@hotmail.com)

Articles by Andrew MC Flett

Jonathan Sandler

BDS (Hons), MSc, PhD, MOrth RCS, FDS RCPS

Consultant Orthodontist, Chesterfield Royal Hospital, Chesterfield, UK

Articles by Jonathan Sandler

Abstract

Many of the orthodontic patients in the UK are treated in early adolescence. This occurs when most of the permanent dentition has erupted and after the general dental practitioner (GDP) has had the opportunity to assess the patient using the index of orthodontic treatment need (IOTN). There are certain types of malocclusion that present before this age and would undoubtedly benefit from earlier referral.

CPD/Clinical Relevance: To describe the malocclusion and dental anomalies that benefit from ‘early’ orthodontic assessment and active intervention.

Article

The majority of orthodontic treatment performed in the UK is undertaken when children are in their early adolescence (12–14 years old).1 The reasons for this are both patient- and health service-related. Most of the permanent dentition is erupted by 12 years of age,2 which makes complete assessment of the clinical situation possible and allows the use of full upper and lower fixed appliances. Other treatment modalities, such as the use of functional appliances, hope to ‘harness’ the growth potential of the child, and improve a moderate to severe sagittal discrepancy. Children are usually actively growing as they reach the final stages of the mixed dentition. Finally, orthodontists in primary care are only paid once for providing treatment for a patient, which may act as a disincentive for earlier intervention. It is the authors' opinion that this has resulted in a system that generally intends that only ‘one bite of the cherry’ is offered for maximum clinical effect and therefore benefit to the patient.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available