References

Thayer MLT, Ali R The dental demolition derby: bruxism and its impact – part 3: repair and reconstruction. Br Dent J. 2022; 232:775-782 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-022-4293-8
Bhanderi S Facts about cracks in teeth. Prim Dent J. 2021; 10:20-27 https://doi.org/10.1177/2050168420980987
Raphael KG, Janal MN, Sirois DA Validity of self-reported sleep bruxism among myofascial temporomandibular disorder patients and controls. J Oral Rehabil. 2015; 42:751-758 https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12310
Lobbezoo F, Ahlberg J, Raphael KG International consensus on the assessment of bruxism: report of a work in progress. J Oral Rehabil. 2018; 45:837-844 https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12663
Manfredini D, Lombardo L, Visentin A, Arreghini A, Siciliani G Correlation between sleep-time masseter muscle activity and tooth wear: an electromyographic study. J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2019; 33:199-204 https://doi.org/10.11607/ofph.2081
American Association of Endodontists. Cracked teeth and vertical root fractures: a new look at a growing problem. https://www.aae.org/specialty/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2022/12/ecfe-2022-edition-FINAL.pdf (accessed April 2025)
Rivera RM, Walton RE Cracking the cracked tooth code: detection and treatment of various longitudinal tooth fractures.Chicago: American Association of Endodontists; 2008
Davis MC, Shariff SS Success and survival of endodontically treated cracked teeth with radicular extensions: a 2-to 4-year prospective cohort. J Endod. 2019; 45:848-855 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2019.03.015
Olivieri JG, Elmsmari F, Miró Q Outcome and survival of endodontically treated cracked posterior permanent teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod. 2020; 46:455-463 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2020.01.006
Sim IGB, Lim T-S, Krishnaswamy G, Chen N-N Decision making for retention of endodontically treated posterior cracked teeth: a 5-year follow-up study. J Endod. 2016; 42:225-229 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.11.011
Kang SH, Kim BS, Kim Y Cracked teeth: distribution, characteristics, and survival after root canal treatment. J Endod. 2016; 42:557-562 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.01.014
Krell KV, Caplan DJ 12-month success of cracked teeth treated with orthograde root canal treatment. J Endod. 2018; 44:543-548 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.12.025

Bruxism and endodontics: how to manage cracked teeth

From Volume 52, Issue 6, June 2025 | Pages 373-380

Authors

Petros Mylonas

BDS, MFDS RCS (Edin), MMedEd, SFHEA (UK, PhD

BDS, MFDS RCS (Edin), MMedEd, SFHEA (UK), PhD, Senior Clinical Lecturer and Specialty Training Registrar in Restorative Dentistry, Cardiff University, University Dental Hospital Wales, Cardiff

Articles by Petros Mylonas

Email Petros Mylonas

Ivy Gitonga

BDS, Dental Foundation Trainee, Chopra and Associates, Canterbury, Kent

Articles by Ivy Gitonga

Kostas Ioannidis

DDS, MSc, PhD, Dip FMS, FHId, Specialist in Endodontics, Assistant Professor in Endodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece

Articles by Kostas Ioannidis

Abstract

Bruxism is a repetitive masticatory muscular activity characterized by the grinding and clenching of teeth and/or thrusting of the mandible. This activity can occur during the day (awake bruxism) or at night (sleep bruxism) and patients can potentially generate mandibular forces of up to 900N. This has been known to crack or break unrestored teeth, indirect restorations and even implant fixtures. This article provides an overview of the endodontic considerations in those who experience bruxism and who have cracked teeth.

CPD/Clinical Relevance: Bruxism can affect tooth structural integrity and pulp vitality, and can compromise tooth survival.

Article

Bruxism is the repetitive masticatory muscular activity characterized by the grinding and clenching of teeth and or thrusting of the mandible.

This activity can occur during the day (awake bruxism) or at night (sleep bruxism) and patients can potentially generate mandibular forces up to 91.7kg (900N), while normal human chewing forces range from 36.4kg (352.3N) for women to 45.7kg (441.5N) in men.1 Patients who have a bruxist habit have been known to generate enough force to crack or break unrestored teeth, indirect restorations and even implant fixtures.1

The teeth most commonly affected by cracking/fracturing owing to excessive occlusal loading are mandibular second molars, mandibular first molars and maxillary premolars, with the least affected being mandibular premolars.2

The International Consensus on Assessment of Bruxism states that bruxism should be considered a risk factor for negative oral health consequences as opposed to a disorder in otherwise healthy individuals.3

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available