References

Dahl BL, Krogstad O, Karlsen K. An alternative treatment of cases with advanced localized attrition. J Oral Rehabil. 1975; 2:209-214
Rochette AL. Attachment of a splint to enamel of lower anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1973; 30:418-423
Banerji S, Sethi A, Dunne SM, Millar BJ. Clinical performance of Rochette bridges used as immediate provisional restorations for single unit implants in general practice. Br Dent J. 2005; 199:771-775
King PA, Foster LV, Yates RJ, Newcombe RG, Garrett MJ. Survival characteristics of 771 resin-retained bridges provided at a UK dental teaching hospital. Br Dent J. 2015; 218:423-428

Technique Tips: Temporary Adhesive Bridges

From Volume 47, Issue 7, July 2020 | Pages 612-613

Authors

Arijit Ray-Chaudhuri

BDS, MFDS RCS(Ed), MJDF RCS(Eng), LLM, AFHEA, FDS RCS(Eng)

Specialist Registrar in Restorative Dentistry, St George's and King's Hospital Trusts, London, UK

Articles by Arijit Ray-Chaudhuri

Emma Ray-Chaudhuri

BDS, MFDS RCS Eng, MPaedDent RCSP Glasg

Specialty Registrar in Paediatric Dentistry, Health Education Kent, Surrey and Sussex

Articles by Emma Ray-Chaudhuri

Frans Banki

BDS, MSc, MRCS(Eng)

Specialty Dentist, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Royal Alexandra Children's Hospital, Brighton, UK

Articles by Frans Banki

Article

Temporary adhesive bridges (TABs) are a short-term fixed solution for missing teeth in the aesthetic zone. They are commonly used for patients who are unwilling or unable to wear a denture or maintain an edentulous space, prior to definitive tooth replacement.

TABs are predominantly recommended for the cosmetic replacement of one or two teeth. They are commonly provided for three to six months, although in many cases the authors have successfully used temporary bridges for more than 12 months. TABs can be used with or without the Dahl concept.1

The authors recommend the use of Rochette style retainers (wings)2 with a 0.7–1.0 mm thickness perforated nickel chromium wing used on either side of the pontic(s) with full lingual or palatal coverage. The exact amount of occlusal, palatal and/or lingual coverage of the abutment teeth depends on the inter-occlusal space available and the choice of the occlusal scheme, ie using the Dahl concept, reorganizing the occlusion, or conforming to the occlusion (Figures 14). For TABs, the authors do not recommend preparation of abutment teeth or use of a rubber dam. A single cantilevered pontic and wing should be avoided for temporary bridges as these tend to debond unpredictably with the use of non-definitive cements.3 This contrasts to the authors' preference for cantilevered bridges with a single wing in definitive adhesive bridges.4 However, wings on both sides of the pontic(s) are unfeasible if an adjacent tooth is compromised or has a crown. In such cases, two wings can be used with a cantilevered pontic, ie double-abutting the retainers (Figure 5).

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available