References

Walmsley AD. Acrylic partial dentures. Dent Update. 2003; 30:424-429 https://doi.org/10.12968/denu.2003.30.8.424
Allen PF, Jepson NJ, Doughty J, Bond S. Attitudes and practice in the provision of removable partial dentures. Br Dent J. 2008; 204 https://doi.org/10.1038/bdj.2007.568
General Dental Council. Preparing for practice – dental team learning outcomes for registration (2015 revised edition). Clinical Learning Outcome 1.14.11. http://www.gdc-uk.org/docs/default-source/quality-assurance/preparing-for-practice-(revised-2015).pdf (accessed December 2022)
Lynch CD, Allen PF. Quality of written prescriptions and master impressions for fixed and removable prosthodontics: a comparative study. Br Dent J. 2005; 198:17-20 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4811947
Publications approval reference: 001559 Issue 3: Preparedness letter for primary dental care 25.03.2020.
Watt DM, MacGregor AR.Bristol: John Wright & Sons Ltd; 1984
The glossary of prosthodontic terms: ninth edition. J Prosthet Dent. 2017; 117:e1-e105 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.12.001
Farrell J.London: Henry Kimpton Publishers; 1971
Frank RP. Direct retainers for distal-extension removable partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1986; 56:562-567 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(86)90422-1
Carr AB, Brown DT., 13th edn. : Mosby; 2015
Brudvik JS, Morris HF. Stress-relaxation testing. Part III: Influence of wire alloys, gauges, and lengths on clasp behavior. J Prosthet Dent. 1981; 46:374-379 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(81)90441-8
Davenport JC, Basker RM, Heath JR Clasp design. Br Dent J. 2001; 190:71-81 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4800887
Chrystie JA. Principles of clasp retention: a review. Aust Dent J. 1988; 33:96-100 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.1988.tb00648.x

Acrylic dentures: fill the gap. Part 1. overview, support, retention, reciprocation and bracing

From Volume 50, Issue 1, January 2023 | Pages 49-52

Authors

Wouter Leyssen

BDS, MJDF, MSc

Specialty Dentist in Restorative Dentistry, Birmingham Community NHS Healthcare Foundation Trust

Articles by Wouter Leyssen

Jasmeet Heran

BDS, MFDS, DCT

Birmingham Dental Hospital

Articles by Jasmeet Heran

AD Walmsley

PhD, MSc, BDS, FDSRCPS

School of Dentistry, The University of Birmingham, St Chad's Queensway, Birmingham B4 6NN, UK

Articles by AD Walmsley

Abstract

Many dental students find the principles of partial denture design difficult to learn. It is also recognized that dentists in general practice within the UK do not always provide sufficient design specification on their laboratory prescription. In that regard, it seems that confusion about how to come up with a suitable denture design persists after graduation. The aim of this series of articles is therefore to review the principles of denture design as applied to mucosal-borne dentures. Part 1 focuses on support, retention, reciprocation and bracing.

CPD/Clinical Relevance: This article reviews the principles of design in relation to mucosal-borne partial dentures.

Article

Acrylic partial dentures are the most common type of removable dentures provided in both general and private practice.1,2 However, there are relatively few published articles that cover acrylic partial denture design.

Denture design is part of the undergraduate curriculum and qualified dentists are presumed to be competent to ‘Assess the need for, design, prescribe and provide biomechanically sound partial and complete dentures’ for their patients.3 While undergraduate training may have provided some basic principles regarding denture design, it is impossible to cover all the possible variations, including number, shape, angulation and distribution of teeth, occlusion, patient preference, soft tissue interference and various other confounding factors.

This variation may be a reason that students find the principles of partial denture design difficult to learn. Often this confusion persists after graduation; it is recognized that dentists in general practice within the UK do not always provide sufficient design specification on their laboratory prescription.2,4 One explanation is that dentists are not confident in applying their knowledge of denture design principles to their partially dentate patients. Perhaps, because undergraduate courses devote much of their time to teaching design principles for cobalt–chromium-based partial dentures rather than acrylic-based partial dentures.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available