References

Miles DA, Lovas JL, Cohen MM. Hemimaxillofacial dysplasia: a newly recognised disorder of facial asymmetry, hypertricosis of the facial skin, unilateral enlargement of the maxilla, and hypoplastic teeth in two patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1987; 64:445-448
Danforth RA, Raymond JM, Abrams AM, Handlers JP. Segmental odontomaxillary dysplasia. Report of eight cases and comparison with hemimaxillofacial dysplasia. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1990; 770:81-85
Prusack N, Pringle G, Scotti V, Chen S. Segmental odontomaxillary dysplasia. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2000; 90:483-488
Kahn M. Basic Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology. 2001; 1
Cahuana A, Gonzalez Y, Palma C. Clinical management of regional odontodysplasia. Pediatr Dent. 2005; 27:34-39
Crawford PJM, Aldred MJ. Regional odontodysplasia: a bibliography. J Oral Pathol Med. 1989; 18:251-263
Magalhaes AC, Pessan JP, Cuhna RF, Delbem ACB. Regional odontodysplasia: case report. J Appl Oral Sci. 2007; 15:(6)465-469
Tervonen SA, Stratmann U, Mokrys K, Reichart PA. Regional odontodysplasia: a review of the literature and report of four cases. Clin Oral Invest. 2004; 8:45-51
Packota GV, Pharoah MJ, Petrikowski CG. Radiographic features of segmental odontomaxillary dysplasia: a study of 12 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1996; 82:577-584
Armstrong C, Napier SS, Boyd RC, Gregg TA. Histopathology of the teeth in segmental odontomaxillary dysplasia, new findings. J Oral Pathol Med. 2004; 33:246-248
Sadeghi EM, Ashrafi MH. Regional odontodysplasia: clinical, pathologic and therapeutic considerations. J Am Dent Assoc. 1981; 102:336-340
Jones CJ, Ford JF. Simultaneous occurrence of segmental odontomaxillary dysplasia and Becker's nevus. J Oral Maxiollfac Surg. 1999; 57:1251-1252
Paticoff K, Marion RW, Shprintzen RJ, Shanske AL, Eisig BS. Hemimaxillofacial dyplasia. A report of 2 cases and a further delineation of the disorder. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1997; 83:484-488
Bhatia SK, Drage N, Cronin AJ, Hunter ML. Case report: segmental odontomaxillary dysplasia – a rare disorder. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2008; 9:(4)245-248

Comparative case report of segmental odontomaxillary dysplasia and regional odontodysplasia

From Volume 41, Issue 9, November 2014 | Pages 825-831

Authors

Stephanie L Clark

BDS, MFDS RCPSG, MPaedDent

Specialist Paediatric Dentist, Glasgow Dental Hospital and School

Articles by Stephanie L Clark

Alison M Cairns

BDS, MSc, MFDS RCS(Ed), MPaedDent, FDS (Paed Dent) RCPSG, DipAcPrac FHEA

Senior Clinical University Teacher/Honorary Consultant, Paediatric Dentistry, Glasgow Dental Hospital and School

Articles by Alison M Cairns

Keith D Hunter

BSc, BDS(Hons), FDS RCS(Ed), PhD, FRCPath

Clinical Senior Lecturer in Oral Pathology, School of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield

Articles by Keith D Hunter

Abstract

The clinical and radiological features of segmental odontomaxillary dysplasia (SOD) are well described but the condition is probably under recognized owing to misdiagnosis as an atypical form of regional odontodysplasia (ROD). Two cases are compared to highlight the differences between SOD and ROD. The clinical, radiographic and histological findings are compared using case reports of a 6-year-old male with SOD and a 4-year-old girl with ROD. Treatment and follow-up for these patients is described, along with a comparative review of the major characteristics of these two rare conditions.

Clinical Relevance: To help the paediatric dentist distinguish between these two rare conditions.

Article

Developmental disorders involving segments of the developing dentition and their associated structures are rare and, consequently, there is potential for confusion to arise. Two such conditions are segmental odontomaxillary dysplasia (SOD) and regional odontodysplasia (ROD).

SOD is a rare unilateral developmental disorder of the maxilla, involving abnormal growth and maturation of the bone, the teeth and covering gingiva. There are specific clinical, radiographic and histological characteristics. The condition was initially reported as hemimaxillofacial dysplasia by Miles et al in 1987.1 This was revised by Danforth et al in 19902 to the current definition which takes better account of the dental findings.

A review of the literature by Prusack et al3 in 2000 reported 26 cases of SOD. They found SOD to be a non-progressive developmental disorder limited to a posterior segment of the maxilla, resulting in:

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available