References

Fillion D. Improving patient comfort with lingual brackets. J Clin Orthod. 1997; 31:689-694
Phan X, Ling PH. Clinical limitations of Invisalign. J Can Dent Assoc. 2007; 73:263-266
Kurz C, Swartz ML, Andreiko C. Lingual orthodontics: a status report. Part 2: Research and development. J Clin Orthod. 1982; 16:735-740
Fujita K. New orthodontic treatment with lingual-bracket mushroom archwire appliance. Am J Orthod. 1979; 76:657-672
Poon KC, Taverne AAR. Lingual orthodontics: a review of its history. Aust J Orthod. 1997; 15:101-104
Gorman CJ. Lingual orthodontics. Dent Clin North Am. 1997; 41:111-125
Creekmore T. Lingual orthodontics – its renaissance. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1989; 96:120-137
Chan EKM, McCrostie S, Petocz P, Darendeliler MA. Profile of lingual orthodontic users in Australia. Aus Dent J. 2007; 52:288-294
Ye L, Kula KS. Status of lingual orthodontics. World J Orthod. 2006; 7:361-368
Huge SA. The customized lingual appliance set-up service (CLASS) system. In: Romano R (ed). Ontario: BC Decker Inc; 1998
Fillion D, Leclerc JF. L'orthodontie linguale: pourquoi est-elle en progrès?. Orthod Fr. 1991; 62:793-801
Hiro T, Takemoto K. Resin core indirect bonding system – improvements of lingual orthodontic treatment. J Jap Orthod Soc. 1998; 57:83-91
Wiechmann D, Rummel V, Thalheim A, Simon JS, Wiechmann L. Customized brackets and archwires for lingual orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003; 124:593-599
Sinclair PM, Cannito MF, Goates LJ, Solomos LF, Alexander CM. Patient responses to lingual appliances. J Clin Orthod. 1986; 20:396-404
Gorman JC, Hilgers JJ, Smith JR. Lingual orthodontics: a status report. J Clin Orthod. 1983; 17:26-35
Årtun J. A post treatment evaluation of multibonded lingual appliances in orthodontics. Eur J Orthod. 1987; 9:204-210
Gorman JC. Treatment of adults with lingual orthodontic appliances. Dent Clin North Am. 1988; 32:589-620
Chaushu S, Becker A, Chaushu G. Lingual orthodontic treatment and absolute anchorage to correct an impacted maxillary canine in an adult. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 134:811-819
Wiechmann D, Schwestka-Polly R, Hohoff A. Herbst appliance in lingual orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 134:439-446
Hong RK, Lee JG, Sunwoo J, Lim SM. Lingual orthodontics combined with orthognathic surgery in a skeletal class III patient. J Clin Orthod. 2000; 34:403-408
Smith JR, Gorman JC, Kurz C, Dunn RM. Key success in lingual therapy. Part 1. J Clin Orthod. 1986; 20:252-261
Caniklioglu C, Öztürk Y. Patient discomfort: a comparison between lingual and labial fixed appliances. Angle Orthod. 2004; 75:86-91
Hohoff A, Stamm T, Goder G, Sauerland CM, Ehmer U, Seifert E. Comparison of 3 bonded lingual appliances by auditive analysis and subjective assessment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003; 124:737-745
Stamm T, Hohoff A, Ehmer U. A subjective comparison of two lingual bracket systems. Eur J Orthod. 2005; 27:420-426
Wiechmann D, Stamm T, Hohoff A. Prediction of oral discomfort and dysfunction in lingual orthodontics: a preliminary report. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 133:359-364
Ling PH. Lingual orthodontics: history, misconceptions and clarification. J Can Dent Assoc. 2005; 71:99-102
Rosvall MD, Fields HW, Ziuchkovski J, Rosenstiel SF, Johnston WM. Attractiveness, acceptability, and value of orthodontic appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 135

Lingual orthodontics: an overview

From Volume 38, Issue 6, July 2011 | Pages 390-395

Authors

Parmjit Singh

Specialist Registrar, The Ipswich Hospital and The Royal London Hospital

Articles by Parmjit Singh

Shirley Cox

BDS(Hons) (Lond), FDS RCS(Eng), MSc(Lond), MOrth RCS(Eng), FDS Orth RCS(Eng)

Consultant Orthodontist, Barts and The London NHS Trust, London, UK

Articles by Shirley Cox

Abstract

As adults increasingly seek orthodontic treatment, a growth has been witnessed in the demand for aesthetic orthodontics, the ultimate of which are appliances bonded to the lingual surfaces of the teeth. Development has spanned 30 years and many of the initial challenges faced with this approach have now been overcome. An overview is provided on the development of lingual appliances from conception through to the current systems available. Lingual orthodontics is not for every patient seeking treatment and therefore the indications and contra-indications are discussed, together with the advantages and disadvantages of this increasingly popular approach.

Clinical Relevance: Patients are increasingly asking dental professional about lingual appliances.

Article

Most orthodontists would report that, in recent years, there has been a marked increase in the number of adults, particularly females,1 seeking orthodontic treatment. Tooth-coloured brackets have become widely available in response to the patient's desire for discreet treatment. Although plastic and porcelain brackets reduce the visual presence of the appliance, they are nevertheless still visible and this remains a problem for some patients. Other systems, such as Invisalign (Align Technology Inc, San Jose, USA), have been promoted as effective alternatives. However, their moderate aesthetic appeal and clinical limitations are well documented.2 Lingual appliances are unique in this respect as they provide the ultimate in aesthetics by attachment to the lingual surface of the teeth (Figure 1).

This article reviews the development and challenges of lingual appliances, the clinical procedure, treatment considerations, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of lingual appliances. It will provide readers with information that they can pass on to their patients who may be seeking an orthodontic referral for lingual appliances.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available