References

Ericson S, Kurol J. Radiographic assessment of maxillary canine eruption in children with clinical signs of eruption disturbance. Eur J Orthod. 1986; 8:133-140 https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/8.3.133
Dachi SF, Howell FV. A survey of 3,874 routine full-mouth radiographs. II. A study of impacted teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1961; 14:1165-1169 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(61)90204-3
Mossey PA, Campbell HM, Luffingham JK. The palatal canine and the adjacent lateral incisor: a study of a west of Scotland population. Br J Orthod. 1994; 21:169-174 https://doi.org/10.1179/bjo.21.2.169
Bishara SE. Impacted maxillary canines: a review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992; 101:159-171 https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(92)70008-X
Brin I, Becker A, Shalhav M. Position of the maxillary permanent canine in relation to anomalous or missing lateral incisors: a population study. Eur J Orthod. 1986; 8:12-16 https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/8.1.12
Peck S, Peck L, Kataja M. The palatally displaced canine as a dental anomaly of genetic origin. Angle Orthod. 1994; 64:249-156
Walker L, Enciso R, Mah J. Three-dimensional localization of maxillary canines with cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005; 128:418-423 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.04.033
Stivaros N, Mandall NA. Radiographic factors affecting the management of impacted upper permanent canines. J Orthod. 2000; 27:169-173 https://doi.org/10.1093/ortho/27.2.169
Ericson S, Kurol J. Resorption of maxillary lateral incisors caused by ectopic eruption of the canines. A clinical and radiographic analysis of predisposing factors. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988; 94:503-513 https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(88)90008-x
Liu DG, Zhang WL, Zhang ZY Localization of impacted maxillary canines and observation of adjacent incisor resorption with cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008; 105:91-98 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.01.030
Ericson S, Kurol J. Radiographic examination of ectopically erupting maxillary canines. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1987; 91:483-492 https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(87)90005-9
Brown NL, Sandy JR. Spontaneous improvement in position of canines from apparently hopeless positions. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2001; 11:64-68 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-263x.2001.00233.x
Kindelan J, Cook P. The ectopic maxillary canine: a case report. Br J Orthod. 1998; 25:179-180 https://doi.org/10.1093/ortho/25.3.179
Guidelines for the use of radiographs in clinical orthodontics. 2015. https://www.bos.org.uk/BOS-Homepage/News-Publications/Orthodontic-Radiographs-Guidelines (accessed February 2023)
British Orthodontic Society. Patient information leaflet: impacted canines. 2019. https://view.publitas.com/british-orthodontic-society/impactedcanninesjune2019/page/1 (accessed February 2023)

A cautionary tale of two canines: a case report

From Volume 50, Issue 3, March 2023 | Pages 187-190

Authors

Sophie Hoare

BChD, MFDS RCS Ed

Dental Core Trainee 1, Restorative and OMFS, Aberdeen Dental Institute and Hospital and Aberdeen Royal Infirmary

Articles by Sophie Hoare

Email Sophie Hoare

Colin Larmour

BDS, MSc, MOrth. FDSRCPS, FDS (Orth)

Post Dental Core Trainee Fellow, OMFS Department, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee

Articles by Colin Larmour

Abstract

This orthodontic case report highlights the unpredictable behaviour of ectopic maxillary permanent canines. An 11-year-old male patient had bilateral ectopic maxillary canine teeth that were in high positions and initially left in situ and monitored. During orthodontic treatment, there was rapid spontaneous eruption of both teeth with resulting resorption to an adjacent lateral incisor. This case report details the clinical findings and progress of treatment and management. A review of the literature reinforces the importance of maintaining regular radiographic review to assess for migration of ectopic teeth, and to ensure appropriate treatment planning and assessment of potential complications.

CPD/Clinical Relevance: This report highlights the need for regular radiographic review of impacted canines in younger patients.

Article

Maxillary impacted canines have a high developmental position and long path of eruption, with canine impaction and non-eruption being a common problem. The incidence of impacted canines is well reported in the literature at between 1% and 3% of the population.1,2 Impaction is more common in females, with a ratio of 7:3, with 8% of cases being reported as bilateral impactions.3,4 The majority of the literature states that impacted canines are most commonly found to be palatally positioned, with reports varying between 41% and 85%.1 The presence of a lateral incisor seems to be important for eruption guidance of the canine, with a higher incidence of canine impaction when the lateral incisor is absent or diminuitive.5 Canine impaction is also more common with Class 2 division 2 malocclusions.3,6 It is important to establish the location of impacted maxillary canines as part of the orthodontic assessment and treatment planning process, as well as the presence of any associated pathology. The position of the impacted canine will determine the prognosis for, and complexity of, alignment.5

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available