References

Van Noort R., 3rd edn. London: Mosby Elsevier; 2007
Roeters JJ, Shortall ACC, Opdam NJM. Can a single composite resin serve all purposes?. Br Dent J. 2005; 199:73-79
Christensen GJ. Bonding to dentin and enamel where does it stand in 2005?. J Am Dent Assoc. 2005; 136:1299-1302
Perdigão J. Dentin bonding – variables related to the clinical situation and the substrate treatment. Dent Materials. 2010; 26:24-37
Prati C, Pashley DH. Dentin wetness, permeability, thickness and bond strength of adhesive systems. Am J Dentistry. 1992; 5:33-38
Banerjee A, Watson TF., 9th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011
Banerjee A, Watson TF, Kidd EA. Dentine caries: take it or leave it?. Dent Update. 2000; 27:272-276
Yoshiyama M, Tay FR, Doi J Bonding of self-etch and total-etch adhesives to carious dentin. J Dent Res. 2002; 81:556-560
Senawongse P, Srihanon A, Muangmingsuk A, Harnirattisai C. Effect of dentine smear layer on the performance of self-etching adhesive systems: a micro-tensile bond strength study. J Biomed Materials Res Part B, Appl Biomaterials. 2010; 94:212-221
Nakabayashi N, Nakamura M, Yasuda N. Hybrid layer as a dentin-bonding mechanism. J Esthet Dent. 1991; 3:133-138
De Munck J, Vargas M, Iracki J One-day bonding effectiveness of new self-etch adhesives to bur-cut enamel and dentin. Oper Dentistry. 2005; 30:39-49
Nakabayashi N. Adhesive bonding with 4-META. Oper Dentistry. 1992; 125-130
Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res. 2004; 83:454-458
De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res. 2005; 84:118-132
Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL Dental adhesives and adhesive performance. In: Curtis R, Watson TF (eds). Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing; 2008
Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Poitevin A Relationship between bond-strength tests and clinical outcomes. Dent Materials. 2010; 26:100-121
Shirai K, De Munck J, Yoshida Y Effect of cavity configuration and aging on the bonding effectiveness of six adhesives to dentin. Dent Materials. 2005; 21:110-124

Contemporary adhesive bonding: bridging the gap between research and clinical practice

From Volume 38, Issue 7, September 2011 | Pages 439-449

Authors

DJB Green

BSc(Hons)

Dental Student, Restorative Dentistry, Unit of Conservative Dentistry, King's College London Dental Institute at Guy's Hospital, KCL, London, UK

Articles by DJB Green

A Banerjee

BDS, MSc, PhD, FDS(Rest Dent) FDS RCS(Eng), FHEA

Department of Conservative Dentistry, Floor 26, Guy's Tower, King's College London Dental Institute at Guy's, King's College and St Thomas' Hospitals, London Bridge, London, SE1 9RT, UK

Articles by A Banerjee

Abstract

The dawn of minimally invasive dentistry has led to the development of materials which rely on the use of effective adhesion to bond to remaining tooth tissue. Successful adhesive bonding is dependent upon appreciating the quality of the dental substrate, appropriate clinical handling of the material and patient, together with an appreciation of the chemistry of the adhesive. This paper outlines the current status of contemporary bonding, with particular emphasis on translating laboratory-based evidence into clinical practice. Using laboratory-based evidence, the ability of a bond to achieve a seal to enamel appears to be the best predictor of clinical performance.

Clinical Relevance: This article discusses the issues raised when translating research data about adhesive bonding from the laboratory to clinical dental practice.

Article

The term adhesion is defined as ‘the force that binds two dissimilar molecules together when they are brought into intimate contact’.1

The evolution of restorative materials has seen the dentist's repertoire shift towards materials which are dependent on reliable adhesive bonding, inherent strength and aesthetics, namely the resin-based adhesive materials.2 These require a mechanism to allow adhesion to remaining tooth tissue because they lack the inherent chemical self-adhesive capacity of materials like glass ionomer cements. In comparison to enamel bonding, dentine bonding has had a more problematic development, with clinically adequate adhesion achieved later than that to enamel. Despite making important advances, dentine bonding still has many hurdles to overcome with respect to the water content, structural heterogeneity of the substrate and the long-term stability of the bond. Nevertheless, the fact that adhesives can be placed at all in such a hostile environment and function with their intended purpose speaks wonders for the modern innovations and developments in the field of adhesive dentistry.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available