References

Fine L, Robinson J, Barnhart G. Absence or major loss of part of the external ear and its correction. J Prosthet Dent. 1974; 31:313-322
Toleth H. A hierarchy of values in the design and construction of the ear. Clin Plast Surg. 1990; 17:193-207
Tanzer RC. Total reconstruction of the auricle: evolution of a plan of treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1971; 47:523-533
Parel SM. Diminishing dependence on adhesives for retention of facial prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent. 1980; 43:552-560
Tjellstrom A, Lindsrom J, Nylen O, Albrektsson T, Branemark P-I, Nero H, Biggerson B. The bone anchored auricular prosthesis. Laringoscope. 1981; 90:811-815
Tjellstrom A. Reconstructive surgery for deformities of the ear: osseointegrated implants for replacement of absent or defective ears. Clin Plast Surg. 1990; 17:355-366
Furnas DN. Complications of surgery of the external ear. Clin Plast Surg. 1990; 17:305-318
Wilkes GH, Wolfaardt JF. Osseointegrated alloplastic versus autogenous ear reconstruction: criteria for treatment selection. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994; 93:967-979
Brent B. Complications of auricular reconstruction – avoidance and management, 2nd edn. In: Goldwyn RM (ed). Boston: Little Brown; 1984
Watson RM, Coward TJ, Forman GH, Moss JP. Considerations in treatment planning for implant supported ear prosthesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1993; 8:688-694
Roberts AC(ed). London: Kimpton; 1971
Barron Robert R Certified Clinical Anaplastologist. Specializing in Prosthetic Replacement of Facial and Digital Anatomy.
Brown Kenneth E Fabrication of ear prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent. 1969; 21:670-676

Fabrication of an auricular prosthesis: a case report

From Volume 38, Issue 6, July 2011 | Pages 414-418

Authors

Nayana Prabhu

MDS

Reader, Department of Prosthodontics, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal-576104, Karnataka, India

Articles by Nayana Prabhu

Sandeep Kumar

MDS

Reader, Department of Prosthodontics, Surendera Dental College and Research Institute, Sriganganagar-335001, Rajasthan, India

Articles by Sandeep Kumar

Seema Gupta

MDS

Reader, Department of Orthodontics, Surendera Dental College and Research Institute, Sriganganagar-335001, Rajasthan, India

Articles by Seema Gupta

Abstract

The fabrication of ear prosthesis is considered by many prosthetists to be one of the more difficult replacements in maxillofacial reconstruction. The severe undercuts and pronounced convolutions of the ear's surface present a challenge in simulating a natural proportioned prosthesis. The mould for the ear is generally made by creating a three surface die to reproduce the unique configuration adequately and to allow retrieval of the finished prosthesis without damage. This article presents an outlined procedure in the basic fabrication of a prosthetic ear by a conventional technique where the wax pattern is fabricated from the impression of an individual with a similarly proportioned ear.

Clinical Relevance: Fabricating an auricular prosthesis may be part of the work of a maxillofacial department.

Article

Absence of all or part of the external ear may be either acquired (surgical resection or trauma) or congenital (microtia with hemifacial microsomia). To make an informed choice between autogenous surgical reconstruction and wearing a prosthetic ear retained by implants or skin contact adhesives, the patient should receive guidance and advice from an expert team committed to optimal care.1–9

At present, a satisfactory solution may be achieved with the fabrication of a prosthetic ear that copies the normal contralateral ear. With congenital defects, such as microtia, where often one ear is missing, existing facial asymmetry presents difficulty in determinig the size and location of an artificial ear that will maintain facial harmony. However, the success of the prosthesis depends upon the maxillofacial technician's artistry and ability to copy the normal contralateral ear. This is achieved using anthropometric measurements and visual assessment.10–12 An artificial auricular/ear prosthesis restores a portion of, or the entire, outer ear. The artificial ear or auricular prosthesis provides a form of rehabilitation when surgical reconstruction is not viable or not preferred by the patient. Artificial ear prostheses can be attached to the patient, either via a skin adhesive or osseointegrated craniofacial implants, or by a spectacle. The artificial ear prosthetics are made of a medical silicone or acrylic, which is coloured to match the natural ear skin tissue. The prosthetic ear normally improves hearing by about 20%13 and will retain spectacles, and a hearing aid, if needed. It also serves as a great psychological benefit in the rehabilitation of the patient.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available