References

London: Public Health England; 2013
Milsom KM, Tickle M, King D. Does the dental profession know how to care for the primary dentition?. Br Dent J. 2003; 195:301-303
Levine RS, Pitts NB, Nugent ZJ. The fate of 1,587 unrestored carious deciduous teeth: a retrospective general dental practice based study from northern England. Br Dent J. 2002; 193:99-103
Tickle M, Milsom KM, King D, Kearney-Mitchell P, Blinkhorn AS. The fate of carious primary teeth of children who regularly attend the general dental services. Br Dent J. 2002; 192:219-223
Stephenson J, Chadwick BL, Playle RA, Treasure ET. A competing risk survival analysis model to assess the efficacy of filling carious primary teeth. Caries Res. 2010; 44:285-293
Tickle M, Threlfall AG, Pilkington L, Milsom KM, Duggal MS, Blinkhorn AS. Approaches taken to the treatment of young children with carious primary teeth: a national cross-sectional survey of general dental practitioners and paediatric specialists in England. Br Dent J. 2007; 203 https://doi.org/10.1038/bdj.2007.570
Innes NP, Stirrups DR, Evans DJ, Hall N, Leggate MA. A novel technique using preformed metal crowns for managing carious primary molars in general practice – a retrospective analysis. Br Dent J. 2006; 200:451-454
The Hall Technique: a pilot trial of a novel use of preformed metal crowns for managing carious primary teeth. 2000. http://www.scottishdental.org/pbrn/research/papers/rt03.htm
Innes NP, Evans DJ, Stirrups DR. Sealing caries in primary molars: randomized control trial, 5-year results. J Dent Res. 2011; 90:1405-1410
Chadwick BL, Evans DJ. Restoration of class II cavities in primary molar teeth with conventional and resin modified glass ionomer cements: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2007; 8:14-21
Santamaria RM, Innes NP, Machiulskiene V, Evans DJ, Splieth CH. Caries management strategies for primary molars: 1-yr randomized control trial results. J Dent Res. 2014; 93:1062-1069
Innes NP, Marshman Z, Vendan RE. A group of general dental practitioners' views of preformed metal crowns after participation in the Hall Technique clinical trial: a mixed-method evaluation. Prim Dent Care. 2010; 17:33-37
Santamaria RM, Innes NP, Machiulskiene V, Evans DJ, Alkilzy M, Splieth CH. Acceptability of different caries management methods for primary molars in a RCT. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2014; https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.12097.15
Bell SJ, Morgan AG, Marshman Z, Rodd HD. Child and parental acceptance of preformed metal crowns. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2010; 11:(5)218-224
Threlfall AG, Pilkington L, Milsom KM, Blinkhorn AS, Tickle M. General dental practitioners' views on the use of stainless steel crowns to restore primary molars. Br Dent J. 2005; 199:453-455
Page LA, Boyd DH, Davidson SE, McKay SK, Thomson WM, Innes NP. Acceptability of the Hall Technique to parents and children. N Z Dent J. 2014; 110:12-17
Gilchrist F, Morgan AG, Farman M, Rodd HD. Impact of the Hall Technique for preformed metal crown placement on undergraduate paediatric dentistry experience. Eur J Dent Educ. 2013; 17:e10-e15 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0579.2012.00751
Ricketts D, Lamont T, Innes NP, Kidd E, Clarkson JE. Operative caries management in adults and children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 3 https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003808.pub3
Innes N, Evans D.: University of Dundee; 2010
van der Zee V, van Amerongen WE. Short communication: Influence of preformed metal crowns (Hall Technique) on the occlusal vertical dimension in the primary dentition. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2010; 11:225-227
Innes NPT, Clarkson JE, Speed C, Douglas GVA, Maguire A The FiCTION dental trial protocol – filling children's teeth: indicated or not?. BMC Oral Health. 2013; 13 https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-13-25

An overview of preformed metal crowns part 2: the hall technique

From Volume 42, Issue 10, December 2015 | Pages 939-944

Authors

Amy C Hyde

BDS

Dental Core Trainee 2 in Paediatric Dentistry, Department of Paediatric Dentistry, Charles Clifford Dental Hospital, Claremont Crescent, Sheffield, S10 2TA, UK.

Articles by Amy C Hyde

Helen J Rogers

BDS, MJDF RCS(Eng), PGDipConSed, MClinRes, MPaed Dent RCS(Eng)

Academic Clinical Fellow in Paediatric Dentistry, Unit of Oral Health and Development, School of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, Claremont Crescent, Sheffield, S10 2TA, UK.

Articles by Helen J Rogers

Haris A Batley

BDS, MFDS

Specialty Registrar in Orthodontics, Glasgow Dental Hospital, Glasgow, G2 3JZ

Articles by Haris A Batley

Annie G Morgan

BDS, MFDS, FDS(Paeds)

Consultant in Paediatric Dentistry, Department of Paediatric Dentistry, Charles Clifford Dental Hospital, 76 Wellesley Road, Sheffield, S10 2SZ

Articles by Annie G Morgan

Chris Deery

BDS, MSc, FDS RCS Ed, PhD, FDS (Paed Dent), RCS Ed, FDS RCS Eng, FHEA

Professor/Honorary Consultant in Paediatric Dentistry, School of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield

Articles by Chris Deery

Abstract

Part 2 of this series of two articles addresses the Hall Technique for preformed metal crowns. It will discuss the need for an effective child and dentist friendly method to restore carious primary molars. The technique is described in detail and the evidence for its effectiveness and acceptance by children, parents, dentists and dental educators is presented.

CPD/Clinical Relevance: Dentists and dental care professionals should be aware of the evidence to support the adoption of the Hall Technique.

Article

In the previous paper the indications, evidence and use of the ‘conventional technique’ for placing preformed metal crowns (PMCs) were described. This second article on the use of PMCs will discuss the Hall Technique. In England, 27.9% of 5-year-olds have experience of dentinal caries at an epidemiological level.1 More significantly, the Care Index (the percentage of teeth which require restoration, which are restored) is only 11.2%. The true prevalence is of course much higher, as a thorough clinical examination supported by radiographs would detect many more lesions, at a time when they would be more likely to result in a successful restoration because the caries would be less advanced than those presenting later, when the carious teeth are unrestorable. Reasons suggested for a lack of restoration of primary teeth include:

Furthermore, the success of restorations placed in primary dental care has previously been questioned in a retrospective case note study.4 Conversely, a much larger cohort study has clearly demonstrated, in 2,654 British children aged 4–5 years at baseline, that the survival of restored primary molar teeth is much better than for unrestored molars.5

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available