References

Ricketts DNJ, Tait CE, Higgins AJ Tooth preparation for post-retained restorations. Br Dent J. 2005; 198:463-471
Hunter AJ, Feiglin B, Williams JF Effects of post placement on endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1989; 62:166-172
Standlee JP, Caputo AA, Holcombe JP The Dentatus screw: comparative stress analysis with other endodontic dowel designs. J Oral Rehab. 1982; 9:23-33
Torbjorner A A literature review on the prosthetic treatment of structurally compromised teeth. Int J Prosthodont. 2004; 17:369-376
Heydecke G, Peters MC The restoration of endodontically treated, single-rooted teeth with cast or direct posts and cores: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2002; 87:380-386
Ferrari M, Vichi A, Mannocci F, Mason PN Retrospective study of the clinical performance of fiber posts. Am J Dent. 2000; 13:9B-13B
Fredriksson M, Astback J, Pamenius M, Arvidson K A retrospective study of 236 patients with teeth restored by carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts. J Prosthet Dent. 1998; 80:151-157
Bolla M, Muller-Bolla M, Borg C, Lupi-Pegurier L, Laplanche O, Leforestier E Root canal posts for the restoration of root filled teeth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2007; (Issue 1)
Rasimick BJ, Wan J, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS A review of failure modes in teeth restored with adhesively luted endodontic dowels. J Prosthodont. 2010; 19:639-646
Rosen H Operative procedures on mutilated endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1961; 11:973-986
Morgano SM, Rodrigues AHC, Sabrosa CE Restoration of endodontically treated teeth. Dent Clin N Am. 2004; 48:397-416
Sorensen JA, Engleman MJ Effect of post adaptation on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1990; 64:419-424
Ng CC, Dumbrigue HB, Al-Bayat MI, Griggs JA, Wakefield CW Influence of remaining coronal tooth structure location on the fracture resistance of restored endodontically treated anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 2006; 95:290-296
Milot P, Stein RS Root fracture in endodontically treated teeth related to post selection and crown design. J Prosthet Dent. 1992; 68:428-435
Jotkowitz A, Samet N Rethinking ferrule – a new approach to an old dilemma. Br Dent J. 2010; 209:25-33
Al-Wahadni A, Gutteridge DL An in vitro investigation into the effects of retained coronal dentine on the strength of a tooth restored with a cemented post and partial core restoration. Int Endod J. 2002; 35:913-918
Tan PL, Aquilino SA, Gratton DG In vitro fracture resistance of endodontically treated central incisors with varying ferrule heights and configurations. J Prosthet Dent. 2005; 93:331-336
Gargiulo A, Wentz F, Orban F Dimensions and relations of the dentogingival junction in humans. J Periodont. 1961; 32:261-267
Abbott PV Incidence of root fractures and methods used for post removal. Int Endod J. 2002; 35:63-67
Siqueira JF Aetiology of root canal treatment failure: why well-treated teeth can fail. Int Endod J. 2001; 34:1-10
Zuolo ML, Ferreira MOF, Gutmann JL Prognosis of periradicular surgery: a clinical prospective study. Int Endod J. 2000; 33:91-98
Ng YL, Mann V, Gulabivala K A prospective study of the factors affecting outcomes of non-surgical root canal treatment: part 1: periapical health. Int Endod J. 2011; 44:583-609
Friedman S Considerations and concepts of case selection in the management of post-treatment endodontic disease (treatment failure). Endod Topics. 2002; 1:54-78
Saunders WP, Saunders EM Coronal leakage as a cause of failure in root-canal therapy: a review. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1994; 10:105-108
Fox K, Gutteridge DL An in vitro study of coronal microleakage in root canal-treated teeth restored by the post and core technique. Int Endod J. 1997; 30:361-368
Fernandes A, Dessai G Factors affecting the fracture resistance of post-core reconstructed teeth: a review. Int J Prosthodont. 2001; 14:355-363
Smith BJ Removal of fractured posts using ultrasonic vibration: an in vivo study. J Endod. 2001; 27:632-634
Gomes APM, Kubo CH, Santos DR, Padhila RQ The influence of ultrasound on the retention of cast posts cemented with different agents. Int Endod J. 2001; 34:93-99
Fuss Z, Trope M Root perforations: classification and treatment choices based on prognostic factors. Endod Dental Traumatol. 1996; 12:255-264
Daoudi MF Microscopic management of endodontic procedural errors: perforation repair. Dent Update. 2001; 28:176-180
Regan JD, Witherspoon DE, Foyle DM Surgical repair of root and tooth perforations. Endod Topics. 2005; 11:152-178
Torabinejad M, Chivian N Clinical applications of mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod. 1999; 25:197-205
Parirokh M, Torabinejad M Mineral trioxide aggregate: a comprehensive literature review – Part III: Clinical applications, drawbacks, and mechanism of action. J Endod. 2010; 36:400-413
Main C, Mirazayan N, Shabahang S, Torabinejad M Repair of root perforations using mineral trioxide aggregate: a long-term study. J Endod. 2004; 30:80-83

‘the last post?’: assessment of the failing post-retained crown

From Volume 41, Issue 5, June 2014 | Pages 386-394

Authors

Hannah P Beddis

BChD(Hons) (Leeds), MJDF RCS(Eng)

Specialty Registrar in Restorative Dentistry and Acute Dental Care

Articles by Hannah P Beddis

Nnaemeka Okechukwu

BDS, MDentSci (Leeds)

General Dental Practitioner, Abuja, Nigeria

Articles by Nnaemeka Okechukwu

Brian R Nattress

BChD, PhD, MRD RCS, FDS RCS(Edin)

Consultant in Restorative Dentistry, Leeds Dental Institute, Clarendon Way, Leeds LS2 9LU, UK

Articles by Brian R Nattress

Abstract

Failure of a post-retained restoration can provide a challenge to the general dental practitioner (GDP) in terms of diagnosis, treatment planning and communication with the patient. The cause of failure must be identified, and a thorough assessment of the restoration, remaining tooth and its functional and aesthetic demands carried out in order to plan treatment to provide the most reliable result.

Clinical Relevance: This article discusses the assessment of failing post-retained crowns, with discussion of reasons for failure, thereby assisting the GDP in decision-making and treatment planning for such teeth.

Article

Posts provide a means of anchoring the core in endodontically treated teeth where there is inadequate coronal tooth structure to provide retention and support for the restoration.1 It was originally thought that the placement of a post strengthened the endodontically treated tooth; this is now known not to be the case: indeed, preparation for a post weakens the tooth.1,2 The use of active, threaded posts, such as the Dentatus screw, is associated with increased stresses and root fracture,3 particularly with a tapered design where there is an additional ‘wedging’ effect into the post space.

The failing post-retained crown can present a real challenge to the dental practitioner, and the decision as to whether to attempt re-restoration is not always straightforward. This article aims to discuss common reasons for failure of the post-retained crown and the factors which must be considered prior to treatment planning.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available