References

Poyser NJ, Porter RWJ, Briggs PFA, Chana HS, Kelleher MGD The Dahl Concept: past, present and future. Br Dent J. 2005; 198:669-676
Thornton LJ Anterior guidance: group function/canine guidance. A literature review. J Prosthet Dent. 1990; 64:(4)479-482
Weston JF Predictable nanohybrid composite systems and techniques for anterior and posterior direct restorations. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2013; 34:8-12

Composite edge bonding – the reverse triangle technique

From Volume 43, Issue 1, January 2016 | Pages 95-97

Authors

Tif Qureshi

President, The British Academy of Cosmetic Dentistry

Articles by Tif Qureshi

Article

Composite has seen a strong renaissance in recent times with a large variety of materials appearing on the market packed with claimed improvements in handling strength and appearance. We do not need scientific data to appreciate that the latter claim is true. Appearance and the ability to blend composite to tooth structure certainly is better than materials of earlier generations. Much of this is down to the material properties, meaning that layering techniques can be simpler. Simplicity brings many benefits not just to the dentist but very much also to the patient. This is because many dentists in the past have not had the confidence to lengthen teeth with composite and instead have used porcelain.

Now the consequences of this are far reaching, because of the biological sacrifice required, the actual cost and, very importantly, the fact that many patients cannot afford it and, as a result, suffer further tooth substance loss (TSL) because there seems to be no simple solution and, as a result, many patients are simply left with their teeth wearing.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available