References

Strategy for Modernising Prison Services for Prisoners in England.London: Department of Health; 2003
Statutory Instrument No 3361. The National Health Service (General Dental Services Contracts) Regulations. 2005;
Reforming Prison Dental Services in England. A Good Practice Guide.London: Department of Health; 2005
Provider Handbook.: Care Quality Commission; 2015
Statutory Instrument No 3477. The National Health Service (Dental Charges) Regulations. 2005;
Categorisation and Recategorisation of Adult Male Prisoners. PSI 40/2011.London: Ministry of Justice; 2011
Statutory Instrument No 728. The Prison Rules. 1999;
A Survey of Dental Services in Adult Prisons in England and Wales.London: Public Health England; 2014
Harvey S, Anderson B, Cantore S, King E, Malik F. Reforming Prison Dental Services in England – a Guide to Good Practice.London: Department of Health/Office of Public Management; 2005
The Status of Prison Dentistry in England and Wales.: National Association for Prison Dentistry United Kingdom (NAPDUK); 2013
Mollen E, Stover L, Jurgen H, Gahterer R. Health in Prisons; a WHO Guide to the Essentials in Prisoner Health.: WHO; 2007
Public Health Functions to be Exercised by the NHS Commissioning Board.London: Department of Health; 2012
Walsh T, Tickle M, Milsom K, Buchanan K, Zoitopoulos L. An investigation of the nature of research into dental health in prisons: a systematic review. Br Dent J. 2008; 204:683-689
Provider Handbook: Health and Social Care in Prisons and Young Offender Institutions, and Health Care in Immigration Removal Centres.London: Care Quality Commission; 2015
Heidari E, Dickinson C, Wilson R, Fiske J. Oral health of remand prisoners in HMP Brixton, London. Br Dent J. 2007; 202:1-6
Osborn M, Butler T, Barnard PD. Oral health status of prison inmates – New South Wales, Australia. Aust Dent J. 2003; 48:34-38
Bolin K, Jones D. Oral health needs of adolescents in a juvenile detention facility. J Adolesc Health. 2006; 38:755-757
Marshall T, Simpson S, Stevens A. Health care in prisons: a health care needs assessment. J Public Health Med. 23:198-204
Jones CM, Woods K, Neville J, Whittle JG. Dental health of prisoners in the north west of England in 2000: literature review and dental health survey results. Community Dent Health. 2005; 22:113-117
Christensen GJ. Providing oral care for the aging patient. J Am Dent Assoc. 2007; 138:239-242
What is Known About the Oral Health of Older People in England and Wales? A review of oral health surveys of older people. Publications gateway number: 2015540.London: Public Health England; 2015
Delivering Better Oral Health, 3rd edn. London: Public Health England; 2014
Oral Health Foundation. Dental Care for Older People. 2015. https://www.dentalhealth.org/tell-me-about/topic/sundry/dental-care-for-older-people (Accessed 10/04/2017)
Strategy for Modernising Dental Services for Prisoners in England.: Department of Health and HM Prison Service; 2003
Mental health of adults in contact with the criminal justice system. Nice Guideline (NG66). 2017. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng66 (Retrieved 24/8/2017)
The Mental Health Act 1983. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1983/20/section/47 (Retrieved 10/8/2017)
The Mental Capacity Act 2005. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2005/9/section/4 (Retrieved 10/8/2017)
Guidelines for the Appointment of Dentists with Special Interests (DwSIs) in Prison Dentistry.London: NHS Primary Care Contracting/Faculty of General Dental Practice (UK); 2007
Dental Foundation Training (DFT) curriculum. Committee of Postgraduate Dental Deans and Directors (COPDEND) UK. 2006;
Preparing for Practice, Dental Team Learning Outcomes for Registration.London: General Dental Council; 2015
Emergency Dental Care. Scottish Dental Clinical Effectiveness Programme 2007. http://www.sdcep.org.uk/published-guidance/emergency-dental-care/ (Retrieved 24/8/2017)

Providing dental care in prisons

From Volume 46, Issue 5, May 2019 | Pages 428-437

Authors

Paul Howard

BDS, DPDS, PGCE, DipMedEd, MGDS RCS(Eng), FFGDP(UK), FHEA, MICPD ILTM

Assistant Clinical Director, Southampton Personal Dental Service

Articles by Paul Howard

Abstract

This paper will summarize some of the clinical and organizational challenges for dentists and dental care professionals who are interested in working in custodial environments. This briefly covers some of the difficulties and pressures that the dental team face in providing dental care within these very specific environments. There are some features unique to this population group that can negatively affect their dental health experiences, related to socio-economic, lifestyle and other factors. In general, prisoners enjoy poorer dental health and mental health than the general population and present a greater degree of learning difficulties than the population at large. This requires additional skills and training for the dental teams treating this group and presents a number of challenges not always found in the provision of routine primary care dentistry.

CPD/Clinical Relevance: Although the article describes the provision of care for the prison environment in England, this is mirrored in other parts of the United Kingdom and the same general considerations will apply and be recognized in prisons in other national systems of dental care. Many of the areas covered are relevant independent of the systems in which care is delivered.

Article

There are a number of different secure custodial environments in the UK, including prisons, young offender institutions, secure hospitals and immigration removal centres. Although primarily concentrated in prisons, this article will touch on dental care provision in all these environments. Currently, there are 150 prisons and Youth Offender Institutes (YOIs) in England and Wales managed by Her Majesty's Prison Service (HMPS), part of the National Offender Management Service of the United Kingdom Government, and private companies such as Serco and G4S. In Northern Ireland there are three active prisons that are operated by the Northern Ireland Prison Service as well as a Juvenile Justice Centre operated by the Youth Justice Agency. The Scottish Prison Service operates 12 prisons and a Youth Offender Institute and there are also two privately run Scottish prisons.1

From April 2013, the health services in these settings have all been commissioned in the same way through NHS England. Providers may be NHS Trusts, private healthcare providers with NHS Contracts or individual dental providers, providing primary dental care as Mandatory Services under the General Dental Services of the National Health Service (NHS). Local Authorities are responsible under The Care Act 2014 that came into force in April 2015 for assessing social care needs of all adults in custody in their area, except in Immigration Removal Centres (IRCs), and providing or commissioning care and support to meet these needs. It is usual for there to be multiple providers of health and social care in secure environments. Often, a main healthcare provider will be commissioned and dental services will be sub-commissioned by that provider.

Care provision

The UK Department of Health (DoH) became responsible for healthcare in prisons in 2003, taking over from the Home Office. Dental Care in prisons is commissioned from the DoH specification,2 introduced on takeover in 2003, and is provided free of dental charges. There are two groups of prisoners; those who have been convicted of criminal offences and are serving a custodial term – a ‘prison sentence’, and those who are ‘on remand’ awaiting a court hearing. At the time of the 2003 specification, the suggested commissioning was for one dental session per week for every 250 prisoners. This is still being applied to the current date. Dental care is provided from dental surgeries within the prison itself, although often the only reminder that this is a different environment is the presence of bars on the windows as the surgery will be identical to those seen in high street environments (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Typical prison dental surgery with bars on window.

In the 2003 specification, which still stands, convicted prisoners are provided with full courses of treatment as Mandatory Services from the General Dental Services of the NHS.3 Remand prisoners are usually considered still to have their own dentist until actually convicted, so their care outlined in the strategy is ‘Occasional Care’ – in effect urgent care only for specific problems. This reflects the fact that they have not faced a conviction. They are (theoretically) still under the care of their own dentist. Although this 2003 specification still stands, there have been a number of interpretations on how this is applied in the prison environment,4, 5, 6 with an emphasis on providing permanent restorations (if possible), though without any advice on how to manage demand or relate this to the 2003 specifications. Treatment for both groups is provided free of charge. The General Dental Services have updated ‘Occasional Care’ with ‘Urgent Treatment’,7 which is difficult to translate to the Prison Environment and the Remand Status.

Special features of the prison environment

The main function of prison and detention centres is to detain inmates and to support them to prevent re-offending. Secure hospitals, in addition to providing detention, have the primary function of treating severe psychiatric disease. The inmates spend much of their time within a cell with very basic facilities (Figure 2). This may be locked for many hours a day (Figure 3). Access to oral health aids varies from prison to prison but will often be limited to just toothbrushes and toothpaste.

Figure 2. Typical prison cell.
Figure 3. Cell door.

Prisons are graded into four categories in relation to the types of prisoner they hold,8 reflecting their level of security (Table 1). Female prisons have four grades that are very similar.


Prison type Category Prison description
Closed prison A (High Security) Those who escape would be highly dangerous to the public or national security.
Closed prison B Those who do not require maximum security, but for whom escape still needs to be made very difficult.
Closed prison C Those who cannot be trusted in open conditions but who are unlikely to escape.
Open prison D Those who can be reasonably trusted not to try to escape, and are given the privilege of an open prison. These prisoners, subject to approval, may be given Release On Temporary Licence to work in the community.

Prisoner induction includes a health assessment and outlining of the Prison Rules.9 This legislation outlines how prisons are run and that prisons have a ‘no touch’ policy towards staff, which is explained to prisoners at their induction. Prison Rule 51 specifically describes the relationship between staff and prisoners. Generally, dental staff working in prisons see them as relatively safe environments.10

Challenges in providing prison dental services

In 2005,11 two challenges were seen for implementing the 2003 modernization strategy in preparation for local commissioning by Primary Care Trusts in 2006 of health services in prisons. These challenges still remain:

  • Providing high quality services and treating dental disease prisoners present with on entry to prison.
  • Reducing the amount of dental disease that the prisoners will have in the future.
  • The factors that make it more difficult to provide dental services to prisoners than to the general population are summarized in Figure 4 as conflicts between Demand, Needs, Supply (capacity) and Resources.

    Figure 4. From Reforming Prison Dental Services in England, a Guide to Good Practice, 2005.

    There is tension between high levels of dental need, especially urgent care, and demand for services. Access to care varies with institution, with prisoner movements to the dental surgery being more difficult the higher the security level. Levels of non-attendance are high; prisoners often place paid work, visits, gym and education sessions above dental attendance. Security affects access, as lockdowns and security checks prevent prisoner movements. Escort Officers can be in short supply as other security needs arise around a prison.

    The prison population is not a stable patient base; prisoners are moved around for a number of reasons including changes in their status and for disciplinary reasons. Short sentences and location changes result in courses of treatment that are often not completed.12 This can also make care provision difficult; in England and Wales commissioning still tends to be on the basis of set population figures of one commissioned dentist day per 250 prisoners, but over the course of a year a prison's turnover can be several thousand due to remand prisoners, licence recalls, short sentences and inter prison movements.

    Full dental records do not follow prisoners, so they may require repeat assessment following each transfer, and there is a problem with continuity of care for complex interventions, especially when a referral to secondary care has been made. Dentists in every prison record dental records in a variety of ways that include cards (such FP25 NHS dental envelopes), stand-alone systems and also brief entries on medical health systems, such as SystmOne®. Without standardization, it is difficult for records to follow the prisoner.

    Complaints and litigation

    Patient complaints in prison are a growing problem. Prisoners are more likely to complain if they feel that they have not been provided with the services to which they perceive they are entitled. They are less likely to understand their role in care. Effective management skills in understanding and learning from complaints are essential.

    It is not uncommon for requests for care to be made soon after entering the prison system, when very little attempt has been made before. Prisoners look to sorting out their dental problems while in custody. With no other distractions and a lot of time for self-reflection, there are often unreasonable expectations in terms of what can be achieved and regarding access to the care available. After often years of inattention, poor dental health has to be managed within the practicalities of a prison environment with treatment that is practical and achievable.

    Institutional living brings with it a sense of being provided for, making it difficult for patients to understand the need to take personal responsibility for their oral health. In addition, every prisoner comes with a lawyer attached. There are some aggressive litigation firms looking to profit from prison healthcare by finding any loophole or event where the outcome is not ideal, opening debates about the morality of making money from crime.

    Oral health

    The 2003 commissioning specification acknowledges that people in all types of detention have health likely to be worse than that of the population as a whole, made worse by the general environment of close communal living. Specific factors known to have affected dental health include a high prevalence of smoking (in 2017 UK prisons underwent a smoking ban), substance abuse with damaging contaminants13 and associated dietary problems, poor mental health, learning difficulties and low socio-economic status.14, 15 Physical health may be poor, due to lifestyle issues such as living on the streets to ‘being on the run’ attempting to avoid the justice system. Prisoner health is likely to be worse than that of the population as a whole, affected by close communal living.16 Substance abuse is associated with high levels of caries; from the ‘sugar rush’ addicts crave for high calorie foods and from the disguising of pain from opiates, etc, that would normally signal a need to access dental care. This means that devastating and rampant caries is often observed when abusers eventually present for care in the prison environment.17 Treatment for addiction also brings risks, eg use of methadone syrup which is also associated with caries. Substance abuse is also associated with high levels of blood borne diseases, including HIV and Hepatitis in all its forms. Chaotic lifestyles and low personal esteem associated with substance abuse relegate dental care to a low priority.

    Oral health of those entering prison is poorer than in the general population.11, 18, 19 As addiction problems in custody are addressed, the pain-masking effects of many street substances are lost and the full extent of personal dental neglect becomes clear. Dental pain quickly becomes more noticeable and more of a priority. Local anaesthesia can be more difficult to achieve as street substances, such as opioids and cocaine concoctions, can negatively modify the effectiveness of common preparations. For example, it is not uncommon for many cocaine derivatives to be mixed with Benzocaine as a bulking agent to make them go further.

    Deprivation and social exclusion found in inner city areas is reflected in a high proportion of prisoners coming from these areas, where employment can be around 50%. Oral diseases, like many other diseases, are linked to high levels of social exclusion. Chaotic lifestyles lead to oral neglect and poor nutrition. Untreated dental disease within the prison population is approximately four times that found in the equivalent socio-economic groups of the general society.20 The prison population, in addition to having increased dental need and poorer dental health, also tends to be less likely to access care.21

    Age of population

    With increasing rates of conviction for historical offences, the prison population is including older adults with specific and increasing dental needs. Christensen noted that the older population group is becoming increasingly dentate22 and there are factors that make them more susceptible to dental disease. The most common oral problems in older patients were identified by Christensen as:

  • An increase of difficult-to-restore dental caries;
  • Xerostomia due to decreased salivary flow and medications;
  • Loss of natural teeth;
  • Ongoing, unrecognized periodontal disease;
  • Excessive tooth wear;
  • A desire to look better and younger;
  • Impaired oral hygiene due to concomitant medical problems;
  • Loss of alveolar bone and resultant impaired use of removable prosthesis.
  • Untreated caries is generally higher in the household resident elderly population than in the general adult population and older adults living in residential environments, including custodial environments, have higher caries prevalence and report more pain than in the general adult population. They are less likely to have a functional dentition.23, 24

    In the older population, oral and dental degeneration is related to years of chewing, smoking, trauma and dysfunctional oral habits, along with heavily restored dentitions requiring a high degree of maintenance. Destructive effects of periodontal disease are more likely to be seen in older age groups because of the chronic nature of the disease, although ageing has no direct damaging effect on the periodontal tissues.25

    The Oral Health Foundation Charity26 warns of dental problems in those aged over 50 who have dentures, partial dentures and bridges, which can also become the cause of other oral health problems, such as dental stomatitis (thrush). When linked to socio-economic and lifestyle factors these problems become compounded.

    Mental health

    Detained people are likely to have worse health than that of the population, because of the general environment of close communal living.16 It is recognized that there is a higher incidence of learning difficulties and mental health problems in the prison population.27 Recent figures show that 39% of offenders supervised by probation services, and up to 90% of prisoners, have some form of mental health problem.28 Cognitive difficulties due to dementia, an acquired brain injury or a learning disability make the provision of care more challenging. Severe mental illnesses may be behind offending behaviour and such offenders from a prison, YOI or IRC, are sent to be treated in mental health hospital services using Section 47/48 of the Mental Health Act.29

    Due to low levels of literacy and incomplete education, prisoners may lack mental capacity for a specific decision at the time it needs to be made for a wide range of reasons. Before intervention begins, physical health, mental health, neuro-disability and substance misuse needs are assessed and may require ‘Best Interests’ decisions to be made under Section 4 of the Mental Capacity Act 2005.30

    Staff competencies

    Specific skills are needed for working in the prison environment. Four domains are described by the Faculty of General Dental Practitioners (UK) for dentists in prison dentistry,31 building on the areas of the COPDEND domains framework for Foundation Training32and those outlined by the UK General Dental Council for registration.33Table 2 outlines the skill sets required to work in a prison environment and recognize the enhancements needed for the special environment.


    COPDEND/Preparing for Practice Domains Prison Dentistry Domains
    Clinical
  • History, examination and diagnosis
  • Treatment planning and patient management
  • Medical and dental emergencies
  • Anaesthesia and pain control
  • Therapy, treatment and prevention
  • Management of dental treatment in patients who are substance misusers
  • Management of dental care in patients with mental health problems or a learning disability
  • Management and leadership
  • Clinical governance and audit
  • Oral health promotion
  • The role of the dental team
  • Professional networks
  • Professionalism (Environmental)
  • Security
  • Ethical issues and safe practice in prison
  • The prison environment
  • Prison dentistry in the wider context
  • Communication
  • Communication with prisoners, representatives and advocates
  • Communication with the clinical team, peers and other professionals
  • Effective management of complaints
  • Clinical

    The prison population requires enhanced clinical skills, particularly in managing acute problems. Additional skills in minor oral surgery are essential as exodontia is a frequent treatment need. Security considerations can limit access to secondary care support but making appropriate referrals is important. Conscious sedation for behaviour management is not normally appropriate or available. Joint working with other members of the healthcare teams is necessary in managing urgent care. Some providers use the system outlined by the Scottish Dental Clinical Effectiveness Programme,34 prioritizing dental care using a structured triage process.

    Leadership and management

    In most prisons the team is normally just the dentist and dental nurse in a single surgery environment. They need to manage a unique high risk environment with efficient working practices and good governance. Good record keeping and prescribing is needed for effective referral to dental care professionals such as dental therapists, hygienists and technicians. The dentist, as team leader, needs to support dental care professionals with high professional standards and maintain effective working with the wider healthcare and prison environments.

    Environmental

    The primary requirement in the prison environment is security and retaining inmates in custody. This affects both professional behaviour and clinical practice. Prison dental staff must be trained in prison security procedures, personal safety, material and instrument security, accounting for every instrument in use and keeping all sharps out of reach. Items such as waste and sharps need to be safely removed at the end of each session. Because of the security requirements of the prison environment and also of secure mental health units, it is necessary to have measures in place to secure materials and instruments. Normally, instruments and equipment will be subject to regular security checks and staff will complete returns for start and end of sessions of checks on instruments. Instruments will be kept out of reach of patients as they could be used as weapons. If anything is found to be missing, there is normally a search of all those who had an appointment after the last check.

    It is often necessary to escort prisoners from waiting/holding areas, which may be locked, to access the dental surgery and it is usual for staff to be in contact with prisoners without a member of prison staff present, except if a specific security issue has been identified by the prison authorities. Clinician/patient confidentiality is recognized as being important to maintain. This means dental staff do need security clearance, a process which can be lengthy, and will normally draw keys. Visitors have to be directly escorted by a key holder and can have up to three visits at the prison's discretion, so this provides for staff covering for sickness or leave.

    Communication

    Prisoners, their representatives and advocates, other healthcare professionals and other members of the dental team present different communication needs. Prisoners present with learning disabilities and/or mental health problems and there is a growing population of foreign nationals for whom English is not their first language. Communication difficulties can affect the process of informed consent to treatment. Effective influencing and negotiating skills are requirements for effective oral health promotion in the prison setting.

    Conclusion

    The prison population receives dental care that is provided under specific security requirements of the prison system. This requires very specific skills sets from the dental team in addition to their dental skills. Development of good communication and behaviour management skills is important, as resources such as conscious sedation may not be available and the prison population tends to have unreasonable expectations about treatment outcomes. Because of a number of social and lifestyle factors in the prison population, there are more dental problems that present significant challenges from poorer oral and general health than are found in the general population.