References

MyelomaUK. Myeloma and the kidney 2015. https://www.myeloma.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Myeloma-UK-Kidney-Infoguide.pdf (Accessed 06/06/2017)
Broder S, Humphrey R, Durm M, Blackman M, Meade B, Goldman C Impaired synthesis of polyclonal (non-paraprotein) immunoglobulins by circulating lymphocytes from patients with multiple myeloma: role of suppressor cells. N Engl J Med. 1975; 293:887-892
Goldschmidt H, Lannert H, Bommer J, Ho AD. Multiple myeloma and renal failure. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2000; 15:301-304
Riedel D, Pottern L. The epidemiology of multiple myeloma. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 1992; 6
Landgren O, Kyle RA, Pfeiffer RM, Katzmann JA, Caporaso NE, Hayes RB Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) consistently precedes multiple myeloma: a prospective study. Blood. 2009; 113:5412-5417
Beason T, Colditz G. Obesity and multiple myeloma. In: Mittelman SD, Berger NA (eds). New York: Springer; 2012
In: Durie BG (ed). Oxford: Elsevier; 2001
Kyle RA, Child JA, Anderson K, Barlogie B, Bataille R, Bensinger W Criteria for the classification of monoclonal gammopathies, multiple myeloma and related disorders: a report of the International Myeloma Working Group. Br J Haematol. 2003; 121:749-757
Delorme S, Baur-Melnyk A.New York: Springer; 2011
Rajkumar SV, Larson D, Kyle RA. Diagnosis of smoldering multiple myeloma. New Engl J Med. 2011; 365:474-475
NHS. Multiple myeloma: Treatment. http://www.nhs.uk/Conditions/Multiple-myeloma/Pages/Treatment.aspx (Accessed 16/02/2015)
Moreau P, San Miguel J, Ludwig H, Schouten H, Mohty M, Dimopoulos M Multiple myeloma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2013; 24:133-137
Korde N, Kristinsson SY, Landgren O. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM): novel biological insights and development of early treatment strategies. Blood. 2011; 117:5573-5581
Rajkumar SV, Landgren O, Mateos M-V. Smoldering multiple myeloma. Blood. 2015; 125:3069-3075
American Cancer Society. Bisphosphonates for multiple myeloma 2016. https://www.cancer.org/cancer/multiple-myeloma/treating/bisphosphonates.html (Accessed 14/05/2017)
Fayers PM, Palumbo A, Hulin C, Waage A, Wijermans P, Beksaç M Thalidomide for previously untreated elderly patients with multiple myeloma: meta-analysis of 1685 individual patient data from 6 randomized clinical trials. Blood. 2011; 118:1239-1247
San Miguel JF, Schlag R, Khuageva NK, Dimopoulos MA, Shpilberg O, Kropff M Bortezomib plus melphalan and prednisone for initial treatment of multiple myeloma. New Engl J Med. 2008; 359:906-917
Pönisch W, Mitrou P, Merkle K, Herold M, Assmann M, Wilhelm G Treatment of bendamustine and prednisone in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma results in superior complete response rate, prolonged time to treatment failure and improved quality of life compared to treatment with melphalan and prednisone – a randomized phase III study of the East German Study Group of Hematology and Oncology (OSHO). J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2006; 132:205-212
Palumbo A, Hajek R, Delforge M, Kropff M, Petrucci MT, Catalano J Continuous lenalidomide treatment for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. New Engl J Med. 2012; 366:1759-1769
Morgan GJ, Davies FE, Gregory WM, Russell NH, Bell SE, Szubert AJ Cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (CTD) as initial therapy for patients with multiple myeloma unsuitable for autologous transplantation. Blood. 2011; 118:1231-1238
Child JA, Morgan GJ, Davies FE, Owen RG, Bell SE, Hawkins K High-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem-cell rescue for multiple myeloma. New Engl J Med. 2003; 348:1875-1883
Harousseau J-L, Attal M, Avet-Loiseau H, Marit G, Caillot D, Mohty M Bortezomib plus dexamethasone is superior to vincristine plus doxorubicin plus dexamethasone as induction treatment prior to autologous stem-cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: results of the IFM 2005-01 phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28:4621-4629
Attal M, Harousseau J-L, Stoppa A-M, Sotto J-J, Fuzibet J-G, Rossi J-F A prospective, randomized trial of autologous bone marrow transplantation and chemotherapy in multiple myeloma. New Engl J Med. 1996; 335:91-97
Moreau P, Facon T, Attal M, Hulin C, Michallet M, Maloisel F Comparison of 200 mg/m2 melphalan and 8 Gy total body irradiation plus 140 mg/m2 melphalan as conditioning regimens for peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: final analysis of the Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome 9502 randomized trial. Blood. 2002; 99:731-735
Baron R, Ferrari S, Russell RGG. Denosumab and bisphosphonates: different mechanisms of action and effects. Bone. 2011; 48:677-692
Russell RGG. From bench to bedside. Skeletal development and remodeling in health. Aging Dis. 2006; 1068:367-401
Marx RE, Sawatari Y, Fortin M, Broumand V. Bisphosphonate-induced exposed bone (osteonecrosis/osteopetrosis) of the jaws: risk factors, recognition, prevention, and treatment. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005; 63:1567-1575
Ji B, Yang Q, Genever PG, Fagan MJ. Investigating the efficacy of bisphosphonates treatment against multiple myeloma induced bone disease using a computational model. Biomed Mater Eng. 2014; 24:3373-3378
Morgan GJ, Davies FE, Gregory WM, Cocks K, Bell SE, Szubert AJ First-line treatment with zoledronic acid as compared with clodronic acid in multiple myeloma (MRC Myeloma IX): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010; 376:(9757)1989-1999
Ruggiero SL, Dodson TB, Fantasia J American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons position paper on medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw – 2014 update. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014; 72:1938-1956
Marx RE. Pamidronate (Aredia) and zoledronate (Zometa) induced avascular necrosis of the jaws: a growing epidemic. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003; 61:1115-1117
FGDP. National study on avascular necrosis of the jaws including bisphosphonate-related necrosis 2012. https://www.fgdp.org.uk/sites/fgdp.org.uk/files/docs/in-practice/amps-online/final report-27.11.12.pdf (Accessed 02/09/2017)
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust. Necrosis Clinic MDT Guidance Document. 2016;
Migliorati CA, Woo S-B, Hewson I, Barasch A, Elting LS, Spijkervet FK A systematic review of bisphosphonate osteonecrosis (BON) in cancer. Supportive Care In Cancer. 2010; 18:1099-1106
NICE. Final appraisal determination. Denosumab for the prevention of skeletal-related events in adults with bone metastases from solid tumours 2012. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ta265/documents/bone-metastases-from-solid-tumours-denosumab-final-appraisal-determination-guidance2 (Accessed 26/04/2018)
Henry DH, Costa L, Goldwasser F, Hirsh V, Hungria V, Prausova J Randomized, double-blind study of denosumab versus zoledronic acid in the treatment of bone metastases in patients with advanced cancer (excluding breast and prostate cancer) or multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2011; 29:1125-1132
Ohga N, Yamazaki Y, Tsuboi K, Kitagawa Y. Healing of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) after discontinuation of denosumab in a patient with bone metastases of colorectal cancer: a case report and hypothesis. Quintessence Int. 2015; 46::621-626
Borggrefe J, Giravent S, Campbell G, Thomsen F, Chang D, Franke M Association of osteolytic lesions, bone mineral loss and trabecular sclerosis with prevalent vertebral fractures in patients with multiple myeloma. Eur J Radiol. 2015; 84:2269-2274
Raje NS, Yee AJ, Roodman GD. Advances in supportive care for multiple myeloma. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (JNCCN). 2014; 12:502-511
Epstein J, Voss N, Stevenson-Moore P. Maxillofacial manifestations of multiple myeloma: an unusual case and review of the literature. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral. 1984; 57:267-271
Mozaffari E, Mupparapu M, Otis L. Undiagnosed multiple myeloma causing extensive dental bleeding: report of a case and review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontol. 2002; 94:448-453
Reboiras LM, García GA, Antúnez LJ, Blanco CA, Gándara VP, Gándara RJ. Anaesthesia of the right lower hemilip as a first manifestation of multiple myeloma. Presentation of a clinical case. Medicina Oral. 2000; 6:168-172
Pinto LSS, Campagnoli EB, Leon JE, Lopes MA, Jorge J. Maxillary lesion presenting as a first sign of multiple myeloma: case report. Medicina Oral Patología Oral Y Cirugía Bucal. 2007; 12:344-347
Lee S-H, Huang J-J, Pan W-L, Chan C-P. Gingival mass as the primary manifestation of multiple myeloma: report of two cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontol. 1996; 82:75-79
Adle-Biassette H, Vallat A, Nochy D. Amyloidosis: definition and classification. Archiv D'anat Cytol Pathol. 1995; 44:101-105
Reinish EI, Raviv M, Srolovitz H, Gornitsky M. Tongue, primary amyloidosis, and multiple myeloma. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1994; 77:121-125
Daoud MS, Lust JA, Kyle RA, Pittelkow MR. Monoclonal gammopathies and associated skin disorders. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1999; 40:507-535
Salisbury PL, Jacoway JR. Oral amyloidosis: a late complication of multiple myeloma. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1983; 56:48-50
Burke MC, Fenlon MR, Banerjee A. The role of the general dental practitioner in managing the oral care of head and neck oncology patients. Dent Update. 2012; 39:694-702
Rugani P, Walter C, Kirnbauer B, Acham S, Begus-Nahrman Y, Jakse N. Prevalence of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients with breast cancer, prostate cancer, and multiple myeloma. Dent J. 2016; 4
SDCEP. Oral Health Management of Patient at Risk of Medication-related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw. 2017. http://www.sdcep.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/SDCEP-Oral-Health-Management-of-Patients-at-Risk-of-MRONJ-Guidance-in-Brief.pdf (Accessed 01/09/2017)
Dimopoulos M, Kastritis E, Bamia C, Melakopoulos I, Gika D, Roussou M Reduction of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) after implementation of preventive measures in patients with multiple myeloma treated with zoledronic acid. Ann Oncol. 2008; 20:117-120
Lonial S, Waller EK, Richardson PG, Jagannath S, Orlowski RZ, Giver CR Risk factors and kinetics of thrombocytopenia associated with bortezomib for relapsed, refractory multiple myeloma. Blood. 2005; 106:3777-3784
Scully C, Dios PD, Kumar N. Special Care In Dentistry: Handbook of Oral Healthcare.Oxford: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2006
Prabhala RH, Neri P, Bae JE, Tassone P, Shammas MA, Allam CK Dysfunctional T regulatory cells in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2006; 107:301-304
Kumar N, Brooke A, Burke M, John R, O'Donnell A, Soldani F. The oral management of oncology patients requiring radiotherapy, chemotherapy and/or bone marrow transplantation. Faculty Dent J. 2013; 4:200-203
Weber D, Rankin K, Gavino M, Delasalle K, Alexanian R. Thalidomide alone or with dexamethasone for previously untreated multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2003; 21:16-19
United Kingdom Medicines Information (UKMI). What steroid supplementation is required for a patient with primary adrenal insufficiency undergoing a dental procedure?. 2012. https://www.sps.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/NW-QA-323.3-Steroid-supplementation-for-patients-with-adrenal-insufficiency-.pdf (accessed 01/09/2017)
Shah A, Ahmad I, Latoo S.: INTECH Open Access Publisher; 2012
Majhail NS, Rizzo JD, Lee SJ, Aljurf M, Atsuta Y, Bonfim C Recommended screening and preventive practices for long-term survivors after hematopoietic cell transplantation. Hematol/Oncol Stem Cell Therapy. 2012; 5:1-30
Sonis S, Kunz A. Impact of improved dental services on the frequency of oral complications of cancer therapy for patients with non-head-and-neck malignancies. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1988; 65:19-22
Vasanthan A, Dallal N. Periodontal treatment considerations for cell transplant and organ transplant patients. Periodontology 2000. 2007; 44:82-102
Morimoto Y, Niwa H, Imai Y, Kirita T. Dental management prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Spec Care Dent. 2004; 24:287-292
Durey K, Patterson H, Gordon K. Dental assessment prior to stem cell transplant: treatment need and barriers to care. Br Dent J. 2009; 206:478-479
Meier JK-H, Wolff D, Pavletic S, Greinix H, Gosau M, Bertz H Oral chronic graft-versus-host disease: report from the International Consensus Conference on clinical practice in cGVHD. Clin Oral Investig. 2011; 15:127-139
Majhail NS, Brazauskas R, Rizzo JD, Sobecks RM, Wang Z, Horowitz MM Secondary solid cancers after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation using busulfan-cyclophosphamide conditioning. Blood. 2011; 117:316-322
Rizzo JD, Curtis RE, Socié G, Sobocinski KA, Gilbert E, Landgren O Solid cancers after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Blood. 2009; 113:1175-1183
Rizzo JD, Wingard JR, Tichelli A, Lee SJ, Van Lint MT, Burns LJ Recommended screening and preventive practices for long-term survivors after hematopoietic cell transplantation: joint recommendations of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, and the American Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2006; 12:138-151
Smidt A, Lipovetsky-Adler M, Sharon E. Forced eruption as an alternative to tooth extraction in long-term use of oral bisphosphonates: review, risks and technique. J Am Dent Assoc. 2012; 143:1303-1312

Oral and dental management for people with multiple myeloma: clinical guidance for dental care providers

From Volume 45, Issue 5, May 2018 | Pages 383-399

Authors

Hassan Abed

BDS, MSc, Dip RCS(I), MFDS RCPS(Glasg), CAGS, PhD (KCL),

Assistant Professor and Consultant of Conscious Sedation and Special Care Dentistry, Department of Basic and Clinical Oral Science, Faculty of Dentistry, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia

Articles by Hassan Abed

Email Hassan Abed

Mary Burke

Senior Dental Officer in Sedation and Special Care Dentistry, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Trust

Articles by Mary Burke

Najla Nizarali

Specialist in Sedation and Special Care Dentistry, Department of Sedation and Special Care Dentistry, Floor 26 Tower Wing, Guy's Hospital, London Bridge, London SE1 9RT, UK

Articles by Najla Nizarali

Abstract

Abstract: Multiple myeloma (MM) is defined as cancer of the plasma cells that is characterized by the production of abnormal immunoglobulin. It most commonly presents in people over 65 years of age, with a higher prevalence in men. People with MM can present with bone pain, renal failure, anaemia, thrombocytopenia and neutropenia, which can arise from the condition itself or from its treatment. A large proportion will be treated with intravenous bisphosphonates, therefore putting them at an increased risk of developing medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). This paper aims to provide guidance on the oral and dental management of people with multiple myeloma.

CPD/Clinical Relevance: To provide an update to dental care providers on the oral and dental management of people with multiple myeloma and provide a guide on what factors to consider when deciding on the most appropriate setting for the provision of their dental care.

Article

Hassan Abed

Multiple myeloma

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a cancer of plasma cells in the bone marrow. It is the second most common bone marrow cancer, yet it only accounts for 2% of all cancers.1 Plasma cells are a type of white blood cell (WBC) that produce antibodies to help fight pathogens. Plasma cells in people with MM function abnormally and release only one type of antibody, known as paraprotein, which has no useful function.2 These cancer cells also produce significant amounts of abnormal proteins, called M protein, which can cause kidney damage.3 Multiple myeloma does not usually take the form of a lump or tumour; instead, it fills the bone marrow with abnormal cells and interferes with the production of other cells, thereby causing damage to bones and affecting the production of healthy blood cells. This leads to low normal white blood cell counts (neutropenia) and low platelet counts (thrombocytopenia). In the UK, 5,500 new cases of MM are diagnosed each year.1There are approximately 17,500 people living with myeloma in the UK at any one time.1 It most commonly affects men over the age of 65 years and has a higher prevalence in black populations compared with Asian and white populations.4 It is 1.5 times more common in men than women.5

Causes of multiple myeloma

The cause of MM is unknown. Studies have shown certain risk factors to play a part. It is known that people diagnosed with monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance (MGUS) can go on to develop MM. Monoclonal gammopathy is a non-cancerous benign condition characterized by the production of an excess number of a single antibody in the blood.6 Most patients with MGUS are asymptomatic, and its cause is unknown. Each year about 1 in 100 patients diagnosed with MGUS will go on to develop MM and will require treatment.5 Other known risk factors for developing MM include being overweight or obese7 and being exposed to radiation or certain chemicals.8 Further research is ongoing into the biology and genetics of myeloma to determine the factors responsible for its onset and progression.

Signs and symptoms

Multiple myeloma may not cause any symptoms in the early stage. It is often diagnosed after a routine blood or urine test (Figure 1). If left untreated, people may present with persistent dull bone pain and bone fracture (Figure 2). They may also experience generalized weakness and shortness of breath as a result of anaemia, recurrent infections, prolonged bleeding resulting from defective platelets, and hyperviscosity of red blood cells (RBCs).9Table 1 summarizes the signs and symptoms of MM.

Figure 1. A microscopic image of bone marrow aspirate of a patient with multiple myeloma showing numerous plasma cells, which can be recognized by the eccentric nucleus and perinuclear halo.
Figure 2. A Dental Panoramic Tomogram (DPT) shows a pathological fracture of the body of the mandible (right side) in a patient with multiple myeloma.

Signs and Symptoms Description
Bone Pain The extent of myeloma bone diseases varies considerably from one patient to another. It often presents in the middle or lower back, hips and ribs. The long bones of the upper arm and leg and the shoulder may also be involved but the bones of the hands and feet are rarely affected, as they do not contain bone marrow.
Vertebral bone fractures and spinal cord compression MM weakens the vertebrae and makes them more prone to fractures (compression fracture). The spine is most often affected leading to kyphosis. Spine fracture can cause compression of the spinal cord leading to the sensation of pins and needles in the legs and feet.
Anaemia Abnormal plasma cells fill up the bone marrow and interfere with the production of other cells, including healthy red blood cells, and therefore anaemia. Patients usually feel tired and breathless.
Recurrent infection Low production of white blood cells affects the immune system and people become more vulnerable to infection.
Hypercalcaemia High amount of calcium is released from affected bones leading to symptoms of hypercalcaemia (thirst, frequent urination, tiredness, constipation, confusion and drowsiness).
Bleeding disorders Low production of platelets affects clotting resulting in nosebleeds, gingival bleeding and a heavy menstrual period.
Hyperviscosity of the blood Hyperviscosity of the blood can cause headaches, dizziness, nosebleeds, and shortness of breath.
Kidney disease Renal failure can occur due to abnormal proteins (myeloma protein). Signs of kidney damage include loss of energy, swollen feet and legs, breathlessness and itchy skin.

Diagnosis of multiple myeloma

There are various diagnostic tests that aid the diagnosis of MM, but it is difficult to diagnose based on a single laboratory test result. Many factors are considered such as medical history, physical examination, signs, symptoms and diagnostic testing. Blood and urine tests, as well as a bone marrow biopsy, are the main laboratory tests used to investigate any patients with MM.9 Additionally, radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computerized tomography (CT) scans and Positron Emission Tomography (PET) scanning are used to determine the stage of the disease and determine the type of treatment required (Table 2).10 The standards for diagnosing MM are determined by the myeloma diagnostic criteria. This currently requires confirmation of one major and one minor criterion or three minor criteria in people with symptoms of myeloma.9 These criteria enable classification of MM into three types:

  • MGUS;
  • Asymptomatic multiple myeloma (smoldering myeloma); or
  • Symptomatic myeloma.9,11

  • Imaging Techniques Description
    Standard X-ray
  • It is routine to use a standard X-ray to detect myeloma bone disease – ‘Skeletal survey’
  • This survey includes the spine, hip, chest, long bones of the arms, legs and skull
  • MRI
  • More sensitive than standard X-ray
  • Does not include the use of radiation
  • Helps detect small osteolytic bony lesions
  • Better for investigation of spinal cord compression
  • Helps assess the extent of the myeloma stages in the bone marrow
  • CT-scan
  • Helps detect any localized collection of myeloma cells (plasmacytoma)
  • Used to pinpoint myeloma severity on areas such as rib and sternum
  • Determines the presence or absence of the myeloma in the bone more accurately than the standard X-ray
  • PET-scan
  • Useful for determining active myeloma cells
  • Radioactive sugar (18fluorine-fluoro-deoxyglucose/FDG-PET) is injected into the vein, which is then absorbed by the active cells
  • Considered the most sensitive technique to detect active myeloma cells in the bone
  • It is not available in all hospitals and is costly
  • Classification is important because immediate disease-directed treatment is only needed for symptomatic myeloma (Table 3). Diagnostic test results determine the extent of the disease, best treatment options, help with assessing response to treatment and estimate overall prognosis. People in some categories do not have to receive treatment immediately, but may receive bisphosphonates if osteoporosis is present.


    Types Serum M Protein Level % of Plasma Cells in Bone Marrow Anaemia Osteolytic Lesion Renal Failure Hypercalcaemia
    MGUS <3 g/dL <10% Absent Absent Absent Absent
    Asymptomatic myeloma ≥3 g/dL ≥10% Absent Absent Absent Absent
    Symptomatic myeloma ≥3 g/dL >30% Mild/Moderate Multiple Present High Level

    Treatment of multiple myeloma

    People diagnosed with MM receive treatment under the care of a multidisciplinary team (MDT), which is usually led by a haematologist who specializes in myeloma.12 The aims in treating MM are to stabilize the condition and prevent and treat any symptoms related to MM, such as bone pain, anaemia, kidney damage and hypercalcaemia.13 Although there is no absolute cure for MM, treating the myeloma-related symptoms will help to improve quality of life and prevent further complications. The choice of initial treatment depends on various factors, such as the features of the myeloma itself, anticipated risk of side-effects, convenience and the familiarity of the treating physician with the given regimen.

    Treatment is usually based on age and fitness. In general, the treatment is less intensive for the older (>65 years) or less fit and more intensive for younger (<65 years) and fitter people. Both groups receive a combination of anti-myeloma agents. A stem cell transplant usually follows the intensive course of chemotherapy. Multiple myeloma drug therapies consist of two aspects: one to control the myeloma, the other to alleviate symptoms and manage complications of the disease (such as bone damage) as well as the side-effects of treatment.

    There have been advances in treatment options with the development of newer medications and different approaches. Myeloma is a relapsing-remitting cancer; therefore treatment of MM consists of induction, consolidation and maintenance phases. The length of treatment varies, depending on the type of treatment used and the stage at which the treatment is given. Summary of medical management based on the myeloma classification is as follows:

  • Monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance (MGUS);
  • Asymptomatic multiple myeloma;
  • Symptomatic myeloma (active form).
  • 1. Monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance (MGUS)

    As there are no symptoms or serious complications associated with MGUS, it does not require treatment,13 but regular monitoring every 3–4 months for the first year for any signs or symptoms is crucial to investigate the possibility of myeloma development. In the second year, monitoring reduces to every 6–12 months if no symptoms develop. The Serum Free Light Chain Assay (SFLCA) is a very sensitive test that could be used to monitor these patients and has been reported to be effective in detecting early signs of myeloma development. Recently, researchers have tried to understand what factors might lead to the development of MM from MGUS, and whether any treatment may slow down or prevent the progression to MM. It is well known that MGUS is characterized with asymptomatic plasma cell dyscrasias, with a possibility to progress to symptomatic MM. Recently, there have been developments in risk stratification models, such as assessing the molecular markers of MGUS. This has led to a better understanding of the histopathology and possible transformation of MGUS to an active symptomatic form of MM. Developing individualized risk profiles for patients with MGUS is considered an ongoing challenge. These have to be assessed by prospective clinical monitoring, for example, flow cytometry, free-light chain analyses, cytogenetic, gene expression profiling and microRNA, as well as molecular imaging for predicting risk of progression. All these factors may help develop early treatment strategies to delay and/or prevent development of MM.14

    2. Asymptomatic multiple myeloma

    Patients with asymptomatic MM can live without any complications and therefore without treatment.13 Early treatment does not seem to make a difference to overall survival. Regular monitoring every 3 to 4 months is recommended.15 Bone-modifying agents, such as a bisphosphonate, must be started as soon as there is any evidence of bone involvement. The most frequently prescribed bisphosphonates are Pamidronate (Aredia®) and Zoledronic acid (Zometa®). These bone-modifying agents are administrated intravenously. The usual dose is once a month at first, but reduced frequency later if there is a reduction in bone damage. Treatment with bisphosphonate can cause the serious side-effect of bone necrosis, which is discussed later.16

    3. Symptomatic myeloma (active form)

    Treatment of the active form of MM is often started with anti-myeloma drug therapies. The drug regimen chosen depends on the patient's health and whether a stem cell transplant is considered. Generally, triplets (three drugs) are preferred, but doublets (two drugs) may be considered, particularly in cases where the side-effects of triplets are a concern. In this active form of MM, infusion with intravenous bisphosphonate (usually Zoledronic acid) is started with chemotherapy. If bone disease persists, low radiation therapy to the affected area is considered. Additionally, people routinely receive supportive treatments, such as intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), as they are at increased risk of infection; blood transfusions to treat low blood cell counts and erythropoietin (EPO) for anaemia. Treatment of symptomatic myeloma consists of induction, consolidation and maintenance phases as follows:

  • Induction phase;
  • Consolidation phase;
  • Maintenance phase.
  • Induction phase

    Elderly patients >65 years (in general not suitable for stem cell transplant)

    Combinations of oral Melphalan and Prednisolone (MP) are considered the standard treatment in elderly people with the active form of MM. Another two options that might be considered are Melphalan/Prednisolone/Thalidomide (MPT),17 or Bortezomib/Melphalan/Prednisolone (VMP),18 which are both approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A double regimen of Bendamustine plus Prednisolone in people diagnosed with neuropathy is routinely used.19 Some haematologists may consider a triple regimen of Melphalan/Prednisolone/Lenalidomide (MPR).20

    Cyclophosphamide/Thalidomide/Dexamethasone (CTD) has also been used, showing acceptable results, but not better than the MP regimen.21 Lenalidomide combined with low-dose Dexamethasone is widely used in the US.

    Younger patients <65 years (fit patients suitable for stem cell transplant)

    Induction therapy has been significantly increased by the use of novel agent-based combinations22,23 (Table 4). There is no current research that compares the combinations and their effectiveness. Three to four courses are recommended before proceeding to stem cell collection. Stem cell transplant consists of an induction chemotherapy phase followed by high-dose chemotherapeutic agent, such as Melphalan, with autologous blood-producing stem cells to replace healthy cells damaged by the chemotherapy agents.22,24,25


    Multiple Myeloma Treatment Drug Combination
    Triplet regimen
  • Revlimid-Velcade-Dexamethasone (RVD)
  • Velcade-Cyclophosphamide-Dexamethasone (VCD or CyBorD)
  • Velcade-Thalidomide-Dexamethasone (VTD)
  • Double regimen (elderly and frail patients)
  • Revlimid-Dexamethasone (RD)
  • Velcade-Dexamethasone (VD)
  • Immunomodulatory drugs
  • Thalidomide is an immunomodulatory drug approved for use for the treatment of MM.
  • Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) is a more potent molecular analogue of thalidomide, which inhibits tumour angiogenesis, tumour secreted cytokines and tumour proliferation through the induction of apoptosis,24,25 and is usually used for the treatment of relapse cases.26
  • Proteasome inhibitors
  • Bortezomib (Velcade®) is the proteasome inhibitor that breaks down proteins, which can help kill myeloma cells. It is approved for treating relapsed MM27
  • Chemotherapeutic agents
  • The most common types of chemotherapeutic agents used to treat MM are Cyclophosphamide and Melphalan.
  • Corticosteroids
  • Steroid therapy aims to destroy myeloma cells and works as an adjunct to make the chemotherapy more effective. The two most common types of steroids used to treat MM are Dexamethasone and Prednisolone.
  • Consolidation phase

    This phase consists of regular follow-up without treatment, or a course of chemotherapy with anti-myeloma agents for a specific time frame. This decision is based on the laboratory results, such as paraprotein levels in the blood. Additional cycles of chemotherapy therapy may be considered for patients who are about to undergo a stem cell transplant, followed by regular monitoring with blood samples taken every 3–4 months after the stem cell transplant.

    Maintenance phase

    There has been evidence to indicate that additional cycles of short-term anti-myeloma agents can increase overall survival rate. However, long-term maintenance therapy with excessive doses of anti-myeloma agents is not recommended13 and further clinical trials are required to assess the benefits of the long-term anti-myeloma therapy and the effect on overall survival. Table 4 shows the different treatment options in the induction, consolidation and maintenance phases.

    Bisphosphonates (bone modifying agents)

    Bisphosphonates are analogues of pyrophosphate used in the treatment of myeloma bone disease, usually in conjunction with other cancer therapy.26 These bone-modifying agents help reduce hypercalcaemia, slow down the progression of bone disease,27,28 reduce bone pain, reduce bone fracture and help to improve overall survival rate of patients with MM. Bisphosphonates have an anti-tumour effect.29 A randomized clinical trial (RCT) study by Morgan et al demonstrated the anti-tumour effect of zoledronate, leading to a positive impact on survival rate; there is a 12% improvement in the progression-free survival (PFS) during the first year, and a 16% reduction in the risk of mortality and skeletal related events (SREs).30 Bisphosphonates are also used in the treatment of bone metastases in other malignancies (most often breast, prostate and lung).31 Most patients with MM receive a monthly intravenous infusion of bisphosphonates. The national myeloma IX trial shows the effectiveness of intravenous infusion of bisphosphonates over the oral tablets in reducing bone fractures, increasing period of remission, and increasing overall survival rate.31 Bisphosphonates are generally well tolerated and there are mild side-effects such as fever, nausea, vein irritation and reduced kidney function. There is risk of the serious complication medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) (Figure 3 a and b). According to the position paper of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (AAOMS), patients may be considered to have MRONJ if all of the following three characteristics are present: current or previous treatment with bisphosphonates, exposed necrotic bone in the maxillofacial region that has not healed for more than eight weeks, with no history of radiotherapy to the jaws.32 This is most likely to develop after an invasive dental procedure such as dental extraction, but can also develop spontaneously. Marx first reported bisphosphonate osteonecrosis of the jaw in 2003 and it is a well-recognized condition.33 The incidence of MRONJ varies across the literature depending on the type of study design, patient follow-up, and the type of bisphosphonate used. Intravenous preparations carry a higher risk and a range of incidences have been stated.34,35 A systematic review by Migliorati et al had shown that the prevalence of MRONJ in MM is 11.3% (86/764 cases) in cohorts with documented follow up, 2.8% (69/2479 cases) in epidemiological studies, and 2.7% (19/693 cases) in cohorts with undocumented follow-up. This confirmed the predominance of patients in developing MRONJ had MM, followed by metastatic breast, prostate and lung cancer, respectively.36 Additionally, a retrospective analysis of 11 studies that evaluated 614 cases of MRONJ shows that 45% (245 cases) were in patients with MM.36Table 5 summarizes bisphosphonates used in the treatment of MM and possible long-term side-effects.


    Type Brand Name Route of Administration
    Disodium pamidronate Aredia Intravenous infusion over 90–120 minutes
    Zoledronic acid Zometa Intravenous infusion over 15–30 minutes
  • Functions of bisphosphonates for patients diagnosed with MM:
  • Slow down the progression of bone resorption.
  • Reduce bone pain, and therefore reduce need for pain relief and hence damage to kidneys and liver.
  • Treatment of hypercalcaemia.
  • Reduce the possibility of fractures, therefore improving overall quality of life and survival rate.
  • Side–effects of using bisphosphonates in patients diagnosed with MM:
  • Increase risk of developing the MRONJ (medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw).
  • Gastrointestinal complications such as gastritis, oesophagitis, abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, and constipation.
  • Figure 3. (a) Clinical view showing stage 3 of osteonecrosis of the jaw in the anterior alveolar bone of the mandible for a patient under intravenous bisphosphonates (based on the classification of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons). (b) A Dental Panoramic Tomograph (DPT) showing a fracture in the symphyseal area of the mandible related to stage 3 osteonecrosis of the jaw (based on the classification of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons).

    Denosumab

    Denosumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody agent that has been developed in the last decade and reduces osteoclast activity, and so reduces bone breakdown. It is administered as a single subcutaneous injection into the thigh, abdomen or back of the arm with a recommended dosage of 120 mg every four weeks.37

    Denosumab provides an alternative treatment option to bisphosphonates for patients with MM.38 It has been shown to produce less renal toxicity than zoledronic acid. Additionally, it has been reported that denosumab produces fewer skeletal-related events in comparison to zoledronic acid and can lead to a greater reduction in the bone turnover markers.38

    People undergoing invasive dental procedures still have a risk of developing osteonecrosis of the jaw. Therefore, a dental assessment prior to starting therapy is recommended. There has been some debate on how long denosumab stays in the bone, and whether, following a ‘drug holiday’ for six months, the risk of osteonecrosis of the jaw after extractions is significantly reduced, which would be an advantage over zoledronic acid.39

    Surgery

    The skeletal site most often affected by MM is the spine.40 Treatment helps control the disease. It does not repair any structural damage that may have already occurred with a fracture or prevent deterioration of the condition. Two surgical procedures, vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty, are used to treat spinal fractures.41 By stabilizing the bone, these procedures address the structural damage seen with spinal fractures, relieve pain, and improve function and quality of life.

    Oral and maxillofacial manifestation

    Osteolytic jaw lesion

    Five to thirty percent of MM patients have bony lesions in the mandible and maxilla.40 Dental care providers may be the first to come across undiagnosed cases from incidental findings. Although it is uncommon, 14% of patients have oral lesions as the first sign of the disease.42 For example, jaws can be affected, and patients may present with pain, bony swelling, epulis formation, or sudden tooth/teeth movement.43,44 Bony lesions are more common in the mandible than in the maxilla, and have a higher prevalence in the posterior regions of the jaws. This could be partly explained by the fact that the greatest haematopoietic activity is in the posterior parts of the mandible when compared to other sites in the jaws. Punched out lesions are the classical radiological appearance, which are unrelated to the teeth apices.45 Multiple lesions in the skull are more common than in the jaws with ill-defined margins and a lack of circumferential definition.46

    Amyloidosis

    Amyloidosis is a group of rare but serious conditions caused by deposits of abnormal protein, called amyloid, in tissues and organs throughout the body.47 Although oral amyloidosis is rare to appear as a first symptom of MM, dental care providers should be aware of its appearance. It may appear as papules, nodules or plaques, which are most commonly seen on the tongue.48 This can interfere with speech, chewing and swallowing. In rare cases, amyloidosis in the tongue might appear as macroglossia.48 If there is amyloid deposition in the salivary glands, patients may experience a dry mouth.49 Therefore, dental care providers will need to provide comprehensive management plans to help reduce the effects of dry mouth, which include an increased risk of caries and effects on eating, speech and swallowing. The appearance of amyloid lesions in oral soft tissues indicate poor overall survival rate and the median survival time in these patients is approximately four months if it is untreated.50 All patients with suspicious lesions should be referred for urgent attention to a specialist centre to ensure early diagnosis and therefore improve quality of life.51

    Dental considerations

    Oral and dental assessment prior to starting antiresorptive medications

    Patients with MM treated with antiresorptive medications, whether bisphosphonates or denosumab, are at high risk of developing osteonecrosis of the jaw. The overall prevalence of osteonecrosis of the jaw is 5.2% for MM patients.52 The general dental practitioner (GDP) should liaise with the oral surgery/special care dentistry specialist and the patient's haematologist with regards to clinical assessment and treatment planning.53 Extraction of teeth of poor prognosis should be carried out urgently before the patient starting any antiresorptive medication such as zoledronic acid or denosumab. Four weeks is the minimum time recommended for healing before starting therapy. In addition, excellent oral care should be instigated with regular dental reviews to avoid future extractions. A further study showed a reduction in the incidence of osteonecrosis of the jaw to be 1.3% after implementing a preventive dental programme for MM patients.54

    Tendency of bleeding

    Achieving optimal haemostasis can be a challenge in patients with MM due to thrombocytopenia, platelet dysfunction, and hyperviscosity.55 Liaison with the patient's haematologist is essential to obtain recent pre-operative blood results and arrange platelet transfusions if necessary. Non-invasive dental procedures, such as supra-gingival scaling and simple dental restorations, are usually not problematic, rarely cause a bleeding problem, and can be managed in a primary care centre. While more invasive dental procedures, such as subgingival scaling (root surface debridement), and dental extraction, may be carried out in a primary care centre only after liaison with the patient's specialist.56 No dental extraction should be performed if the platelet count is less than 50 x 109/L. An inferior alveolar nerve block is not recommended if the platelet count is less than 30 x 109/L.56 However, urgent dental treatment for patients with thrombocytopenia (<50 x 109/L) should be carried out in a secondary care centre.56

    Susceptibility to infection

    People with MM have myelosuppression of the bone marrow with neutropenia and dysfunctional lymphocytes.57 This is related to the disease or secondary to the chemotherapeutic agents, which may have been started urgently. They are at an increased risk to infections. Liaison with the patient's haematologist prior to dental extraction is essential to assess neutrophil counts. It is recommended not to perform dental extraction if the neutrophil level is <1, 000/mm3.58 In such a case, dental extraction should be carried out in a secondary care centre after liaison with a patient's haematologist as further medical interventions, such as antibiotic prophylaxis or Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factors (G-CSFs) may be required.56

    Corticosteroid therapy

    Patients with MM often receive high-dose systemic steroidal therapy (ie 20mg of dexamethasone) for a long time (at least 3 months) as part of their chemotherapy regimen.59 This can lead to adrenal insufficiency. Adrenocortical function is likely to be suppressed if the patient is currently on daily systemic corticosteroid at doses of/or above 10 mg Prednisolone, or has been in the last 3 months.56 These patients are unable to adapt to stress physiologically and may need supplemental steroid therapy when having dental procedures to prevent adrenal crisis. Non-invasive dental procedures, such as dental restorations, root canal treatment and scaling and polishing, do not usually require steroid supplementation.60 However, a GDP should assess patients individually and liaise with the patient's haematologist as steroid supplement will vary.

    A more invasive dental procedure, such as dental extraction under local anaesthesia, requires steroid supplementation prior to the procedure, and possibly for up to 24 hours afterwards. A suggested double dose of hydrocortisone should be taken one hour prior to surgery, up to a maximum dose of hydrocortisone 20 mg (or equivalent glucocorticoid).60 If the patient requires multiple dental extractions under general anaesthesia, he/she will be managed in a secondary care centre, with intravenous hydrocortisone pre-operatively. Discussion with the patient and liaison with the patient's haematologist in advance of the dental procedure is vital to plan required steroid therapy in relation to the type and timing of the procedure.

    Conscious sedation and general anaesthesia

    Conscious sedation and general anaesthesia help to reduce anxiety during dental treatment. If conscious sedation or general anaesthesia is to be considered, it is necessary to ensure that the haemoglobin level is adequate. Scully et al recommended no conscious sedation or general anaesthesia should be carried out when the haemoglobin is less than 10g/dl.56 If urgent dental treatment under either conscious sedation or general anaesthesia is planned, liaising with the patient's haematologist is necessary and patients should be referred to a specialist centre. Anaemia can be managed by whole blood transfusion for a young patient or packed red cells for an elderly patient.56

    Timing of treatment

    Most patients with MM present with anaemia due to either the myeloma-related symptoms or the treatment. Dental care providers need to be mindful of this and arrange appointments at suitable times. Patients may not be able to tolerate long appointments due to fatigue, and may present with painful ulcers.61 Short dental appointments in the morning are suggested to ensure that the patient is not too fatigued. Patients with frequent blood transfusion should receive dental treatment in a secondary care centre.56

    Dental chair position

    Patients with MM may experience neck and back pain. Careful positioning of the dental chair will therefore be necessary to avoid pressure to the back. It is important to allow time for rest periods during treatment, if required. A head and neck rest or pillow can be used to support the patient's neck and ease pressure on the back during treatment (Table 6).


    Action Recommendation
    Dental chair position Careful positioning in the dental chair with head and neck rest or pillow to avoid any further neck or back pain. Consider short morning appointment.
    Radiographical examination Detailed clinical and radiographical examination of all teeth for caries, pathology, furcation involvement.
    Periodontal examination Examine periodontal status, as this can be a potential risk factor for osteonecrosis of the jaw. It is important to check platelets level prior to basic periodontal examination measurement (BPE) to assess risk of bleeding (no BPE recommended if platelets count is less than 30 x 109/L, therefore the GDP should liaise with the patient's haematologist).
    Treatment plan A suitable treatment plan should be formulated for patients (consider liaison with the oral surgery/special care dentistry specialist).
    Dental extraction All teeth of poor prognosis should be extracted prior to starting treatment with antiresorptive medications (ideally four weeks before). Liaison with the haematologist to check recent blood results prior to extractions. (No dental extraction should be performed if the platelet count is less than 50 x 109/L. An inferior alveolar nerve block is not recommended if the platelet count is less than 30 x 109/L). The GDP should liaise with the patient's haematologist.
    Oral hygiene instructions Thorough oral hygiene instruction discussing the importance of maintaining good oral hygiene using a high fluoride toothpaste (5000 ppm), and regular dental recalls.
    Patient education Patient education about the side-effects of anti-myeloma treatment or any signs of developing MRONJ, such as exposed bone and mandible paraesthesia.
    Diet, smoking, alcohol Emphasis on the importance of a healthy diet, stopping smoking, limiting alcohol intake. It is recommended to discuss with the patient about smoking cessation programme and the negative impacts of the smoking to oral cavity and general health.
    Dental alert card A dental alert card may be useful and is currently being trialled in a specialist dental centre. The card is to be shown to patient's dentist alerting him/her that the patient has received antiresorptive medication and is at risk of MRONJ.
    Follow up It is recommended that patients have a dental review every 3–6 months.
    Oral lesions All patients with suspicious lesions should be referred for urgent attention to a specialist centre to ensure early diagnosis and therefore improve quality of life.
    Liaison Liaise with specialists in oral surgery; special care dentistry and haematology to provide best care for the patient.

    Dentistry and haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT)

    Pre-transplant dental assessment

    Approximately 50,000 people undergo haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) annually worldwide.62 The cytotoxic medication that is given to the patient prior to HSCT results in transient thrombocytopenia and neutropenia that can increase the risk of infection and prolonged bleeding.63 The cytotoxic drugs or the transplant procedure itself may have a direct effect on the oral environment.64 Any dental treatment intended during this period should be discussed with the patient's haematologist.65

    Pre-transplant oral and dental assessment of patients should be carried out by an oral surgeon or special care dentist. The pre-HSCT oral and dental assessment aim to assess the current oral health status and treat teeth with potential sources of infection which might affect the patient during the treatment and post-transplant.66 The oral and dental assessment helps to underline that oral health is stabilized and establish that any extractions have been carried out a minimum of ten days prior to the start of chemotherapy.58

    Post-transplant oral healthcare

    As people survive longer after transplants, they are at risk of developing late complications involving the oral cavity. These can be related to non-treated pre-transplant dental diseases and post-transplant side-effects. These complications can cause substantial morbidity, impair quality of life, and can contribute to late mortality in HSCT recipients.62

    The most important risk factors for oral late complications are oral chronic graft-versus host diseases (cGVHD).67 People often report oral discomfort, oral dryness, pain and difficulty of swallowing that may limit oral intake.62 Squamous cell oral cancer can develop in the buccal mucosa, salivary glands, gingiva, lip or tongue.68,69 All patients with suspicious lesions should be referred for urgent attention to a specialist centre to ensure early diagnosis and therefore improve quality of life.51

    The Centre for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR), the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, and the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation convened a group of experts in 2006 and provided consensus recommendations for screening and preventive practices for autologous and allogeneic HSCT survivors (Table 7).69,70


    Action Recommendations
    Education All HSCT recipients should be educated about preventive oral health and routine dental maintenance.
    Advice Advice on smoking cessation, reduce alcohol intake, avoiding intra–oral piercing, and reduce sugary food and drinks.
    Monitoring Monitoring of oral complications post-transplantation is facilitated by thorough pre-transplant baseline oral assessment by oral surgery/special care dentistry specialist.
    Clinical Evaluation Clinical oral evaluations should be performed at 6 months, 1 year, and yearly thereafter.
    Regular Check-up More frequent evaluations may be needed in patients at high risk for developing cGVHD (decided by the haematologist and oral surgery/special care dentistry specialist).
    Oral Cancer Patients at high risk for squamous cell cancers of the oral cavity (for patients with previous oral cGVHD or Fanconi's anaemia) should undergo clinical oral evaluations every 6 months by oral surgery/special care dentistry specialist and should be educated to maintain good oral hygiene and taught oral self-inspection.
    cGVHD More frequent dental consultations may be considered in patients with oral cGVHD or Fanconi's anaemia. At each visit, it is important to check for a history of xerostomia and high-risk habits and to perform a thorough oral, head and neck, and dental exam.

    Discharge to general dental practitioners (GDPs)

    It is important to advise patients about the long-term complications of anti-myeloma treatment during the pre-dental assessment. Afterwards, discharge to a general dental practice is appropriate. A discharge letter should recommend a dental review every 3–6 months (including those wearing complete dentures), with the provision of a comprehensive preventive programme. It is important to highlight that any procedures that expose or manipulate bone should be avoided, as this will significantly increase risk of osteonecrosis of the jaw.

    Post-discharged patients can receive dental treatment in a primary care centre. However, GDPs are recommended to explore alternative procedures to dental extraction, such as retaining roots in the absence of infection. If a dental extraction is considered necessary, they should consider consulting an oral surgery/special care dentistry specialist with regards to clinical assessment and treatment planning.53 Moreover, GDPs are recommended to discuss the risk of the procedure with the patient to ensure informed consent. It is important to perform the dental extraction as atraumatically as possible, avoid raising flaps and achieve good haemostasis. No antibiotic or antiseptic prophylaxis should be prescribed unless advised by the patient's specialist.53 If the extraction socket is not healed at 8 weeks, it is necessary to refer the patient to an oral surgery/special care dentistry specialist for review.

    Novel approaches, such as using orthodontic elastic bands to exfoliate teeth, are being trialled. This results in a slow extraction over a few weeks, which allows the oral mucosa to migrate down the tooth as it exfoliates so that there is no open wound.71 The use of platelets-rich plasma (PRF) derived from the centrifugation of the patient's own blood is also being trialled. It helps tissue regeneration and accelerates healing in dental and oral surgery, thereby promoting repairing tissue mechanisms.

    Conclusion

    A multidisciplinary approach is required to manage people with MM. The special care dentist is well placed for this, with follow-up in general dental practice. Dental assessment prior to starting antiresorptive medication (bisphosphonate or denosumab) and haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is crucial. The general dental practitioner in primary care should review patients with MM every 3–6 months. This group are at risk of osteonecrosis of the jaw, oral cancer, and cGVHD, therefore early and urgent referral to a specialist centre must be made for any suspicious oral lesions.