References

Ahmad I. Anterior dental aesthetics: dental perspective. Br Dent J. 2005; 199:(3)135-141
Ahmad I. Anterior dental aesthetics: gingival perspective. Br Dent J. 2005; 199:(4)195-202
Ahmad I. Anterior dental aesthetics: dentofacial perspective. Br Dent J. 2005; 199:(2)81-88
Ahmad I. Anterior dental aesthetics: facial perspective. Br Dent J. 2005; 199:(1)15-21
Ahmad I. Anterior dental aesthetics: historical perspective. Br Dent J. 2005; 198:(12)737-742
Magne P, Gallucci GO, Belser UC. Anatomic crown width/length ratios of unworn and worn maxillary teeth in white subjects. J Prosthet Dent. 2003; 89:(5)453-461
Qualtrough AJ, Burke FJ. A look at dental esthetics. Quintessence Int. 1994; 25:(1)7-14
Liebler M, Devigus A, Randall RC, Burke FJ, Pallesen U, Cerutti A Ethics of esthetic dentistry. Quintessence Int. 2004; 35:(6)456-465
Brisman AS. Esthetics: a comparison of dentists' and patients' concepts. J Am Dent Assoc. 1980; 100:(3)345-352
Morley J, Eubank J. Macroesthetic elements of smile design. J Am Dent Assoc. 2001; 132:(1)39-45
Gillen RJ, Schwartz RS, Hilton TJ, Evans DB. An analysis of selected normative tooth proportions. Int J Prosthodont. 1994; 7:(5)410-417
Smales RJ. Effects of enamel-bonding, type of restoration, patient age and operator on the longevity of an anterior composite resin. Am J Dent. 1991; 4:(3)130-133
Redman CD, Hemmings KW, Good JA. The survival and clinical performance of resin-based composite restorations used to treat localised anterior tooth wear. Br Dent J. 2003; 194:(10)566-572
Horn HR. Porcelain laminate veneers bonded to etched enamel. Dent Clin North Am. 1983; 27:(4)671-684
Burke FJ, Lucarotti PS. Ten-year outcome of porcelain laminate veneers placed within the general dental services in England and Wales. J Dent. 2009; 37:(1)31-38
Friedman MJ. A 15-year review of porcelain veneer failure – a clinician's observations. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1998; 19:(6)625-632
Rouse JS. Full veneer versus traditional veneer preparation: a discussion of interproximal extension. J Prosthet Dent. 1997; 78:(6)545-549
Dumfahrt H, Schaffer H. Porcelain laminate veneers. A retrospective evaluation after 1 to 10 years of service: Part II – Clinical results. Int J Prosthodont. 2000; 13:(1)9-18
Garber D. Porcelain laminate veneers: ten years later. Part I: Tooth preparation. J Esthet Dent. 1993; 5:(2)56-62
Saunders WP, Saunders EM. Prevalence of periradicular periodontitis associated with crowned teeth in an adult Scottish subpopulation. Br Dent J. 1998; 185:(3)137-140
Davies SJ, Gray RJ, Qualtrough AJ. Management of tooth surface loss. Br Dent J. 2002; 192:(1)11-6
Capp NJ. Occlusion and splint therapy. Br Dent J. 1999; 186:(5)217-222
Carrier DD. A laboratory technique for custom incisal guidance. J Prosthet Dent. 2001; 86:(5)551-552

Aesthetic treatment related to clinical need – an illustrated case report

From Volume 42, Issue 3, April 2015 | Pages 282-290

Authors

Paul Worskett

Dentist, Amblecote Dental Care, Brierley Hill

Articles by Paul Worskett

Abstract

Aesthetic treatment may be patient driven and usually by a ‘want’, rather than a ‘need’. This paper describes the management of a patient who presented with aesthetic wants and clinical needs, both of which were caused as a result of unsuccessful aesthetic treatment which the patient had received previously. The diagnostic process, discussion of the treatment plan and clinical procedures, which produced a satisfactory result, are described and illustrated.

Clinical Relevance: This case demonstrates that aesthetic treatment may commit the patient to future dental treatment needs, particularly if treatment provided is poorly planned and carried out to an unsatisfactory standard.

Article

The clinical need for treatment is based upon the principle that, whenever treatment is proposed for a patient, the treatment is necessary to secure and maintain the oral health of that patient. A patient may seek out treatment to solve a clinical problem that he/she may be aware of, such as pain, trauma or disease. In such cases, there is a clinical need for treatment, unrelated to aesthetics, and treatment objectives are based on:

In some aesthetic cases, the primary reason for attendance may be to improve the appearance of the patient's mouth and teeth. This may require treatment in an otherwise healthy and stable mouth and, in so doing, any treatment provided is unnecessary from a clinical need point of view. However, there is no reason for the objectives of treatment to deviate from the list presented above.

In an ideal world, any treatment provided for purely aesthetic reasons would not compromise the long-term viability of the teeth or oral health. Unfortunately, we do not live in an ideal world and purely aesthetic treatment carries the risk that, even if carried out to an exceptionally high standard, the teeth may be compromised as a result of intrusive treatment.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available