References

Delivering Better Oral Health: An Evidence-Based Toolkit for Prevention. 2007;
Holloway PJ, Ellwood RP. The prevalence, causes and cosmetic importance of dental fluorosis in the UK: a review. Community Dent Hlth. 1997; 14:148-155
London: MRC; 2002
Chadwick B, Pendry L.London: Office of National Statistics; 2004
Alvarez JA, Rezende KM, Marocho SM, Alves FBT, Celiberti P, Ciamponi AL. Dental fluorosis: exposure, prevention and management. J Clin Exp Dent. 2009; 1:14-18
Burt BA. The changing patterns of systemic fluoride intake. J Dent Res. 1992; 71:1228-1237
Hawley GM, Ellwood RP, Davies RM. Dental caries, fluorosis and the cosmetic implications of different TF scores in 14-year-old adolescents. Community Dent Hlth. 1996; 13:189-192
Rock WP, Sabieha AM. The relationship between reported toothpaste usage in infancy and fluorosis of permanent incisors. Br Dent J. 1997; 183:(5)165-170
An epidimeiological index of developmental defects of dental enamel (DDE Index). Commission on Oral Health, Research and Epidemiology. Int Dent J. 1982; 32:159-167
Thylstrup A, Fejerskov O. Clinical appearance of dental fluorosis in permanent teeth in relation to histological changes. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1978; 6:315-328
Akpata ES. Occurrence and management of dental fluorosis. Int Dent J. 2001; 51:325-333
Loyola-Rodriguez JP, Pozos-Guillen Ade J, Hernandez-Hernandez F, Berumen-Maldonado R, Patiño-Marin N. Effectiveness of treatment with carbamide peroxide and hydrogen peroxide in subjects affected by dental fluorosis: a clinical trial. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2003; 28:63-67
London: The Stationery Office;
Council Directive 2011/84/EU of 20 September 2011 amending Directive 76/768/EEC, concerning cosmetic products for the purpose of adapting Annex III thereto to technical progress. Official Journal of the European Union. L 283:36-38
London: The Stationery Office;
Bertassoni LE, Martin JM, Torno V, Vieira S, Rached RN, Mazur RF. In-office dental bleaching and enamel microabrasion for fluorosis treatment. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2008; 32:185-187
Ardu S, Stavridakis M, Krejci I. A minimally invasive treatment of severe dental fluorosis. Quintessence Int. 2007; 38:455-458

Dental fluorosis in the paediatric patient

From Volume 40, Issue 10, December 2013 | Pages 836-839

Authors

Gahder-Sara Atia

BDS, MFDS

Orthodontic Specialist Registrar, Manchester Dental Hospital, Higher Cambridge Street, Manchester M15 6FH, UK

Articles by Gahder-Sara Atia

Joanna May

BDS, BMedSci MFDS

Specialty Registrar in Paediatric Dentistry, Birmingham Dental Hospital, St Chad's Queensway, Birmingham, B4 6NN, UK

Articles by Joanna May

Abstract

Exposure to excessive fluoride intake during the early childhood years can disrupt the normal development of enamel, resulting in dental fluorosis. This varies in severity, ranging from white opacities in mild cases to more severe black and brown discoloration or enamel pitting. This article aims to give the reader a better understanding of the aetiology, diagnosis and subsequent treatment of dental fluorosis in the paediatric patient.

Clinical Relevance: Fluorosis can have a marked effect on dental aesthetics. The prevalence of fluorosis in the United Kingdom may increase following the publication of Delivering Better Oral Health, published by the Department of Health in 2007,1 which suggested changes to fluoride levels in children's toothpastes. This article highlights the importance of accurate diagnosis of fluorosis and also explains the treatment options available to paediatric patients.

Article

Dental fluorosis is defined as a developmental disturbance of the enamel structure, caused by excessive exposure to high concentrations of fluoride. This results in a reduction of the mineral content of the enamel, and subsequently an increase in enamel porosity.

The spectrum of clinical presentation ranges from small white opaque areas of enamel to more severe discoloration, including black and brown stains. The enamel may also be pitted and rough in appearance. More severe fluorosis is less prevalent than the milder forms.

It is difficult to give an accurate figure of the prevalence of fluorosis in the United Kingdom. A review by Holloway and Ellwood found that 40% of the UK population are likely to have enamel defects and approximately half of these (20% of the population) are likely to have dental fluorosis, mainly in its mildest forms.2 Studies by the Medical Research Council, and other researchers who have found the prevalence of fluorosis of aesthetic concern, have found it to be 1% of the population in non-fluoridated areas and 3–4% in fluoridated areas.3 The 2003 UK Child Dental Health Survey found a 1% prevalence of aesthetically concerning fluorosis throughout the UK.4

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available