References

Baccetti T A controlled study of associated dental anomalies. Angle Orthod. 1998; 68:267-274
Groper JN Macrodontia of a single tooth: review of literature and report of case. J Am Dent Assoc. 1987; 114
Brook AH Dental anomalies of number, form and size: their prevalence in British schoolchildren. J Int Assoc Dent Child. 1974; 5:37-53
Ooshima T, Ishida R, Mishima K, Sobue S The prevalence of developmental anomalies of teeth and their association with tooth size in the primary and permanent dentitions of 1650 Japanese children. Int J Paediatr Dent. 1996; 6:87-94
Rajab LD, Hamdan MA Supernumerary teeth: review of the literature and a survey of 152 cases. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2002; 12:244-254
Dugmore CR Bilateral macrodontia of mandibular second premolars: a case report. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2001; 11:69-73
Thomas MB, Greenhalgh CM, Addy L ‘Double-veneers’ – a novel approach to treating macrodontia. Dent Update. 2008; 35:479-484
Fleming PS, Xavier GM, DiBiase AT, Cobourne MT Revisiting the supernumerary: the epidemiological and molecular basis of extra teeth. Br Dent J. 2010; 208:25-30
Brook AH A unifying aetiological explanation for anomalies of human tooth number and size. Arch Oral Biol. 1984; 29:373-378
Brook AH, Elcock C, Aggarwal M Tooth dimensions in hypodontia with a known PAX9 mutation. Arch Oral Biol. 2009; 54:S57-62
Khalaf K, Robinson DL, Elcock C, Smith RN, Brook AH Tooth size in patients with supernumerary teeth and a control group measured by image analysis system. Arch Oral Biol. 2005; 50:243-248
Khalaf K, Smith RN, Elcock C, Brook AH Multiple crown size variables of the upper incisors in patients with supernumerary teeth compared with controls. Arch Oral Biol. 2009; 54:S71-S78
Bishara SE Impacted maxillary canines: a review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992; 101:159-171
Chadwick SM, Kilpatrick NM Late development of supernumerary teeth: a report of two cases. Int J Paediatr Dent. 1993; 3:205-210
Cho SY, So FH, Lee CK, Chan JC Late forming supernumerary tooth in the premaxilla: a case report. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2000; 10:335-340
Aguilo L, Gandia JL Late development of maxillary supernumerary tooth: a case report. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 1997; 22:41-44

Is there a relationship between increased tooth number and increased tooth size? a case report

From Volume 41, Issue 6, July 2014 | Pages 542-544

Authors

Jadbinder Seehra

BDS(Hons), MFDS, MSc, MOrth, FDS

Senior House Officer, Unit of Oral Medicine, The School of Dentistry, University of Manchester, Higher Cambridge Street, Manchester, M15 6FH, UK

Articles by Jadbinder Seehra

Mike Harrison

BDS, FDS(Paed Dent)(Edin), MScD, MPhil

Consultant in Paediatric Dentistry, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Orthodontics and Paediatrics

Articles by Mike Harrison

Martyn T Cobourne

FDS RCS, FDS(Orth) RCS, PhD

Senior Lecturer/Hon Consultant in Orthodontics, Department of Orthodontics and Craniofacial Development, Floor 22 Guy's Hospital, GKT Dental Institute, King's College London, London SEI 9RT, UK

Articles by Martyn T Cobourne

Abstract

A unifying theory has been proposed that links anomalies of tooth size and number. Application of this theory suggests that anomalies of tooth size and number may share a common aetiology but could also be predicted. This article highlights an association between macrodontia and hyperdontia as demonstrated by two clinical cases. These cases demonstrate a localized association and effect on the dentition and highlight the possible predictive application of this theory.

Clinical Relevance: Clinicians should be made aware of the possibility of supernumeraries associated with macrodont teeth.

Article

A number of dental anomalies exist that involve the formation of increased amounts of hard tissue. In particular, these include both macrodontia and supernumerary teeth, which appear to occur as distinct entities.1 Macrodontia or increased tooth size can be classified as true or relative, and can be generalized or isolated.2 The incidence of macrodontia in the permanent dentition ranges from 1.1% to 1.9%, depending upon the population studied,3,4 but is more common in the primary dentition.3 Supernumerary teeth are those present in addition to the normal complement within the dentition and occur with an incidence of around 0.1–3.8%, being more common in the permanent dentition.5 Despite these fundamental epidemiological differences, a number of features are seen that are common between these two conditions, which include a higher prevalence in males than females,3,5 unilateral or bilateral distribution,5,6 and occurrence within both dental arches.5,6,7 Both genetic and environmental factors have been implicated in the aetiology of both anomalies.8,9

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available