References

Kakehashi S, Stanley HR, Fitzgerald RJ The effects of surgical exposures of dental pulps in germ-free and conventional laboratory rats. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1965; 20:340-349 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(65)90166-0
Moller AJ, Fabricius L, Dahlen G Influence on peri-apical tissues of indigenous oral bacteria and necrotic pulp tissue in monkeys. Scand J Dent Res. 1981; 89:475-484 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.1981.tb01711.x
Fabricius L, Dahlen G, Holm SE, Moller AJ Influence of combinations of oral bacteria on peri-apical tissues of monkeys. Scand J Dent Res. 1982; 90:200-206 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.1982.tb00728.x
Chavez de Paz L, Svensater G, Dahlen G, Bergenholtz G Streptococci from root canals in teeth with apical periodontitis receiving endodontic treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005; 100:232-241 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2004.10.008
Chavez De Paz LE, Dahlen G, Molander A Bacteria recovered from teeth with apical periodontitis after antimicrobial endodontic treatment. Int Endod J. 2003; 36:500-508 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.13652591.2003.00686.x
Chavez de Paz LE, Molander A, Dahlen G Gram-positive rods prevailing in teeth with apical periodontitis undergoing root canal treatment. Int Endod J. 2004; 37:579-587 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00845.x
Siqueira JF, Rocas IN Molecular analysis of endodontic infections, 2nd edn. In: Fouad AF : John Wiley; 2017
Patel JB 16S rRNA gene sequencing for bacterial pathogen identification in the clinical laboratory. Mol Diagn. 2001; 6:313-321 https://doi.org/10.1054/modi.2001.29158
Clarridge JE Impact of 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis for identification of bacteria on clinical microbiology and infectious diseases. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004; 17:840-862 https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.17.4.840-862.2004
Rolph HJ, Lennon A, Riggio MP Molecular identification of micro-organisms from endodontic infections. J Clin Microbiol. 2001; 39:3282-3289 https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.39.9.3282-3289.2001
Trowbridge H, Kim S Pulp development, structure and function. In: Cohen S, Burns R St Louis, MO, USA: Mosby; 1998
Jafarzadeh H, Abbott PV Review of pulp sensibility tests. Part I: general information and thermal tests. Int Endod J. 2010; 43:738-762 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.13652591.2010.01754.x
Gopikrishna V, Pradeep G, Venkateshbabu N Assessment of pulp vitality: a review. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2009; 19:3-15 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-263X.2008.00955.x
Mainkar A, Kim SG Diagnostic accuracy of 5 dental pulp tests: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod. 2018; 44:694-702 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2018.01.021
College of General Dentistry. Selection criteria for dental radiography. 2018. https://cgdent.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/FGDP-SCDR-ALL-Web.pdf
Nekoofar MH, Ghandi MM, Hayes SJ, Dummer PM The fundamental operating principles of electronic root canal length measurement devices. Int Endod J. 2006; 39:595-609 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.13652591.2006.01131.x
Whaites EJ, 3rd edn. : Churchill Livingstone; 2002
Sjögren U, Figdor D, Persson S, Sundqvist G Influence of infection at the time of root filling on the outcome of endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis. Int Endod J. 1997; 30:297-306 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.1997.00092.x
Sundqvist G, Figdor D, Persson S, Sjögren U Microbiologic analysis of teeth with failed endodontic treatment and the outcome of conservative re-treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1998; 85:86-93 https://doi.org/10.1016/s1079-2104(98)90404-8
Ramani A, Sangwan P, Tewari S Comparative evaluation of complete and partial pulpotomy in mature permanent teeth with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: a randomized clinical trial. Int Endod J. 2022; 55:430-440 https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13714
Iaculli F, Rodriguez-Lozano FJ, Briseno-Marroquin B Vital pulp therapy of permanent teeth with reversible or irreversible pulpitis: an overview of the literature. J Clin Med. 2022; 11 https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11144016
Taha NA, Al-Rawash MH, Imran ZA Outcome of full pulpotomy in mature permanent molars using 3 calcium silicatebased materials: a parallel, double blind, randomized controlled trial. Int Endod J. 2022; 55:416-429 https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13707
Ruddle CJ Endodontic triad for success: the role of minimally invasive technology. Dent Today. 2015; 34
Zupanc J, Vahdat-Pajouh N, Schafer E New thermomechanically treated NiTi alloys – a review. Int Endod J. 2018; 51:1088-1103 https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12924
Ingle JI A standardized endodontic technique utilizing newly designed instruments and filling materials. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1961; 14:83-91 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(61)90477-7
Weine FS, Kelly RF, Lio PJ The effect of preparation procedures on original canal shape and on apical foramen shape. J Endod. 1975; 1:255-262 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(75)80037-9
Schilder H Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dent Clin North Am. 1974; 18:269-296
Abou-Rass M, Frank AL, Glick DH The anticurvature filing method to prepare the curved root canal. J Am Dent Assoc. 1980; 101:792-794 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1980.0427
Morgan LF, Montgomery S An evaluation of the crown-down pressureless technique. J Endod. 1984; 10:491-498 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(84)80207-1
Goerig AC, Michelich RJ, Schultz HH Instrumentation of root canals in molar using the step-down technique. J Endod. 1982; 8:550-554 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(82)80015-0
Fava LR The double-flared technique: an alternative for biomechanical preparation. J Endod. 1983; 9:76-80 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(83)80080-6
Roane JB, Sabala CL, Duncanson MG The ‘balanced force’ concept for instrumentation of curved canals. J Endod. 1985; 11:203-211 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(85)80061-3
Saunders WP, Saunders EM Effect of noncutting tipped instruments on the quality of root canal preparation using a modified double-flared technique. J Endod. 1992; 18:32-36 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81140-4
Torabinejad M Passive step-back technique. A sequential use of ultrasonic and hand instruments. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1994; 77:402-405 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(94)90204-6
DiVito E, Peters OA, Olivi G Effectiveness of the erbium:YAG laser and new design radial and stripped tips in removing the smear layer after root canal instrumentation. Lasers Med Sci. 2012; 27:273-280 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-010-0858-x
Blanken J, De Moor RJ, Meire M, Verdaasdonk R Laser induced explosive vapor and cavitation resulting in effective irrigation of the root canal. Part 1: a visualization study. Lasers Surg Med. 2009; 41:514-519 https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.20798
Matsumoto H, Yoshimine Y, Akamine A Visualization of irrigant flow and cavitation induced by Er:YAG laser within a root canal model. J Endod. 2011; 37:839-843 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.02.035
de Groot SD, Verhaagen B, Versluis M Laser-activated irrigation within root canals: cleaning efficacy and flow visualization. Int Endod J. 2009; 42:1077-1083 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.13652591.2009.01634.x
Galler KM, Grubmuller V, Schlichting R Penetration depth of irrigants into root dentine after sonic, ultrasonic and photoacoustic activation. Int Endod J. 2019; 52:1210-1217 https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13108
O'Neill JF, Hope CK, Wilson M Oral bacteria in multi-species biofilms can be killed by red light in the presence of toluidine blue. Lasers Surg Med. 2002; 31:86-90 https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.10087
Lane J, Bonsor S Survival rates of teeth treated with bacterial photo-dynamic therapy during disinfection of the root canal system. Br Dent J. 2019; 226:333-339 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-019-0026-z
Saunders WP, Saunders EM Conventional endodontics and the operating microscope. Dent Clin North Am. 1997; 41:415-428
Carr GB Microscopes in endodontics. J Calif Dent Assoc. 1992; 20:55-61
Haapasalo M, Shen Y, Wang Z, Gao Y Irrigation in endodontics. Br Dent J. 2014; 216:299-303 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2014.204
Kuruvilla JR, Kamath MP Antimicrobial activity of 2.5% sodium hypochlorite and 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate separately and combined, as endodontic irrigants. J Endod. 1998; 24:472-476 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(98)80049-6
Leonardo MR, Tanomaru Filho M, Silva LA In vivo antimicrobial activity of 2% chlorhexidine used as a root canal irrigating solution. J Endod. 1999; 25:167-171 https://doi.org/10.1016/s0099-2399(99)80135-6
Violich DR, Chandler NP The smear layer in endodontics – a review. Int Endod J. 2010; 43:2-15 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.13652591.2009.01627.x
McComb D, Smith DC A preliminary scanning electron microscopic study of root canals after endodontic procedures. J Endod. 1975; 1:238-242 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(75)80226-3
Dutner J, Mines P, Anderson A Irrigation trends among American Association of Endodontists members: a web-based survey. J Endod. 2012; 38:37-40 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.08.013
Gottardi W Iodine and iodine compounds. In: Block SS Philadelphia, PA, USA: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2001
Bonsor SJ Disinfection of the root canal system: what should the protocol be?. Dent Update. 2021; 48:836-844
Martin H, Cunningham W Endosonic endodontics: the ultrasonic synergistic system. Int Dent J. 1984; 34:198-203
Nusstein JM Sonic and ultrasonic irrigation. In: Basrani B Switzerland: Springer; 2015
Susila A, Minu J Activated irrigation vs. conventional non-activated irrigation in endodontics – a systematic review. Eur Endod J. 2019; 4:96-110 https://doi.org/10.14744/eej.2019.80774
Mozo S, Llena C, Forner L Review of ultrasonic irrigation in endodontics: increasing action of irrigating solutions. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012; 17:e512-516 https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.17621
van der Sluis LW, Shemesh H, Wu MK, Wesselink PR An evaluation of the influence of passive ultrasonic irrigation on the seal of root canal fillings. Int Endod J. 2007; 40:356-361 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01227.x
Zeng C, Willison J, Meghil MM Antibacterial efficacy of an endodontic sonic-powered irrigation system: An in vitro study. J Dent. 2018; 75:105-112 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2018.06.003
Neelakantan P, Romero M, Vera J Biofilms in endodontics-current status and future directions. Int J Mol Sci. 2017; 18 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18081748
Socransky SS, Haffajee AD Dental biofilms: difficult therapeutic targets. Periodontol 2000. 2002; 28:12-55 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0757.2002.280102.x
Bystrom A, Claesson R, Sundqvist G The antibacterial effect of camphorated paramonochlorophenol, camphorated phenol and calcium hydroxide in the treatment of infected root canals. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1985; 1:170-175 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.1985.tb00652.x
Orstavik D, Kerekes K, Molven O Effects of extensive apical reaming and calcium hydroxide dressing on bacterial infection during treatment of apical periodontitis: a pilot study. Int Endod J. 1991; 24:1-7 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1991.tb00863.x
Sjögren U, Figdor D, Spångberg L, Sundqvist G The antimicrobial effect of calcium hydroxide as a shortterm intracanal dressing. Int Endod J. 1991; 24:119-125 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1991.tb00117.x
Sathorn C, Parashos P, Messer H Antibacterial efficacy of calcium hydroxide intracanal dressing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Endod J. 2007; 40:2-10 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.13652591.2006.01197.x
Fava LR, Saunders WP Calcium hydroxide pastes: classification and clinical indications. Int Endod J. 1999; 32:257-282 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.13652591.1999.00232.x
Ordinola-Zapata R, Noblett WC, Perez-Ron A Present status and future directions of intracanal medicaments. Int Endod J. 2022; 55:(Suppl 3)613-636 https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13731
Peng L, Ye L, Tan H, Zhou X Outcome of root canal obturation by warm gutta-percha versus cold lateral condensation: a meta-analysis. J Endod. 2007; 33:106-109 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.09.010
Johnson WB A new gutta-percha technique. J Endod. 1978; 4:184-188 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(78)80173-3
Chybowski EA, Glickman GN, Patel Y Clinical outcome of non-surgical root canal treatment using a single-cone technique with endosequence bioceramic sealer: a retrospective analysis. J Endod. 2018; 44:941-945 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2018.02.01969
Zavattini A, Knight A, Foschi F, Mannocci F Outcome of root canal treatments using a new calcium silicate root canal sealer: a non-randomized clinical trial. J Clin Med. 2020; 9 https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9030782
Tay FR, Pashley DH Monoblocks in root canals: a hypothetical or a tangible goal. J Endod. 2007; 33:391-398 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.10.009
Duncan HF, Galler KM European Society of Endodontology position statement: Management of deep caries and the exposed pulp. Int Endod J. 2019; 52:923-934 https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13080
Galler KM, Krastl G, Simon S European Society of Endodontology position statement: revitalization procedures. Int Endod J. 2016; 49:717-723 https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12629
Camilleri J Sealers and warm gutta-percha obturation techniques. J Endod. 2015; 41:72-78 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.06.007
Witherspoon DE, Small JC, Regan JD, Nunn M Retrospective analysis of open apex teeth obturated with mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod. 2008; 34:1171-1176 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.07.005
Saunders WP A prospective clinical study of peri-radicular surgery using mineral trioxide aggregate as a root-end filling. J Endod. 2008; 34:660-665 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.03.002
Bonsor SJ, Camilleri J Hydraulic cements for various intra-coronal applications: Part 1. Dent Update. 2021; 48:653-660 https://doi.org/10.12968/denu.2021.48.8.653
Bonsor SJ, Camilleri J Hydraulic cements for various applications in endodontics: Part 2. Dent Update. 2021; 48:662-668 https://doi.org/10.12968/denu.2021.48.8.662
Saunders WP, Saunders EM Coronal leakage as a cause of failure in rootcanal therapy: a review. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1994; 10:105-108 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.1994.tb00533.x
Hommez GM, Coppens CR, De Moor RJ Periapical health related to the quality of coronal restorations and root fillings. Int Endod J. 2002; 35:680-689 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2002.00546.x
Al-Nuaimi N, Ciapryna S, Chia M A prospective study on the effect of coronal tooth structure loss on the 4-year clinical survival of root canal retreated teeth and retrospective validation of the Dental Practicality Index. Int Endod J. 2020; 53:1040-1049 https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13322
Murphy F, McDonald A, Petrie A Coronal tooth structure in root-treated teeth prepared for complete and partial coverage restorations. J Oral Rehabil. 2009; 36:451-461 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.01952.x
Edelhoff D, Sorensen JA Tooth structure removal associated with various preparation designs for posterior teeth. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2002; 22:241-249
Al-Fouzan AF, Tashkandi EA Volumetric measurements of removed tooth structure associated with various preparation designs. Int J Prosthodont. 2013; 26:545-548 https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.3221
McGrath CE, Bonsor SJ Survival of direct resin composite onlays and indirect tooth-coloured adhesive onlays in posterior teeth: a systematic review. Br Dent J. 2022; https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-022-4395-3
Martins MD, Junqueira RB, de Carvalho RF Is a fiber post better than a metal post for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2021; 112 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103750
Tortorici S, Difalco P, Caradonna L, Tete S Traditional endodontic surgery versus modern technique: a 5-year controlled clinical trial. J Craniofac Surg. 2014; 25:804-807 https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000000398
Tsesis I, Rosen E, Taschieri S Outcomes of surgical endodontic treatment performed by a modern technique: an updated meta-analysis of the literature. J Endod. 2013; 39:332-339 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.11.044
Ng YL, Mann V, Gulabivala K A prospective study of the factors affecting outcomes of nonsurgical root canal treatment: part 1: peri-apical health. Int Endod J. 2011; 44:583-609 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.13652591.2011.01872.x

Endodontic Update: 50 years of progress

From Volume 50, Issue 5, May 2023 | Pages 411-420

Authors

Stephen J Bonsor

BDS(Hons) MSc FHEA FDS RCPS(Glasg) FDFTEd FCGDent GDP

The Dental Practice, 21 Rubislaw Terrace, Aberdeen; Hon Senior Clinical Lecturer, Institute of Dentistry, University of Aberdeen; Online Tutor/Clinical Lecturer, University of Edinburgh, UK.

Articles by Stephen J Bonsor

William P Saunders

BDS DSc (hc) PhD FRCSEd (hon) FDS RCS Edin FDS RCPS Glas FDS RCS Eng MRD FHEA FDTFEd FCDSHK

Professor of Endodontology/Hon Consultant in Restorative Dentistry, Unit of Restorative Dentistry, Dundee Dental Hospital and School, Dundee, UK

Articles by William P Saunders

Abstract

The science of endodontology and the practice of endodontics have changed immeasurably in the last 50 years. Improved understanding of the aetiology of peri-radicular diseases, in particular the central role of micro-organisms, has driven a more biological approach to treatment. Advances in technology have brought to market sophisticated armamentaria that have facilitated and enhanced clinical delivery. The development of biomaterials and the refinement of clinical techniques have contributed to improved outcomes for both non-surgical and surgical endodontic treatments. The present article summarizes the changes in this field in the past 50 years, and updates the reader on contemporary clinical endodontic practice.

CPD/Clinical Relevance: An awareness of historical developments in the field of endodontics provides useful context and an increased understanding of current practices

Article

The practice of endodontics has changed markedly in the past 50 years. This may be attributed to a better understanding of the aetiology of endodontic pathology, in particular the realization of the central role of micro-organisms in the disease process. This has led to a more biological approach to treatment, facilitated by new technologies comprising hi-tech equipment, the development of dental materials and biomaterials and the refinement of clinical techniques. The present article aims to chart the advancements in the field of endodontics over the past 50 years and illustrate how these improvements have simplified clinical technique, contributing to enhanced treatment outcomes.

A little over 50 years ago, in 1965, the first study that showed that the presence of micro-organisms was required for peri-radicular pathology to develop in gnotobiotic animals was published.1 Subsequent work in the early 1980s demonstrated that infected teeth in a monkey model developed peri-apical lesions whereas non-infected teeth did not2 and the significant role of anaerobes was understood.3 It has now been established that a primary endodontic infection is polymicrobial with aerobes, facultative anaerobes and strict anaerobes present, with the anaerobic species predominating with little microbial specificity. The composition in terms of number of species and species type varies as to the site in the root canal system and whether the case is a primary or secondary treatment.4,5,6

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available