References

Mejàre I, Kallestal C, Stenlund H. Incidence and progression of approximal caries from 11 to 22 years of age in Sweden: a prospective radiographic study. Caries Res. 1999; 33:93-100
Mejàre I, Kallestal C, Stenlund H, Johansson H. Caries development from 11 to 22 years of age: a prospective radiographic study. Prevalence and distribution. Caries Res. 1998; 32:10-16
Qvist V. Longevity of restorations: the ‘death spiral’. In: Fejerskov O, Kidd EAM (eds). Oxford: Blackwell Munksgaard; 2008
Paris S, Meyer-Lueckel H, Kielbassa AM. Resin infiltration of natural caries lesions. J Dent Res. 2007; 86:662-666
Meyer-Lueckel H, Paris S, Kielbassa AM. Surface layer erosion of natural caries lesions with phosphoric and hydrochloric acid gels in preparation for resin infiltration. Caries Res. 2007; 41:223-230
Pitts NB, Longbottom C. Temporary tooth separation with special reference to the diagnosis and preventive management of equivocal approximal carious lesions. Quintessence Int. 1987; 18:563-573
Meyer-Lueckel H, Bitter K, Paris S. Randomized controlled clinical trial on proximal caries infiltration – three-year follow-up. Caries Res. 2012; 46:544-548
Paris S, Hopfenmuller W, Meyer-Lueckel H. Resin infiltration of caries lesions: an efficacy randomized trial. J Dent Res. 2010; 89:823-826
Ekstrand KR, Bakhshandeh A, Martignon S. Treatment of proximal superficial caries lesions on primary molar teeth with resin infiltration and fluoride varnish versus fluoride varnish only: efficacy after 1 year. Caries Res. 2010; 44:41-46
Paris S, Bitter K, Naumann M, Dorfer CE, Meyer-Lueckel H. Resin infiltration of proximal caries lesions differing in ICDAS codes. Eur J Oral Sci. 2011; 119:182-186
Paris S, Meyer-Lueckel H. Masking of labial enamel white spot lesions by resin infiltration – a clinical report. Quintessence Int. 2009; 40:713-718
Kidd EAM, Fejerskov O. What constitutes dental caries? Histopathology of carious enamel and dentin related to the action of cariogenic biofilms. J Dent Res. 2004; 83:C35-C38
Kim S, Kim EY, Jeong TS, Kim JW. The evaluation of resin infiltration for masking labial enamel white spot lesions. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2011; 21:241-248
Meyer-Lueckel H, Fejerskov O, Paris S. [Novel treatment options for proximal caries]. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 2009; 119:454-461
Paris S, Dörfer C, Meyer-Lückel H. Kariesinfiltration. Zahnärztliche Mitteilungen. 2011; 101:38-41

The potential for resin infiltration technique in dental practice

From Volume 39, Issue 9, November 2012 | Pages 623-628

Authors

Sebastian Paris

DDS, PhD

Associate Professor, Clinic for Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, School of Dental Medicine, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Germany

Articles by Sebastian Paris

Hendrik Meyer-Lueckel

DDS, PhD, MPH

Head of Department, Department of Operative Dentistry, Periodontology and Preventive Dentistry, RWTH Aachen University, Germany

Articles by Hendrik Meyer-Lueckel

Abstract

Caries infiltration is a micro-invasive treatment to arrest non-cavitated caries lesions. The method is based on the penetration of low-viscosity light-curing resins, so called infiltrants, into the pores within the enamel lesion. That way, diffusion pathways for cariogenic acids are occluded, resulting in a reduction or even arrest of lesion progression. A positive side-effect of caries infiltration is that lesions change their optical properties and appear similar to sound enamel. Therefore, caries infiltration can also be used to camouflage aesthetically disfiguring white spot lesions on buccal surfaces.

Clinical Relevance: Resin infiltration is a micro-invasive treatment to arrest and to camouflage non-cavitated proximal caries lesions that virtually bridges non-invasive and restorative treatment options.

Article

The caries decline observed in many nations in the past decades has led to the clinical observation that today's adolescents and young adults present many fewer open cavities compared with the generation of their parents or grandparents. However, a high number of caries lesions in earlier stages, particularly in proximal surfaces, can still be observed in these patients. This shift to earlier stages should not be misinterpreted to suggest that these individuals do not need therapeutic (non-invasive) intervention anymore, because many of the non-cavitated lesions progress to cavitated stages.1,2 Rather, these epidemiological changes present a challenge not only to diagnose but also to manage these lesions to avoid their further progression.

The treatments of choice for early non-cavitated caries lesions are non-invasive interventions that support the natural repair processes of the oral cavity. However, these approaches usually depend on good compliance and a sustained change of a patient's habits (eg oral hygiene, diet) and therefore seem to have only limited effectiveness. Invasive treatment may bring the tooth into a ‘death spiral of restorations’ in which more and more tooth tissue gets lost when restorations are often replaced, even resulting in loss of tooth vitality or even extraction of the tooth.3 For this reason, the first restorative intervention should be postponed as long as possible. Particularly for proximal lesions, the collateral damage during cavity preparation is high because relatively large amounts of sound tissue have to be removed to get access to the lesion. Therefore, for proximal caries lesions radiographically extending around the enamel dentine junction, the treatment decision is often difficult. Similar to caries sealing of occlusal surfaces, caries infiltration aims to bridge non-invasive and restorative interventions for proximal caries lesions, providing a minimum of tissue destruction, with the objective of arresting the caries process (Figure 1).

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available