References

Fejerskov O, Kidd E. Preface: an editor's guide to reading the book.Oxford: Blackwell Munksgaard; 2008
Sheiham A. Dental caries affects body weight, growth and quality of life in pre-school children. Br Dent J. 2006; 201:625-626
van Gemert-Schriks MC, van Amerongen EW, Aartman IH, Wennink JM, ten Cate JM, de Soet JJ. The influence of dental caries on body growth in prepubertal children. Clin Oral Investig. 2010;
Amin MS, Harrison RL. Understanding parents' oral health behaviours for their young children. Qual Health Res. 2009; 19:116-127
Almeida AG, Roseman MM, Sheff M, Huntington N, Hughes CV. Future caries susceptibility in children with early childhood caries following treatment under general anesthesia. Pediatr Dent. 2000; 22:302-306
Clewett JA, Treasure ET. A retrospective study of dental general anaesthesia carried out in children living in North Wales 1995–1998. Community Dent Health. 2004; 21:212-216
Drummond BK, Davidson LE, Williams SM, Moffat SM, Ayers KM. Outcomes two, three and four years after comprehensive care under general anaesthesia. N Z Dent J. 2004; 100:32-37
Foster T, Perinpanayagam H, Pfaffenbach A, Certo M. Recurrence of early childhood caries after comprehensive treatment with general anesthesia and follow-up. J Dent Child. 2006; 73:25-30
Amin MS, Bedard D, Gamble J. Early childhood caries: recurrence after comprehensive dental treatment under general anaesthesia. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2010; 11:269-273
Hausen H. Caries prediction. In: Fejerskov O, Kidd E (eds). Oxford: Blackwell Munksgaard; 2008
Delivering Better Oral Health: An Evidence-Based Toolkit for Prevention. 2009;
Takahashi N, Nyvad B. Caries ecology revisited: microbial dynamics and the caries process. Caries Res. 2008; 42:409-418
Peretz B, Gluck G. Early childhood caries (ECC): a preventive-conservative treatment mode during a 12-month period. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2006; 30:191-194
Gruythuysen RJ. Non-restorative cavity treatment. Managing rather than masking caries activity. Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd. 2010; 117:173-180
Innes NPT, Stirrups DR, Evans DJ, Hall N, Leggate M. A novel technique using preformed metal crowns for managing carious primary molars in general practice – a retrospective analysis. Br Dent J. 2006; 200:451-454
van der Zee V, van Amerongen WE. Influence of preformed metal crowns (Hall Technique) on the occlusal vertical dimension in the primary dentition. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2010; 11:225-227
Innes N, Evans D, Hall N. The Hall technique for managing carious primary molars. Dent Update. 2009; 36:472-478
The Hall technique: a randomized controlled clinical trial of a novel method of managing carious primary molars in general dental practice: acceptability of the technique and outcomes at 23 months. 2007. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472–6831/7/18
Kidd EAM, Bjorndal L, Beighton D, Fejerskov O. Caries removal and the pulpo-dentinal complex. In: Fejerskov O, Kidd E (eds). Oxford: Blackwell Munksgaard; 2008
Grythuysen RJ, van Strijp AJ, Wu MK. Long-term survival of indirect pulp treatment in primary and permanent teeth with clinically diagnosed deep caries lesions. J Endod. 2010; 36:1490-1493
Lula ECO, Monteiro-Neto V, Alves CMC, Ribeiro CCC. Microbiological analysis after complete or partial caries removal of carious dentin in primary teeth: a randomized clinical trial. Caries Res. 2009; 43:354-358
Frenken JE, van Amerongen WE. The atraumatic restorative treatment approach. In: Fejerskov O, Kidd E (eds). Oxford: Blackwell Munksgaard; 2008
Boon CP, Visser NL, Kemoli AM, van Amerongen WE. ART class II restoration loss in primary molars: re-restoration or not?. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2010; 11:228-231
van Amerongen WE, Rahimtoola S. Is ART really atraumatic?. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1999; 27:431-435
Schriks MC, van Amerongen WE. Atraumatic perspectives of ART: psychological and physiological aspects of treatment with and without rotary instruments. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2003; 31:15-20
Fayle SA, Wellbury RR, Roberts JF. British Society of Paediatric Dentistry: a policy document on management of caries in the primary dentition. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2001; 11:153-157
Nugent ZJ, Pitts NB. Patterns of change and results overview 1985/6–1995/6 from the British Association for the Study of Community Dentistry (BASCD) co-ordinated National Health Services surveys of caries prevalence. Community Dent Health. 1997; 14:30-54
Dugall M. Carious primary teeth in children: can or should they be left unrestored?. Faculty Dent J. 2011; 2:8-13
Levine RS, Pitts NB, Nugent ZJ. The fate of 1587 unrestored carious teeth: a retrospective general dental practice based study from northern England. Br Dent J. 2002; 193:99-103
Levine RS, Nugent ZJ, Pitts NB. Pain prediction for preventive non-operative management of dentinal caries in primary teeth in general dental practice. Br Dent J. 2003; 195:202-206
Tickle M, Milsom KM, King D, Kearney-Mitchell P, Blinkhorn A. The fate of the carious primary teeth of children who regularly attend the general dental service. Br Dent J. 2002; 192:219-223
Milsom KM, Tickle M, Blinkhorn AS. Dental pain and dental treatment of young children attending the general dental service. Br Dent J. 2002; 192:280-284
Pine CM, Harris RV, Burnside G, Merrett MC. An investigation of the relationship between untreated decayed teeth and dental sepsis in 5-year-old children. Br Dent J. 2006; 200:45-47
Stephenson J, Chadwick BL, Playle RA, Treasure ET. A competing risk survival analysis model to assess the efficacy of filling carious primary teeth. Caries Res. 2010; 44:285-293
Curzon ME. Supervised neglect – again!. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2010; 11:51-52

Should deciduous teeth be restored? reflections of a cariologist

From Volume 39, Issue 3, April 2012 | Pages 159-166

Authors

Edwina Kidd

Professor of Cariology, Guy's, King's and St. Thomas' Schools of Medicine, Dentistry & Biomedical Sciences, Floor 25, Guy's Tower, Guy's Hospital, London Bridge, London SE1 9RT

Articles by Edwina Kidd

Abstract

Whether deciduous teeth should be restored has caused controversy for at least 150 years and the argument rages on. Dental caries is a controllable process. The role of operative dentistry and restorations, as far as caries control is concerned, is to make cavitated, uncleansible lesions accessible to plaque control. However, deciduous teeth are exfoliated and perhaps non-operative treatments (plaque control, fluoride, diet) are all that are required to take cavitated teeth pain-free to exfoliation. Are such techniques child-friendly, obviating the need for anaesthesia or the use of handpieces? Alternatively, are they wanton neglect? This paper is written by a cariologist who never treated children, to present alternative managements and rehearse these arguments from a cariological perspective.

Clinical Relevance: This paper might serve as a discussion document for a group of dentists deciding practice policy with regard to the management of caries in deciduous teeth.

Article

The caries process is a ubiquitous, natural process occurring in the biofilm. This community of micro-organisms is always metabolically active, causing minute fluctuations in pH. Where oral hygiene is poor, sugar intake frequent and/or saliva flow diminished, the consequence may be a net loss of mineral and the formation of a visible caries lesion on the tooth surface. The lesion should be regarded as the sign or symptom of the process. However, with regular disturbance of the biofilm with a fluoride-containing dentifrice and a sensible, but not draconian diet, lesions do not have to form in the first place and established lesions can be arrested at any stage of lesion development.1

However, in the absence of control, lesions cannot only form, but can progress until the tooth is destroyed and caries is the predominant cause of premature loss of deciduous teeth. Untreated severe dental caries in pre-school children may affect their body weight, growth and quality of life. It has been reported that, following caries treatment, body weight increased and quality of life improved,2 although the evidence is mixed. A recent study suggests that treatment of the caries may not, in fact, influence body growth.3 This study suggests that, while caries activity is a negative predictor for body growth in children, dental intervention does not lead to significant improvement of growth. There appear to be no studies suggesting that untreated, non-severe primary dentition decay cases (non-rampant caries) leads to significant effects on body weight or growth.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available