References

Rakhshan V. Congenitally missing teeth (hypodontia): a review of the literature concerning the etiology, prevalence, risk factors, patterns and treatment. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2015; 12:1-13
Gokkaya B, Oflezer O, Ozdil N Is there any relationship between hypodontia and hyperdontia with taurodontism, microdontia and macrodontia? A retrospective study. Niger J Clin Pract. 2020; 23:805-810
Jung RE, Zembic A, Pjetursson BE Systematic review of the survival rate and the incidence of biological, technical, and aesthetic complications of single crowns on implants reported in longitudinal studies with a mean follow-up of 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012; 23 Suppl 6:2-21 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02547.x
Oesterle LJ, Cronin RJ, Ranly DM. Maxillary implants and the growing patient. Int J oral Maxillofac Implant. 1993; 8:377-387
Scurria MS, Bader JD, Shugars DA. Meta-analysis of fixed partial denture survival: Prostheses and abutments. J Prosthet Dent. 1998; 79:459-64
Cheung GSP, Lai SCN, Ng RPY. Fate of vital pulps beneath a metal-ceramic crown or a bridge retainer. Int Endod J. 2005; 38:521-530
Pjetursson BE, Tan WC, Tan K A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of resin-bonded bridges after an observation period of at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008; 19:131-141
Aboush YE, Jenkins CB. The bonding of an adhesive resin cement to single and combined adherends encountered in resin-bonded bridge work: An in vitro study. Br Dent J. 1991; 171:166-169
Kimmich M, Stappert CFJ. Intraoral treatment of veneering porcelain chipping of fixed dental restorations: a review and clinical application. J Am Dent Assoc. 2013; 144:31-44
Panavia F2.0 Resin Cement. 2019. https://kuraraydental.com/product/panavia-f2-0/ (accessed August 2022)
Carrilho E, Cardoso M, Marques Ferreira M 10-MDP based dental adhesives: adhesive interface characterization and adhesive stability – a systematic review. Materials (Basel). 2019; 12 https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12050790
King PA, Foster L V., Yates RJ Survival characteristics of 771 resin-retained bridges provided at a UK dental teaching hospital. Br Dent J. 2015; 218:423-428
Ibrahim AA, Byrne D, Hussey DL, Claffey N. Bond strengths of maxillary anterior base metal resin-bonded retainers with different thicknesses. J Prosthet Dent. 1997; 78:281-285 https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3913(97)70027-1
Sato Y, Yuasa Y, Abe Y, Akagawn Y. Finite element and weibull analysis to estimate failure risk in resin-bonded retainers. Int J Prosthodont. 1995; 8:73-78

Resin-retained bridges: considerations to maximize enamel bonding and aesthetics for abutment teeth with compromised contour

From Volume 49, Issue 8, September 2022 | Pages 664-668

Authors

Joshua Hudson

BDS (Hons), MFDS FHEA RCPS(Glasg), BDS, MFDS, RCPS (Glasg), FHEA, PGCert

Specialty Doctor in Restorative Dentistry, RNENT and Eastman Dental Hospitals, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London

Articles by Joshua Hudson

Email Joshua Hudson

Krupti Denhard

BDS (Hons) MFDS RCS(Ed), MSc, FDS RCS(Eng)

Consultant in Restorative Dentistry, Eastman Dental Hospital, UCLH, London

Articles by Krupti Denhard

Abstract

The provision of resin-retained bridges (RRBs) on abutment teeth that require composite resin build-ups often proves challenging. This article presents a technique, represented through two clinical cases, that aims to reduce some of the issues associated with such scenarios. It describes the simultaneous cementation of the RRB while also undertaking composite resin additions. It showcases the advantages of such a technique – particularly in terms of maximizing enamel surface area available for bonding to the retainer, and thereby potentially improving the longevity of the prosthesis.

CPD/Clinical Relevance: Careful design and execution is required when providing resin-retained bridgework.

Article

Replacing missing anterior teeth can be particularly demanding where there is a spaced dentition, microdontia or unfavourable contour of potential abutment teeth. A common cause of missing teeth is hypodontia, with figures suggesting that between 0.15% and 16.2% of the population experience the congenital absence of at least one tooth, excluding third molars.1 Variations in reporting criteria and ethnicities may explain this, with Japanese people showing the highest rates and Indians, Black Africans and Aboriginal Australians showing some of the lowest.1

Multidisciplinary orthodontic and restorative management is often required for such cases to idealize the spaces and subsequently facilitate both functional and aesthetic restorative replacement. Orthodontic treatment may not always be able to move teeth into an ‘ideal’ restorative position, resulting in residual/compromised spacing, as demonstrated in Figure 1. Consequently, this requires addressing restoratively, alongside tooth replacement.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available