References

Manicone PF, Rossi Iommetti P, Raffaelli L. An overview of zirconia ceramics: basic properties and clinical applications. J Dent. 2007; 35:819-826
Garvie RC, Hanink RH, Pascoe RT. Ceramic Steel?. Nature. 1975; 258:703-704
Chevalier J. What future for zirconia as a biomaterial?. Biomaterials. 2006; 27:535-543
Piconi C, Maccauro G. Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial. Biomaterials. 1999; 20:1-25
Denry I, Kelly JR. State of the art of zirconia for dental applications. Dent Materials. 2008; 24:299-307
Deville S, Chevalier J, Gremillard L. Influence of surface finish and residual stresses on the ageing sensitivity of biomedical grade zirconia. Biomaterials. 2006; 27:2186-2192
Kosmac T, Oblak C, Jevnikar P, Funduk N, Marion L. The effect of surface grinding and sandblasting on flexural strength and reliability of Y-TZP zirconia ceramic. Dent Materials. 1999; 15:426-433
Lawson S. Environmental degradation of zirconia ceramics. J Eur Ceram Soc. 1995; 15:485-502
Scott HG. Phase relationships in the Zirconia-Yttria System. J Mat Sci. 1975; 10:1527-1535
Kosmac T, Oblak C, Jevnikar P, Funduk N, Marion L. Strength and reliability of surface treated Y-TZP dental ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res. 2000; 53:304-313
Sorenson J. All-ceramic restorations. Pers Comm. 2009;
Lughi V, Sergo V. Low temperature degradation – aging – of zirconia: a critical review of the relevant aspects in dentistry. Dent Materials. 2010; 26:807-820
Comlekoglu M, Dundar M, Ozcan M, Gungor M, Gokce B, Artunc C. Influence of cervical finish line type on the marginal adaptation of zirconia ceramic crowns. Oper Dent. 2009; 34:586-592
Warpeha J, Walter S, Goodkind RJ. Design and technique variables affecting fracture resistance of metal-ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 1976; 35:291-298
Kokubo Y, Tsumita M, Sakurai S, Torizuka K, Vult von Steyern P, Fukushima S. The effect of core framework designs on the fracture loads of all-ceramic fixed partial dentures on posterior implants. J Oral Rehabil. 2007; 34:503-507
Liu YH, Feng HL, Bao YW, Qiu Y. Analysis of the fracture processes in all-ceramic crowns by finite element analysis. Chinese J Stomatol. 2008; 43:561-563
Shirakura A, Lee H, Geminiani A, Ercoli C, Feng C. The influence of veneering porcelain thickness of all-ceramic and metal ceramic crowns on failure resistance after cyclic loading. J Prosthet Dent. 2009; 101:119-127
Proos KA, Swain MV, Ironside J, Steven GP. Influence of core thickness on a restored crown of a first premolar using finite element analysis. Int J Pros. 2003; 16:474-480
Studart AR, Filser F, Kocher P, Gauckler LJ. In vitro lifetime of dental ceramics under cyclic loading in water. Biomaterials. 2007; 28:2695-2705
Plengsombut K, Brewer JD, Monaco Jr EA, Davis EL. Effect of two connector designs on the fracture resistance of all-ceramic core materials for fixed dental prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 2009; 101:166-173
Larsson C, Holm L, Lovgren N, Kokubo Y, Vult von Steyern P. Fracture strength of four-unit Y-TZP FPD cores designed with varying connector diameter. An in-vitro study. J Oral Rehabil. 2007; 34:702-709
Zhang Y, Lawn BR. Fatigue sensitivity of Y-TZP to microscale sharp-contact flaws. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2005; 72:388-392
Zhang Y, Lawn BR, Rekow ED, Thompson VP. Effect of sandblasting on the long-term performance of dental ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2004; 71:381-386
Zhang Y, Pajares A, Lawn BR. Fatigue and damage tolerance of Y-TZP ceramics in layered biomechanical systems. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2004; 71:166-171
Heffernan MJ, Aquilino SA, Diaz-Arnold AM, Haselton DR, Stanford CM, Vargas MA. Relative translucency of six all-ceramic systems. Part I: Core materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2002; 88:4-9
Aboushelib MN, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Effect of zirconia type on its bond strength with different veneer ceramics. J Prosth. 2008; 17:401-408
Beuer F, Schweiger J, Eichberger M, Kappert HF, Gernet W, Edelhoff D. High-strength CAD/CAM-fabricated veneering material sintered to zirconia copings – a new fabrication mode for all-ceramic restorations. Dent Materials. 2009; 25:121-128
Aboushelib MN, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all-ceramic restorations. Part 3: double veneer technique. J Prosth. 2008; 17:9-13
Øilo M, Gjerdet NR, Tvinnereim HM. The firing procedure influences properties of a zirconia core ceramic. Dent Materials. 2008; 24:471-475
Aboushelib MN, de Jager N, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all-ceramic restorations. Dent Materials. 2005; 21:984-991
Taskonak B, Yan J, Mecholsky Jr JJ, Sertgöz A, Koçak A. Fractographic analyses of zirconia-based fixed partial dentures. Dent Materials. 2008; 24:1077-1082
Aboushelib MN, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all-ceramic restorations. Part II: Zirconia veneering ceramics. Dent Materials. 2006; 22:857-863
Hussain SKF, McDonald A, Moles DR. In vitro study investigating the mass of tooth structure removed following endodontic and restorative procedures. J Prosthet Dent. 2007; 98:260-269
Aboushelib MN, Matinlinna JP, Salameh Z, Ounsi H. Innovations in bonding to zirconia-based materials: Part I. Dent Materials. 2008; 24:1268-1272
Lindgren J, Smeds J, Sjögren G. Effect of surface treatments and aging in water on bond strength to zirconia. Oper Dent. 2008; 33:675-681
Atsu SS, Kilicarslan MA, Kucukesmen HC, Aka PS. Effect of zirconium-oxide ceramic surface treatments on the bond strength to adhesive resin. J Prosthet Dent. 2006; 95:430-436
de Souza GMD, Silva NRFA, Paulillo LAMS, De Goes MF, Rekow ED, Thompson VP. Bond strength to high-crystalline content zirconia after different surface treatments. J Biomed Mat Res Part B: Appl Biomat. 2010; 93B:318-323
3M ESPE. Handling and Prep Made Easy. LAVA Precision Solutions. 2006;
Duarte S, Phark J, Tada T, Sadan A. Resin-bonded fixed partial dentures with a new modified zirconia surface: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2009; 102:68-73
Jung RE, Pjetursson BE, Glauser R, Zembic A, Zwahlen M, Lang NP. A systematic review of the 5-year survival and complication rates of implant-supported single crowns. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008; 19:119-130
Kinsel RP, Lin D. Retrospective analysis of porcelain failures of metal ceramic crowns and fixed partial dentures supported by 729 implants in 152 patients: patient-specific and implant-specific predictors of ceramic failure. J Prosthet Dent. 2009; 101:388-394
Pjetursson BE, Bragger U, Lang NP, Zwahlen M. Comparison of survival and complication rates of tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and implant-supported FDPs and single crowns (SCs). Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007; 18:97-113
Pjetursson BE, Sailer I, Zwahlen M, Hammerle CH. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic reconstructions after an observation period of at least 3 years. Part I: Single crowns. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007; 18:73-85
Sailer I, Feher A, Filser F, Gauckler LJ, Luthy H, Hammerle CH. Five-year clinical results of zirconia frameworks for posterior fixed partial dentures. Int J Prosth. 2007; 20:383-388
Pjetursson BE, Tan WC, Tan K, Bragger U, Zwahlen M, Lang NP. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of resin-bonded bridges after an observation period of at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008; 19:131-141
Pjetursson BE, Lang NP. Prosthetic treatment planning on the basis of scientific evidence. J Oral Rehab. 2008; 35:72-79
Sailer I, Pjetursson BE, Zwahlen M, Hammerle CH. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic reconstructions after an observation period of at least 3 years. Part II: Fixed dental prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007; 18:86-96
Kreissl ME, Gerds T, Muche R, Heydecke G, Strub JR. Technical complications of implant-supported fixed partial dentures in partially edentulous cases after an average observation period of 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007; 18:720-726
Walton TR. An up to 15-year longitudinal study of 515 metal-ceramic FPDs: Part 1. Outcome. Int J Prosth. 2002; 15:439-445
Aglietta M, Siciliano VI, Zwahlen M, Bragger U, Pjetursson BE, Lang NP A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant supported fixed dental prostheses with cantilever extensions after an observation period of at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009; 20:441-451
Bragger U, Aeschlimann S, Burgin W, Hammerle CH, Lang NP. Biological and technical complications and failures with fixed partial dentures (FPD) on implants and teeth after four to five years of function. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001; 12:26-34
Ozcan M, Niedermeier W. Clinical study on the reasons for and location of failures of metal-ceramic restorations and survival of repairs. Int J Prosth. 2002; 15:299-302
Tsumita M, Kokubo Y, Vult von Steyern P, Fukushima S. Effect of framework shape on the fracture strength of implant-supported all-ceramic fixed partial dentures in the molar region. J Prosth. 2008; 17:274-285
Gottlow J, Dard M, Kjellson F, Obrecht M, Sennerby L. Evaluation of a new titanium-zirconium dental implant: a biomechanical and histological comparative study in the mini pig. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2010;

Laboratory aspects of zirconia restorations

From Volume 39, Issue 5, June 2012 | Pages 342-357

Authors

Christopher Millen

BDS, MFDS RCS(Ed)

Clinical Lecturer/Honorary Specialist Registrar in Restorative Dentistry

Articles by Christopher Millen

Krishnakant Bhatia

BDS, MFDS RCPS(Glas) MClinDent(Pros) MRD

Specialist in Prosthodontics, Edinburgh Dental Institute

Articles by Krishnakant Bhatia

Professor Richard Ibbetson

BDS, LDS RCS(Eng), MSc, FDS RCS(Eng), FDS RCS(Ed)

Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Centre for Adult Oral Health, The Dental Institute, London E1 4AT, UK

Articles by Professor Richard Ibbetson

Abstract

Zirconia restorations are now accepted and commonly prescribed in dentistry. However, these materials undergo hydrothermal ageing which can reduce their clinical performance. Appropriate handling is essential to limit the restorations’ susceptibility to low temperature degradation/ageing. Through appropriate clinical prescribing and laboratory manufacture, an aesthetic, strong and long-lasting restoration can be fabricated.

Clinical Relevance: This article will inform the reader about zirconia as a dental material as well as how best to handle a zirconia restoration.

Article

In ancient history zircon was known to be a gem. The name zirconium comes from Zargon which translates from Arabic to golden in colour. Zargon is a composite of two Persian words; Zar meaning gold and Gun meaning colour. Zirconium dioxide (ZrO2: zirconia) was first identified by a German chemist in 1789. The compound was used for a long time as part of a rare earth oxide mix to pigment ceramics. In its pure form, it is a white crystalline material and has three crystallographic forms, monoclinic, tetragonal and cubic. Monoclinic is the most naturally occurring form, while ‘cubic zirconia’ is rarely found in nature and is best known as a diamond simulant owing to a structural chemistry similar to cubic carbon and a high index of refraction. This is referred to as zircon by jewellers; however zircon is actually the mineral name for naturally occurring zirconium silicate.

Zirconia ceramic was first introduced to the medical profession in 1969 in the field of orthopaedics as a proposed material for hip replacements.1 Since then it has been described as ‘ceramic steel’2 and is widely used in both dentistry and medicine.3 Owing to its impressive flexural and compressive strengths of 900–1200 MPa and 2000 MPa, respectively,4 zirconia has developed into an efficient core material for all-ceramic restorations.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available