References

Loomans B. European statement of consensus regarding the treatment of severe tooth wear. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Tandheelkunde. 2018; 125:223-231
Van't Spijker A, Rodriguez J, Kreulen C, Bronkhorst E, Bartlett D, Creugers N. Prevalence of tooth wear in adults. Int J Prosthodont. 2009; 22:35-42
Office for National Statistics. Living longer – how our population is changing and why it matters. 2020. https://tinyurl.com/2p984dsa (accessed January 2022)
Shellis R, Addy M. The interactions between attrition, abrasion and erosion in tooth wear. Monogr Oral Sci. 2014; 25:32-45
Lussi A, Carvalho T. Erosive tooth wear: a multifactorial condition of growing concern and increasing knowledge. Monogr Oral Sci. 2014; 25:1-15
The glossary of prosthodontic terms. J Prosthet Dent. 2017; 117:e1-e105
Falcon H, Richardson P, Shaw M Developing an index of restorative dental treatment need. Br Dent J. 2001; 190:479-486
Malkoc M, Sevimay M, Yaprak E. The use of zirconium and feldspathic porcelain in the management of the severely worn dentition: a case report. Euro J Dent. 2009; 3:75-78
Robinson S, Nixon P, Gahan M, Chan M. Techniques for restoring worn anterior teeth with direct composite resin. Dent Update. 2008; 35:551-558
Mehta S, Banerji S, Millar B, Suarez-Feito J. Current concepts on the management of tooth wear: part 4. An overview of the restorative techniques and dental materials commonly applied for the management of tooth wear. Br Dent J. 2012; 212:169-177
Ahmed K, Murbay S. Survival rates of anterior composites in managing tooth wear: systematic review. J Oral Rehab. 2015; 43:145-153
Milosevic A, Burnside G. The survival of direct composite restorations in the management of severe tooth wear including attrition and erosion: a prospective 8-year study. J Dent. 2016; 44:13-19
Magne P, Schlichting L, Maia H, Baratieri L. In vitro fatigue resistance of CAD/CAM composite resin and ceramic posterior occlusal veneers. J Prosthet Dent. 2010; 104:149-157
Gulamali A, Hemmings K, Tredwin C, Petrie A. Survival analysis of composite Dahl restorations provided to manage localised anterior tooth wear (ten year follow-up). Br Dent J. 2011; 211
Al-Khayatt A, Ray-Chaudhuri A, Poyser N Direct composite restorations for the worn mandibular anterior dentition: a 7-year follow-up of a prospective randomised controlled split-mouth clinical trial. J Oral Rehab. 2013; 40:389-401
Maroulakos G, Nagy W, Stathopoulou P Restoration of the worn dentition: basic prosthodontic principles and current rehabilitation techniques. Curr Oral Health Rep. 2017; 4:124-130
Vailati F, Belser U. Full-mouth adhesive rehabilitation of a severely eroded dentition: the three-step technique. Part 3. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2008; 3:236-257
Vailati F, Belser U. Full mouth adhesive rehabilitation of a severely eroded dentition: the three step technique. Part 1. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2008; 3:30-44
Loomans B, Opdam N. A guide to managing tooth wear: the Radboud philosophy. Br Dent J. 2018; 224:348-356
Smales R, Etemadi S. Survival of ceramic onlays placed with and without metal reinforcement. J Prosthet Dent. 2004; 91:548-553
Van Dijken J, Hasselrot L. A prospective 15-year evaluation of extensive dentin–enamel-bonded pressed ceramic coverages. Dent Mater. 2010; 26:929-939
Lu T, Peng L, Xiong F A 3-year clinical evaluation of endodontically treated posterior teeth restored with two different materials using the CEREC AC chair-side system. J Prosthet Dent. 2018; 119:363-368
Kaytan B, Onal B, Pamir T, Tezel H. Clinical evaluation of indirect resin composite and ceramic onlays over a 24 month period. Gen Dent. 2005; 53:329-34
Mehta S, Banerji S, Millar B, Suarez-Feito J. Current concepts on the management of tooth wear: part 1. Assessment, treatment planning and strategies for the prevention and the passive management of tooth wear. Br Dent J. 2012; 212:17-27
Hemmings K, Truman A, Shah S, Chauhan R. Tooth wear guidelines for the BSRD part 2: fixed management of tooth wear. Dent Update. 2018; 45:590-600
Maroulakos G, Nagy W, Stathopoulou P Restoration of the worn dentition: basic prosthodontic principles and current rehabilitation techniques. Curr Oral Health Rep. 2017; 4:124-130
El Wazani B, Dodd MN, Milosevic A. The signs and symptoms of tooth wear in a referred group of patients. Br Dent J. 2012; 213

Direct versus indirect restorations in the treatment of tooth wear: a report of two cases

From Volume 49, Issue 2, February 2022 | Pages 133-138

Authors

Farima Mehrabi

BDS, MFDS, RCSEd PgCertMedEd

Dental Foundation Trainee

Articles by Farima Mehrabi

Shihab Romeed

Consultant in Restorative Dentistry, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Cosham, Portsmouth; Director of London Dental Academy

Articles by Shihab Romeed

Abstract

The process of tooth wear is multifactorial in aetiology, and when the progression has been considered excessive enough to be associated with aesthetic and functional concerns, appropriate assessment of each case and its treatment selection must be made, using evidence-based practice to treat such patients. Composite and ceramics are dental materials that have long been used for the restoration of patients with tooth wear. This article will explore the comparisons and rationale between direct and indirect methods and materials, using two rehabilitation cases as examples to show the impact of management of such patients. Although some cases may require a removable treatment option, this article will focus on non-removable options only.

CPD/Clinical Relevance: This article provides readers with an understanding of the selection criteria and utility values when deciding whether to restore a patient's dentition with indirect or direct materials.

Article

Tooth wear has increasingly posed challenges within the realms of primary care dentistry. Pathological tooth wear is defined as one ‘which is atypical for the age of the patient, causing pain or discomfort, functional problems, or deterioration of aesthetic appearance, which, if it progresses, may give rise to undesirable complications of increasing complexity’.1 The results of Van't Spijker's review indicate that the predicted percentage of adults presenting with severe tooth wear increased significantly from 3% at the age of 20 years to 17% at the age of 70 years.2 Increasing levels of tooth wear are directly associated with age, and as the percentage rise in the number of elderly people is estimated to increase by 16.4% by 2030,3 there will inevitably be an upsurge of such cases within the primary dental care sector.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available