References

Hargreaves AS. Nylon as a denture base material. Dent Pract Dent Rec. 1971; 22:122-128
Matthews E, Smith DC. Nylon as a denture base material. Br Dent J. 1955; 98:231-237
Watt DM. Clinical assessment of nylon as a partial denture base material. Br Dent J. 1955; 98:238-244
Munns D. Nylon as a denture base material. Dent Pract Dent Rec. 1962; 13:142-146
Parvizi A, Lindquist T, Schneider R, Williamson D, Boyer D, Dawson D. Comparison of the dimensional accuracy of injection-molded denture base materials to that of conventional pressure-pack acrylic resin. J Prosthodont. 2004; 13:83-89
Kaplan P. Flexible removable partial dentures: design and clasp concepts. Dent Today. 2008; 27:120-123
MacGregor AR, Miller TPG, Farah JW. Stress analysis of mandibular partial dentures with bounded free-end saddles. J Dent. 1980; 8:27-34
Orr S, Linden GJ, Newman NH. The effect of partial denture connectors on gingival health. J Clin Periodontol. 1992; 19:589-594
Crissey JT. Stomatitis, dermatitis and denture materials. Arch Derm. 1965; 92:45-48
Tsuchiya H, Hoshino Y, Tajima K, Takagi N. Leaching and cytotoxicity of formaldehyde and methylmethacrylate, from acrylic resin denture base materials. J Prosthet Dent. 1994; 71:618-624
Masuki K, Nomura Y, Bhawal UK, Sawajiri M, Hirata I, Nahara Y, Okazaki M. Apoptic and necrotic influence of dental resin polymerization initiators in human gingival fibroblast cultures. Dent Mat J. 2007; 26:861-869
Hashimoto Y, Kawaguchi M, Miyazaki K, Nakamura M. Estrogenic activity of tissue conditioners in vitro. Dent Mat. 2003; 19:341-346
Gawkrodger D J. Investigation of reactions to dental materials. Br J Dermatol. 2005; 153:479-485
Gebhardt M, Geier J. Evaluation of patch test results with denture material series. Contact Derm. 1996; 34:191-195
Fisher AA. Allergic sensitisation of the skin and oral mucosa to acrylic denture materials. J Am Med Assoc. 1954; 156:238-242
Pfeiffer P, Rosenbauer EU. Residual methyl methacrylate monomer, water sorption, and water solubility of hypoallergenic denture base materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2004; 92:72-78
Pfeiffer P, Rolleke C, Sherif L. Flexural strength and moduli of hypoallergenic denture base materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2005; 93:372-377
Mante FK, Mante MO, Petropolous VC. In-vitro hardness of sealed resilient lining materials on immersion in various fluids. J Prosthodont. 2008; 17:384-391
Kiat-Amnuay S, Gettleman L, Mekayarajjananonth T The influence of water storage on durometer hardness of 5 soft denture liners over time. J Prosthodont. 2005; 14:19-24
Wright PS. The success and failure of denture soft-lining materials in clinical use. J Dent. 1984; 12:319-327
Polyzois GL. Adhesion properties of resilient lining materials bonded to light-cured denture. J Prosthet Dent. 1992; 68:854-858
Handa RK, Jagger DC, Vowles RW. Denture cleansers, soft lining materials and water temperature: what is the effect?. Primary Dent Care. 2008; 15:(2)53-58
Chander S, Hill M, Moore D, Morrow L. Tissue conditioning materials as functional impression materials. Eur J Prosthodont Res Dent. 2007; 15:67-71
de Souza RF, de Freitas Oliveira Paranhos H, Lovato da Silva CH Interventions for cleaning dentures in adults. Cochrane Database Systematic Rev. 2009; (4) https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007395.pub2
Ferracane JL. Hygroscopic and hydrolytic effects in dental polymer networks. Dent Mat. 2006; 22:211-222
Webb BC, Thomas CJ, Harty DW, Willcox MD. Effectiveness of two methods of denture sterilization. J Oral Rehab. 1998; 25:416-423
Chandra J, Mukherjee PK Antifungal resistance of candidal biofilms formed on denture acrylic in vitro. J Dent Res. 2001; 80:903-908
Verran J, Maryan CJ. Retention of Candida albicans on acrylic resin and silicone of different surface topography. J Prosthet Dent. 1997; 77:535-539
Chow CK, Matear DW, Lawrence HP. Efficacy of antifungal agents in tissue conditioners in treating candidiasis. Gerodontology. 1999; 16:110-118
Pavan S, Filho JNA, Dos Santos PH, Nogueira SS, Batista AUD. Effect of disinfection treatments on the hardness of soft denture liner materials. J Prosthodont. 2007; 16:101-106
Kuhar M, Funduk N. Effects of polishing techniques on the surface roughness of acrylic denture base resins. J Prosthet Dent. 2005; 93:76-85
Monsenego P. Presence of microorganisms on the fitting complete denture surface: study in vivo. J Oral Rehab. 2000; 27:708-713
O'Donnell EF, Radford DR Chairside polishing of heat-cured acrylic resin: an SEM and EDA study. Int J Prosthodont. 2003; 16:233-238

Contemporary denture base resins: part 2

From Volume 39, Issue 3, April 2012 | Pages 176-187

Authors

L J Rickman

BDS, MSc, MFDS RCS

General Dental Practitioner, Antley Villa Dental Practice, 432 Blackburn Road, Accrington, Lancashire

Articles by L J Rickman

P Padipatvuthikul

DDS, MBA, MDentSci, PhD

Lecturer in Restorative Dentistry, Srinakharinwirot University, Faculty of Dentistry, 114 Sukhumvit 23, Bangkok 10110, Thailand

Articles by P Padipatvuthikul

J D Satterthwaite

BDS, MSc, PhD, FDS, MFDS RCS, FDS(Rest Dent)

Lecturer in Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, The University of Manchester, Higher Cambridge Street, Manchester M15 6FH, UK

Articles by J D Satterthwaite

Abstract

Provision of partial and complete dentures constructed from resin is commonplace and a satisfactory outcome requires the consideration of the properties of the resin, the oral tissues and prosthodontic principles. This second of a two-part series examines the advantages and disadvantages of flexible nylon denture base resins, which have found popularity for the provision of partial dentures. Adverse effects of denture base resins are examined and the benefits and shortcomings of softliners are explored. Chairside adjustment and polishing, and denture hygiene are also discussed.

Clinical Relevance: Knowledge of contemporary denture base resin systems will help to achieve optimal outcomes in removable prosthodontics.

Article

Increasingly, dental patients are retaining their teeth, owing in large part to improved oral health awareness. Those patients who are unfortunate enough to lose teeth often enquire about the possibility of replacing missing teeth with fixed prostheses which, as a result of implant therapy, is increasingly possible. However, there remains a demand for ‘simple’ removable dentures by a significant proportion of patients who are completely or partially edentulous. These are most commonly made either entirely of acrylic, or may consist of acrylic saddles on a cobalt chromium framework, in the case of partial dentures. Acrylic has a good track record and fulfils many of the ideal properties of a denture base material but its use is a compromise. A number of its benefits and shortcomings were discussed in part one of this series and others, such as soft-lining acrylics and the potential of acrylics to cause adverse effects, are examined in this second section. However, we begin by exploring the use of flexible nylon denture base resins as an alternative to hard acrylic.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available