References

Pilalas I, Tsalikis L, Tatakis DN. Pre-restorative crown lengthening surgery outcomes: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2016; 43:1094-1108
Alfallaj H. Pre-prosthetic orthodontics. Saudi Dent J. 2020; 32:7-14
Dietschi D, Spreafico R. Current clinical concepts for adhesive cementation of tooth-colored posterior restorations. Prac Periodont Aesthet Dent. 1998; 10:47-54
Magne P, Spreafico R. Deep margin elevation: a paradigm shift. Am J Esthet Dent. 2012; 2:86-96
Frese C, Wolff D, Staehle HJ. Proximal box elevation with resin composite and the dogma of biological width: clinical R2-technique and critical review. Oper Dent. 2014; 39:22-31
Veneziani M. Adhesive restorations in the posterior area with subgingival cervical margins: new classification and differentiated treatment approach. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2010; 5:50-76
Magne P. Immediate dentin sealing: a fundamental procedure for indirect bonded restorations. J Esthet Restorat Dent. 2005; 17:144-154
Spreafico R, Marchesi G, Turco G Evaluation of the in vitro effects of cervical marginal relocation using composite resins on the marginal quality of CAD/CAM crowns. J Adhes Dent. 2016; 18:355-362
Müller V, Friedl KH, Friedl K Influence of proximal box elevation technique on marginal integrity of adhesively luted Cerec inlays. Clin Oral Invest. 2017; 21:607-612
Frankenberger R, Hehn J, Hajtó J Effect of proximal box elevation with resin composite on marginal quality of ceramic inlays in vitro. Clin Oral Invest. 2013; 17:177-183
Roggendorf MJ, Krämer N, Dippold C Effect of proximal box elevation with resin composite on marginal quality of resin composite inlays in vitro. J Dent. 2012; 40:1068-1073
Zaruba M, Göhring TN, Wegehaupt FJ, Attin T. Influence of a proximal margin elevation technique on marginal adaptation of ceramic inlays. Acta Odontol Scand. 2013; 71:317-324
Köken S, Juloski J, Sorrentino R Marginal sealing of relocated cervical margins of mesio-occluso-distal overlays. J Oral Sci. 2018; 60:460-468
Ilgenstein I, Zitzmann NU, Bühler J Influence of proximal box elevation on the marginal quality and fracture behavior of root-filled molars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic or composite onlays. Clin Oral Invest. 2015; 19:1021-1028
Grubbs TD, Vargas M, Kolker J, Teixeira EC. Efficacy of direct restorative materials in proximal box elevation on the margin quality and fracture resistance of molars restored with CAD/CAM onlays. Oper Dent. 2020; 45:52-61
Gonçalves DD, Cura M, Ceballos L, Fuentes MV. Influence of proximal box elevation on bond strength of composite inlays. Clin Oral Invest. 2017; 21:247-254
Kielbassa AM, Philipp F. Restoring proximal cavities of molars using the proximal box elevation technique: systematic review and report of a case. Quintessence Int. 2015; 46:751-764
Juloski J, Köken S, Ferrari M. Cervical margin relocation in indirect adhesive restorations: a literature review. J Prosthodont Res. 2018; 62:273-280
Sarfati A, Tirlet G. Deep margin elevation versus crown lengthening: biologic width revisited. Int J Esthet Dent. 2018; 13:334-356
Ferrari M, Koken S, Grandini S Influence of cervical margin relocation (CMR) on periodontal health: 12-month results of a controlled trial. J Dent. 2018; 69:70-76
Bertoldi C, Monari E, Cortellini P Clinical and histological reaction of periodontal tissues to subgingival resin composite restorations. Clin Oral Invest. 2020; 24:1001-1011
Bresser RA, Gerdolle D, van den Heijkant IA Up to 12 years clinical evaluation of 197 partial indirect restorations with deep margin elevation in the posterior region. J Dent. 2019; 91
Ghezzi C, Brambilla G, Conti A Cervical margin relocation: case series and new classification system. Int J Esthet Dent. 2019; 14:272-284
Rocca GT, Rizcalla N, Krejci I, Dietschi D. Evidence-based concepts and procedures for bonded inlays and onlays. Part II. Guidelines for cavity preparation and restoration fabrication. Int J Esthet Dent. 2015; 10:392-413
Dietschi D, Spreafico R. Evidence-based concepts and procedures for bonded inlays and onlays. Part I. Historical perspectives and clinical rationale for a biosubstitutive approach. Int J Esthet Dent. 2015; 10:210-207

Cervical margin relocation and indirect restorations: Case report and literature review

From Volume 48, Issue 2, February 2021 | Pages 93-97

Authors

Aftab Butt

BDS(Hons), MFDS, RCPS (Glasg)

DCT Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Luton and Dunstable Hospital, Bedfordshire, UK

Articles by Aftab Butt

Email Aftab Butt

Abstract

Coronal margin relocation (CMR) is a technique that is being increasingly used to manage subgingival defects in cavities in posterior teeth. The aim of this case report and literature review is to arm the dental practitioner with up-to-date scientific literature on this topic, such that they can appropriately incorporate CMR into their practice. Inclusion criteria for the literature review were the use of composite as the material used for CMR and a subsequent indirect restoration. Medline was searched and manual search of bibliographies was carried out. This yielded nine in vitro studies and 12 clinical reports that were considered in this review.

CPD/Clinical Relevance: The CMR technique is being used more widely in dental practice and it is important for dental practitioners to be aware of the evidence base on which to guide their practice.

Article

The management of subgingivally extending carious lesions in posterior teeth poses a common clinical scenario faced in dental practice. Traditionally, surgical and orthodontic crown lengthening has been used to increase crown height in such situations, although it may be considered that additional training would be needed for such techniques.1,2 The evolution of dental adhesive systems and restorative materials however, has led to the increased use of an alternative technique that first appeared in the literature in 1998: cervical margin relocation (CMR).3 It has since also been referred to as ‘deep margin elevation’ (DME) and ‘proximal box elevation’ (PBE), among other names. The technique advocates the direct addition of composite resin onto the cavity floors of posterior proximal subgingival defects to produce a supragingivally displaced margin,4 which can then be used as the margin for a further indirect or, less commonly, direct restoration.4,5 The rationale for this technique includes the improved ease of impression taking and isolation of the relocated margin, while being less invasive and more affordable than surgical crown lengthening options.4

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available