References

Preamble to the Constitution of the World Health Organization as adopted by the International Health Conference. Official Records of the World Health Organization. 1948; 19456:(2)
Knutson JW, Klein H, Palmer CE. Dental needs of grade-school children in Hagerstown, MD. J Am Dent Assoc. 1940; 41:579-588
Locker D. Measuring oral health: a conceptual framework. Community Dent Health. 1988; 5:3-18
Locker D, Miller Y. Evaluation of subjective oral health status indicators. J Public Health Dent. 1994; 54:167-176
Regulations 1990.P3 London: HMSO;
Yewe-Dyer MR. The definition of oral health. Br Dent J. 1993; 174:224-225
Oral Health Strategy Group. An oral health strategy for England. 1994. https://tinyurl.com/yxm3dqqe (accessed October 2020)
Glick M, Williams DM, Kleinman DV A new definition for oral health developed by the FDI World Dental Federation opens the door to a universal definition of oral health. J Am Dent Assoc. 2016; 147:915-917
Glick M, Williams DM, Kleinman DV A new definition for oral health developed by the FDI World Dental Federation opens the door to a universal definition of oral health. Br Dent J. 2016; 221:792-793
Lamster IB. Defining oral health: a new comprehensive definition. Int Dent J. 2016; 66:321-323
Burke FJT, Wilson NHF. Measuring oral health: an historical view and details of a contemporary oral health index (OHX). Int Dent J. 1995; 45:358-370
Cvar JF, Ryge G. Reprint of criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials. 1971. Clin Oral Investig. 2005; 9:215-232
Hickel R, Roulet JF, Bayne S Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials. Science Committee Project 2/98 – FDI World Dental Federation study design (Part I) and criteria for evaluation (Part II) of direct and indirect restorations including onlays and partial crowns. J Adhes Dent. 2007; 9:121-147
Marquillier T, Doméjean S, Le Clerc J The use of FDI criteria in clinical trials on direct dental restorations: a scoping review. J Dent. 2018; 68:1-9
Ainamo J, Barnes D, Beagrie G Development of the World Health Organization (WHO) Community Periodontal Index of Treatment Needs (CPITN). Int Dent J. 1982; 32:281-291
Caton JG, Armitage G, Berglundh T A new classification scheme for periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions. Introduction and key changes from the 1999 classification. J Clin Periodontol. 2018; 45:S1-S8
Dietrich T, Ower P, Tank M Periodontal diagnosis in the context of the 2017 classification system of periodontal diseases and conditions: implementation in clinical practice. Br Dent J. 2019; 226:16-22
Milward MR, Roberts A. Assessing periodontal health and the British Society of Periodontology implementation of the new classification of periodontal diseases 2017. Dent Update. 2019; 46:918-929
Pitts NB, Stamm J. International Consensus Workshop on Caries Clinical Trials (ICW-CCT) final consensus statements: agreeing where the evidence leads. J Dent. 2004; 83:125-128
Pitts NB. ICDAS: an international system for caries detection and assessment being developed to facilitate caries epidemiology, research and appropriate clinical management. Community Dent Health. 2004; 21:193-198
Shivakumar KM, Prasad S, Chandu GN. International caries detection and assessment system: a new paradigm in detection of dental caries. J Conserv Dent. 2009; 12:10-16
Smith BGN, Knight JK. An index for measuring the wear of teeth. Br Dent J. 1984; 156:435-439
Bartlett D. A proposed system for screening tooth wear. Br Dent J. 2010; 208:204-209
O'Toole S, Mylonas P, Bartlett DW. Practice-based risk assessment – a practical guide for oral healthcare teams: Tooth wear. Dent Update. 2019; 46:171-178
Holt VP. Patient satisfaction questionnaires – how to do them successfully. Dent Update. 2006; 33:338-346
McDowell I, Newell C. Measuring health. A guide to rating scales and questionnaires.Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1996
The evaluation of Canadian dental health. A system for recording and statistical analysis at the community, provincial and national level.Toronton: Canadian Dental Association; 1959
Lambert C, Freeman E. The Clinic Habit.Newhaven, CT, USA: College and University Press; 1967
Bulman JS, Richards ND, Slack GL, Willcocks AJ. Demand and need for dental care: a sociodental study.London: Oxford University Press; 1968
Carr W, Wolfe S. Unmet need for dental services. Working paper.: Centre for Health Care Research Meharry Medical College; 1975
Nikias MK, Sollecito WA, Fink R. An oral health index based on ranking of oral status profiles by panels of dental professionals. J Public Health Dent. 1979; 39;:16-26
Marcus M, Koch AL, Gershen J.A. An empirically derived measure of oral health status for adult populations. J Public Health Dent. 1980; 40:334-343
Marcus M, Koch AL, Gershen JA. A proposed index of oral health status: a practical application. J Am Dent Assoc. 1983; 107:729-733
Ireland RS, Jenner AM, Williams MJ, Tickle M. A clinical minimum data set for primary dental care. Br Dent J. 2001; 190:663-667
Mann J, Sgan-Cohen HD, Asher RS Treatment need index: a pilot study. Int Dent J. 1993; 43:129-134
Hede B. Oral health in Danish hospitalized psychiatric patients. Comm Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1995; 23:44-8
Witter DJ, Cramwinckel AB, van Rossum GMJM, Kayser AF. Shortened dental arches and masticatory efficiency. J Dent. 1990; 18:185-189
Burke FJT, Greene PR, Roberts C. Reproducibility studies on a newly designed Index of oral health. J Dent Res. 1994; 73
Burke FJT, Busby M, McHugh S Evaluation of an oral health scoring system by dentists in general dental practice. Br Dent J. 2003; 194:213-218
Burke FJT, Busby M, McHugh S A pilot study of patients' views of an oral health scoring system. Primary Dent Care. 2004; 11:37-39
Busby M, Burke FJT, Matthews R Measuring oral health as part of a concise patient survey. Br Dent J. 2012; 213:1-5
Denplan Excel Training Manual.Winchester: Denplan;
Rooney E. Risk driven care pathways in publicly funded care. In: Chapple ILC, Papapanou PN (eds). : Springer; 2020
Scottish Dental Clinical Effectiveness Programme (SDCEP). Oral health assessment and review: guidance in brief. 2011. https://tinyurl.com/y2wr273v (accessed Ocober 2020)
Public Health Wales. Assessment of Clinical Oral Risks and Needs for routine patients (ACORN). http://www.primarycareone.wales.nhs.uk/acorn-and-expectations (accessed October 2020)
Chapple L, Yonel Z. Oral health risk assessment. Dent Update. 2018; 45:841-847
An independent review of NHS Dental Services in England. 2009. https://tinyurl.com/yxhdtuzt (accessed October 2020)
Newton JT, Asimakopoulou K. The perceived acceptability of the DEPPA patient assessment tool: a questionnaire survey of Denplan Excel patients. Br Dent J. 2017; 222:767-770
Asimakopoulou K, Newton JT, Daly B The effects of providing periodontal disease risk information on psychological outcomes: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2015; 42:350-355
Asimakopoulou KG, Nolan M, McCarthy CCL, Newton JT. The effect of risk communication on periodontal treatment outcomes; a randomized controlled trial. J Periodontol. 2019; 90:948-956
Lucarotti PSK, Burke FJT. Patient history as a predictor of future treatment need? Considerations from a dataset containing over nine million courses of treatment. Br Dent J. 2020; 228:345-350
Peres MA, Macpherson LMD, Weyant RJ, Daly B Oral disease: a global health challenge. Lancet. 2019; 394:249-260

Measuring Oral Health: From Simple Scoring to a Combined Risk-assessment Approach

From Volume 47, Issue 10, November 2020 | Pages 855-865

Authors

FJ Trevor Burke

DDS, MSc, MDS, MGDS, FDS (RCS Edin), FDS RCS (Eng), FCG Dent, FADM,

Articles by FJ Trevor Burke

Liz Chapple

BA(Hons), ACA

Director, Oral Health Innovations Ltd (UK supplier of PreViser™ and DEPPA technology)

Articles by Liz Chapple

M Busby

BDS, LDS (RCS Eng.) DGDP, MPhil, FDS RCS (Edin)

Previously Hon Lecturer in Primary Dental Care, University of Birmingham School of Dentistry

Articles by M Busby

Abstract

The ability to measure oral health is central to successful, patient-oriented clinical practice. In this regard, there have been a variety of definitions of oral health over the years, with the most recent being one by the FDI. Specific quality measures have been designed to assess, for example, the technical excellence of restorations, periodontal health, tooth wear, and, depth of caries (e.g. ICDAS). However, a single index that would produce a composite score of oral health could be considered desirable and the ideal criteria for this are discussed, namely, that it should be reproducible and valid, readily understood and capable of being used by dentists with minimal instruction and training. The profession has now entered the era of personalised medicine where risk factors need to be identified and patients educated about these, thus empowering them to work with their care provider and at home to take responsibility for their own dental health. As a result, a variety of oral health assessments, which include assessments of risk factors, have now become available: examples of these are described, with suggestions regarding the implementation of such into a clinician's practice being given.

CPD/Clinical Relevance: The ability to measure oral health is central to successful clinical practice.

Article

The World Health Organization1 describes health in holistic terms as ‘a state of complete physical, mental and social wellbeing and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity’. This definition is broader than our traditional definitions of health, including patient-centred outcomes, which, in dentistry, we capture using quality-of-life measures and patient-reported outcomes. However, historically, dental health, and more recently, oral health has been measured in a number of ways. A common method of describing dental health was the DMFT or DMFS index (decayed missing and filled teeth or surfaces).2 However, this measure has been considered to have limitations (Table 1).

Many such measures of oral conditions do not assess their impact on a patient's quality of life, and, increasingly the drive is to record socio-dental indicators, defined by Locker as ‘measures of the extent to which dental and oral disorders disrupt normal role functioning’ should be applied.3 A study by Locker and Miller examined eight subjective oral health status indicators: the ability to chew and speak; oral pain and symptoms; ease of eating and communication; impact on daily life and worry/concern about appearance or health of teeth or mouth.4 The results indicated that it may be possible to identify populations in need of treatment and prevention using subjective indicators alone. However, it is the view of the principal author that examination of a patient (and speaking with them) is essential to measure their oral health. This is particularly pertinent in the COVID-19 era, where the role of remote consultations has a place, but may not facilitate the formulation of a diagnosis.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available