References

Naini FB. Facial Aesthetics: Concepts and Clinical Diagnosis.Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2011
Alberti LB. De Re Aedificatoria (On Architecture).Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1988
Santayana G. The Sense of Beauty.Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press; 1896
Facial attractiveness: evolutionary, cognitive, and social perspectives. In: Rhodes G, Zebrowitz LA (eds). London: Ablex; 2002
Huxley TH. Evolution and ethics (1893).Whitefish, MT: Kessinger Publishing Co; 1894
The Hippias Major.Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press; 1928
Lives of the Philosophers.London: Gateway Publishing; 1969
Neziroglu F, Barile N. Environmental factors in body dysmorphic disorder. In: Phillips KA (ed). New York: Oxford University Press; 2017
Phillips KA, Crerand CE. Psychological evaluation and body dysmorphic disorder. In: Naini FB, Gill DS (eds). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2017
Naini FB. A surgeon's perspective on body dysmorphic disorder and recommendations for surgeons and mental health clinicians. In: Phillips KA (ed). New York: Oxford University Press; 2017
Burke FJ, Kelleher MG. The “daughter test” in elective esthetic dentistry. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2009; 21:143-146
Kelleher M. Ethical issues, dilemmas and controversies in ‘cosmetic’ or aesthetic dentistry. A personal opinion. Br Dent J. 2012; 212:365-367
Kelleher MG. The ‘Daughter Test’ in Aesthetic (‘Esthetic’) or Cosmetic Dentistry. Dent Update. 2010; 37:5-11
Godwin W. Memoirs of the Author of a Vindication of the Rights of Woman.Whithorn: Anodos Books; 1798

Defining beauty: the Hippias major and contemporary musings

From Volume 46, Issue 7, July 2019 | Pages 607-609

Authors

Farhad B Naini

Consultant Orthodontist, St George's and Kingston Hospitals, London, UK

Articles by Farhad B Naini

Article

Hindsight can be a great teacher. The purpose of this editorial is to outline briefly a 2500-year-old debate about the importance of providing, or at least searching for, accurate definitions, particularly about the nature of beauty, and how the debate is relevant to modern dentistry owing to its emphasis on dentofacial aesthetics, followed by a brief discussion regarding the potential relevance of this debate to modern dentistry, including some comments on the ethics of current practice.

A philosophical way of thinking involves questioning everything, including any values which may be ingrained in us and appear ‘normal’, primarily due to general societal acceptance. History demonstrates how many such deeply-held or traditional standards change over time as humanity progresses towards greater ethical values. The link with modern dentistry is discussed.

Many specialties of dentistry and medicine are concerned with external dentofacial and bodily appearance, which are often inextricably linked to internal psychosocial health and quality of life. Congenital, developmental, traumatic and pathological conditions may all affect a patient's dentofacial appearance. A key issue for clinicians is that an individual's appearance, and visible differences from the average, are all connected, potentially through evolutionary processes moulded by cultural forces and standards, to our understanding of beauty.1 It thereby follows that understanding the concept of beauty begins by attempting to define it.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available