References

Effect of Atraumatic Intrusion of Implant into the Maxillary Sinus. Egypt J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011; 2:8-16

Is the maxillary sinus really such a problem in implant therapy?

From Volume 39, Issue 4, May 2012 | Page 296

Authors

Peter Carrotte

Glasgow

Articles by Peter Carrotte

Article

Although this paper appears at first to be only of interest to practitioners actively involved in the prescription and placement of dental implants, it is important that the procedures and results presented are understood by all clinicians as these may influence the decision as to whether patients could be referred for specialist treatment.

The placement of implants in the posterior maxillary region, with limited amounts of bone and atrophied ridges, has always been seen as a difficult procedure that may require further surgical procedures, such as sinus elevation and sub-antral augmentation techniques. Clinicians have tended either to avoid these procedures or regard this as a distinct contra-indication to treatment.

This paper presents two groups of seven patients in whom implants of the same size and diameter were placed but which were extended either 2 mm or 4 mm beyond the sinus floor. The authors followed an accepted clinical assessment and treatment protocol, which is described in the paper. One-year review with digital orthopantograms and dental computed tomography showed a satisfactory outcome in all cases with non-significant complications.

The study proved that sinus-protruding implants could be used as a less complicated procedure compared with other surgical options, the procedure being less time-consuming and economically more acceptable with good functional stability and fair loading.