References

Edwards A, Elwyn G, Mulley A. Explaining risks: turning data into meaningful pictures. Br Med J. 2002; 324:827-830
: GDC; 2013
The World Health Report: Defining and Assessing Risks to Health. 2002;
Lang N, Suvan J, Tonetti M. Risk factor assessment tools for the prevention of periodontitis progression: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2014; 42:S59-S70
NICE. Oral and Dental Health Overview. http://pathways.nice.org.uk/pathways/oral-and-dental-health (Accessed 17.10.2017)
Preparing for practice: dental team learning outcomes for registration. 2015;
Type 2 Diabetes: prevention in people at high risk. 2012;
Cardiovascular disease: risk assessment and reduction, including lipid modification. 2014;
Jackson R, Wells S. Prediction is difficult, particularly about the future. Arch Intern Med. 2007; 167:(21)2286-2287
Persson R, Attstrom R, Lang NP, Page RC. Perceived risk of deteriorating periodontal conditions. J Clin Periodontol. 2003; 30:982-989
Persson R, Mancl L, Martin J, Page RC. Assessing periodontal disease risk: a comparison of clinicians' assessment versus a computerized tool. J Am Dent Assoc. 2003; 134:575-582
Page RC, Martin J, Krall EA, Mancl L, Garcia R. Longitudinal validation of a risk calculator for periodontal disease. J Clin Periodontol. 2003; 30:819-827
Lang NP, Tonetti MS. Periodontal risk assessment (PRA) for patients in supportive periodontal therapy (SPT). Oral Health Prevent Dent. 2003; 1:7-16
Gonzalez-Cabezas Fontana M Minimal intervention dentistry: part 2. Caries risk assessment in adults. Br Dent J. 2012; 213:447-451
Busby M, Martin JA, Matthews R, Burke FJ, Chapple I. The relationship between oral health risk and disease status and age, and the significance for general dental practice funding by capitation. Br Dent J. 2014; 217
Axelsson P. Periodontitis is preventable. J Periodontol. 2014; 85::1303-1307
Weinstein N. Unrealistic optimism about susceptibility to health problems: conclusions from a community–wide sample. J Behav Med. 1986; 10:481-500
Edwards AGK, Hood K, Matthews EJ The effectiveness of one to one risk communication interventions in health care: a systematic review. Med Decis Making. 2000; 20:290-297
Misra S, Daly B, Dunne S Dentist-patient communication: what do dentists and patients remember following a consultation. Implications for patient compliance. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2013; 7:543-549
Newton T, Asimakopoulou K. Managing oral hygiene as a risk factor for periodontal disease: a systematic review of psychological approaches to behaviour change for improved plaque control in periodontal management. J Clin Periodontol. 2015; 42:S36-S46
Asimakopoulou K, Newton T, Daly B, Kutzer Y, Ide M. The effects of providing periodontal disease risk information on psychological and clinical outcomes: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2015; 42:350-355
Asimakopoulou K, Nolan M, McCarthy C, Newton T. The effects of goal-setting, planning and self-monitoring (GPS) on behavioural and periodontal outcomes: a randomised controlled trial (RCT). 2017;

Oral health risk assessment

From Volume 45, Issue 9, October 2018 | Pages 841-847

Authors

Liz Chapple

BA(Hons), ACA

Director, Oral Health Innovations Ltd (UK supplier of PreViser™ and DEPPA technology)

Articles by Liz Chapple

Zehra Yonel

BDS, MFDS RCS(Ed), FHEA

Department of Periodontology, Birmingham Dental Hospital, St Chad's Queensway, Birmingham B4 6NN, UK

Articles by Zehra Yonel

Abstract

Evidence shows that the use of validated risk assessment tools helps healthcare professionals to predict patients' likelihood of developing a disease with greater accuracy. Risk assessment tools have been shown to be beneficial in assisting professionals to communicate findings to patients. The psychological benefits of risk assessment tools have also been demonstrated in terms of positive behavioural change.

CPD/Clinical Relevance: With the current shift towards preventive approaches to healthcare, risk assessment can assist in directing resources and prevention programmes to those patients most in need.

Article

Oral health risk assessment involves the comprehensive assessment of hereditary, clinical and lifestyle factors which impact upon the likelihood of developing oral disease, the findings of which are used to support decision-making in planning preventive care for the patient. Edwards et al described the most effective ways of communicating risk messages to patients.1 Of primary importance is the discussion of those factors with the patient, a conversation which is facilitated through a risk-targeted questionnaire. At the end of the assessment patients should be sufficiently informed such that the derived risk banding does not come as a surprise to them. To have any credibility, risk assessment must use the best available research and evidence base to categorize that patient into risk bands (either numerical or on a traffic light scale). These bandings should enable patients to understand how their risk compares with that of the rest of the population. To carry impact, risk assessment should also encompass providing patients with personalized written reports which document their individualized risk and what they can do about it. Most importantly, the process transfers to patients the knowledge and responsibility for securing their future health.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available