References

Office for National Statistics. Ageing. http://www.statistics.gov.uk/cci/nugget.asp?id=949
Kelly M, Steele J, Nuttal N Adult Dental Health Survey – Oral Health in the United Kingdom in 1998.London: The Stationery Office;
Haraldsson T, Karlsson U, Carlsson GE. Bite force and oral function in complete denture wearers. J Oral Rehab. 1979; 6:41-48
Glossary of prosthodontic terms. J Prosthet Dent. 2005; 94:(1)10-92
Boerrigter EM, Stegenga B, Raghoebar GM, Boering G. Patient satisfaction and chewing ability with implant-retained mandibular: a comparison with new complete dentures with or without preprosthetic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 53:1167-1173
Preiskel HW, Preiskel A. Precision attachments for the 21st century. Dent Update. 2009; 36:221-227
Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U, Brånemark P-I, Jemt T. A long term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants of totally edentulous jaws. J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1990; Apr:347-359
Feine JS, Carlsson GE, Awad MA The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. Mandibular two-implant overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patients. Gerodontology. 2002; 19:(1)3-4
Hellden LB, Derand T, Johansson S, Lindberg A. The CrescoTi Precision method: description of a simplified method to fabricate superstructures with passive fit to osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent. 1999; 82:487-491
Rubeling G. New techniques in spark erosion: the solution to an accurately fitting screw-retained implant restoration. Quintessence Int. 1999; 30:(1)38-48
Eisenmann E, Mokabberi A, Walter MH, Freesmeyer WB. Improving the fit of implant-supported superstructures using the spark erosion technique. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004; 19:(6)810-818
Enkling N Immediate Loading of Interforaminal Implants using a Chairside-fabricated Bar.: European Association for Osseointegration;

Retention systems for implant-retained overdentures

From Volume 40, Issue 1, January 2013 | Pages 28-31

Authors

Ronuk Vasant

BDS(Lond), MFDS RCS(Ed), MClinDent(Lond), MRD RCS(Eng)

Specialist in Prosthodontics, Senior Clinical Teaching Fellow, UCL Eastman CPD, London

Articles by Ronuk Vasant

Manjul K Vasant

MBE, MGDS RCS(Eng), MGDS RCS(Ed), FFGDP(UK), FDS RCS(Ed), DipDentImp(RCS Eng)

Specialist in Prosthodontics, Private Practitioner, London, UK

Articles by Manjul K Vasant

Abstract

There have been demographic and cultural changes in the past few decades with regards to edentulism. Conventional mucosa-borne dentures can be poorly accepted by some patients. Implant overdentures have a useful role to play in the treatment of some of these patients. Some form of attachment mechanism between the implants and the prosthesis is normally required. This paper updates the reader on the different types of attachment systems and bars available.

Clinical Relevance: It is important that dentists and technicians are able to understand the advantages and disadvantages of different attachment types for overdentures, in order to select the most appropriate technique for each patient.

Article

Despite improvements in oral health seen in the UK since the 1970s, the preliminary results from the 2009 Adult Dental Health Survey have shown that 6% of the adult population of England and Wales were edentulous.1 Although this is a large reduction from 37% in 1968, it means that there is still a significant demand for complete dentures.2 Furthermore, the population as a whole is ageing, with increased numbers living beyond their 85th birthdays. People are also becoming edentulous later in life, with partially dentate adults becoming the norm until old age.1 The combination of these demographic changes means that the edentulous group can be extremely challenging to treat effectively for a variety of social, psychological, physiological, biomechanical and anatomical reasons.

Whilst the majority of patients is reasonably happy with a well made upper complete denture, many are not as satisfied with a lower complete denture. Patients frequently complain of looseness and social embarrassment due to movement of the prosthesis during function. It is recognized that patients with complete dentures function with lower occlusal forces than subjects with natural teeth.3 This can lead to reduced masticatory efficiency.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available