References

Daou E. The elastomers for complete denture impression: a review of the literature. Saudi Dent J. 2010; 22:153-160
Guides to Standards in Prosthetic Dentistry – Complete and Partial Dentures. In: Ogden A (ed). London: Quintessence Publishing Co Ltd; 1996
Abree NS, Fleck S, Askinas SW. The results of a brief survey of complete denture prosthodontic techniques in predoctoral programs in North American dental schools. J Prosthodont. 1998; 5:219-225
Rao S, Chowdhary R, Mahoorkar S. Systematic review of impression technique for conventional complete dentures. J Ind Prosthodont Soc. 2010; 10:(2)105-111
Carlsson GE, Anders Ortorp A, Omar R. What is the evidence base for the efficacies of different complete denture impression procedures? A critical review. J Dent. 2013; 41:17-23
McCord JF, Grant AA. Impression Making. Br Dent J. 2000; 188:484-492
Sato Y, Tsuga K, Akagawa Y, Tenma H. A method for quantifying complete denture quality. J Prosthet Dent. 1998; 80:52-57
Hyde TP, McCord JF. Survey of prosthodontic impression procedures for complete dentures in general practice in the United Kingdom. J Prosthet Dent. 1999; 51:295-299
Duncan JP, Taylor TD. Teaching an abbreviated impression technique for complete dentures in an undergraduate dental curriculum. J Prosthet Dent. 2001; 85:121-125
Massad JJ, Cagna DR. Vinyl polysiloxane impression material in removable prosthodontics. Part 1: Edentulous impressions. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2007; 28:(8)452-459
Rosentiel E. Rubber base elastic impression materials (a preliminary note). Br Dent J. 1955; 98:392-394
Smith DE, Toolson LB, Bolender CL One-step border molding of complete denture impressions using a polyether impression material. J Prosthet Dent. 1979; 41:347-351
Christensen GJ. Impression materials for complete and partial prosthodontics. Dent Clin North Am. 1984; 28:223-237
Appelbaum EM, Mehra RV. Clinical evaluation of polyvinylsiloxane for complete denture impressions. J Prosthet Dent. 1984; 52:537-539
Chaffee NR, Cooper LF, Felton DA. A technique for border moulding edentulous impressions using vinyl polysiloxane material. J Prosthodont. 1999; 8:129-134
Hayakawa I, Watanabe I. Impressions for complete dentures using new silicone impression materials. Quintessence Int. 2003; 34:177-180
Lynch CD, Allen PF. Management of the flabby ridge: using contemporary materials to solve an old problem. Br Dent J. 2006; 200:258-261
Terry ED, Winston WL. A review of contemporary impression materials and techniques. Dent Clin North Am. 2004; 48:(2)445-470

Complete denture impressions: a simplified impression technique vs conventional technique for edentulous patients

From Volume 41, Issue 9, November 2014 | Pages 840-850

Authors

Ravishankar Krishna

BDS, MDS

Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, MS Ramaiah Dental College and Hospital, Bangalore

Articles by Ravishankar Krishna

Satyabodh S Guttal

BDS, MDS, MFPT

Professor, Department of Prosthodontics SDM College of Dental Sciences, Dharwad

Articles by Satyabodh S Guttal

Saritha M Shetty

Postgraduate Student, Department of Prosthodontics SDM College of Dental Sciences, Dharwad

Articles by Saritha M Shetty

Vibha Shetty

BDS, MDS

Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, MS Ramaiah Dental College and Hospital, Bangalore

Articles by Vibha Shetty

Meera Singh

Postgraduate Student, Department of Prosthodontics, MS Ramaiah Dental College and Hospital, Bangalore

Articles by Meera Singh

B Neeraja

Postgraduate Student, Department of Prosthodontics, MS Ramaiah Dental College and Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India

Articles by B Neeraja

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to use a simplified impression technique, which is an alternative to the conventional method for complete denture fabrication. This was introduced to reduce the number of patient visits, operator time, as well as to compare the efficacy of a simplified impression technique (single appointment impression) with the conventional method (two appointments – primary and final impression).

Clinical Relevance: The simplified edentulous impression technique reduces the number of patient visits when compared with the conventional technique, without compromising the principles of definitive impression-taking.

Article

An impression is a record of mouth tissues taken at an unstrained rest position or in various positions of displacement.1 The impression stage of constructing complete dentures is to design the denture bases to the optimum denture-supporting area and to ensure that the border form of the prostheses provides a functional peripheral seal. It is generally agreed by the British Society of Prosthodontics (BSSPD) in their guidelines that meeting these objectives achieves denture stability and retention, and enables effective function.2 Many different concepts and approaches have been described to achieve these goals, along with specific materials and techniques by which the given objectives might be accomplished. Even though there are wide variations in individual preferences for a particular material or method, most US dental schools believe that, for a successful outcome, a two-appointment (primary and final impression) procedure is required.3 However, there is a lack of strong evidence as to whether one material is superior or a particular technique would produce better long-term results in terms of complete denture performance.4

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available