References

Soskolne WA, Chajek T, Flashner M An in vivo study of the chlorhexidine release profile of the PerioChip (TM) in the gingival crevicular fluid, plasma and urine. J Clin Periodontol. 1998; 25:1017-1021
Paolantonio M, D'Angelo M, Grassi RF Clinical and microbiologic effects of subgingival controlled-release delivery of chlorhexidine chip in the treatment of periodontitis: a multicenter study. J Periodontol. 2008; 79:271-282
Grenier D, Bertrand J, Mayrand D. Porphyromonas-gingivalis outer-membrane vesicles promote bacterial-resistance to chlorhexidine. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 1995; 10:319-320
Soskolne WA, Heasman PA, Stabholz A Sustained local delivery of chlorhexidine in the treatment of periodontitis: a multi-center study. J Periodontol. 1997; 68:32-38
Jeffcoat MK, Bray KS, Ciancio SG Adjunctive use of a subgingival controlled-release chlorhexidine chip reduces probing depth and improves attachment level compared with scaling and root planing alone. J Periodontol. 1998; 69:989-997
Azmak N, Atilla G, Luoto H, Sorsa T. The effect of subgingival controlled-release delivery of chlorhexidine chip on clinical parameters and matrix metalloproteinase-8 levels in gingival crevicular fluid. J Periodontol. 2002; 73:608-615
Grisi DC, Salvador SL, Figueiredo LC, Souza SLS, Novaes AB, Grisi MFM. Effect of a controlled-release chlorhexidine chip on clinical and microbiological parameters of periodontal syndrome. J Clin Periodontol. 2002; 29:875-881
Jeffcoat MK, Palcanis KG, Weatherford TW, Reese M, Geurs NC, Flashner M. Use of a biodegradable chlorhexidine chip in the treatment of adult periodontitis: clinical and radiographic findings. J Periodontol. 2000; 71:256-262
Rodrigues IFG, Machion L, Casati MZ Clinical evaluation of the use of locally delivered chlorhexidine in periodontal maintenance therapy. J Periodontol. 2007; 78:624-628
Paolantonio M, D'Ercole S, Pilloni A Clinical, microbiologic, and biochemical effects of subgingival administration of a xanthan-based chlorhexidine gel in the treatment of periodontitis: a randomized multicenter trial. J Periodontol. 2009; 80:1479-1492
Cosyn J, Sabzevar MM. A systematic review on the effects of subgingival chlorhexidine gel administration in the treatment of chronic periodontitis. J Periodontol. 2005; 76:1805-1813
Anand V, Govila V, Gulati M, Anand B, Jhingaran R, Rastogi P. Chlorhexidine–thymol varnish as an adjunct to scaling and root planing: a clinical observation. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2012; 2:83-89
Friesen LR, Williams KB, Krause LS, Killoy WJ. Controlled local delivery of tetracycline with polymer strips in the treatment of periodontitis. J Periodontol. 2002; 73:13-19
Williams RC, Paquette DW, Offenbacher S Treatment of periodontitis by local administration of minocycline microspheres: a controlled trial. J Periodontol. 2001; 72:1535-1544
Paquette D, Minsk L, Lessem J, Santucci E. A pharmacokinetic study of a locally delivered minocycline therapeutic system(MPTS). J Clin Periodontol. 2000; 27
Walker C, Santucci E. The effect of a locally delivered minocycline periodontal therapeutic system(MPTS) on the fecal flora. J Clin Periodontol. 2000; 27
Bogren A, Teles RP, Torresyap G, Haffajee AD, Socransky SS, Wennstrom JL. Locally delivered doxycycline during supportive periodontal therapy: a 3-year study. J Periodontol. 2008; 79:827-835
Srirangarajan S, Mundargi RC, Ravindra S, Setty SB, Aminabhavi TM, Thakur S. Randomized, controlled, single-masked, clinical study to compare and evaluate the efficacy of microspheres and gel in periodontal pocket therapy. J Periodontol. 2011; 82:114-121
Leiknes T, Leknes KN, Boe OE, Skavland RJ, Lie T. Topical use of a metronidazole gel in the treatment of sites with symptoms of recurring chronic inflammation. J Periodontol. 2007; 78:1538-1544
Chaturvedi TP, Srivastava R, Srivastava AK, Gupta V, Verma PK. Evaluation of metronidazole nanofibers in patients with chronic periodontitis: a clinical study. Inter J Pharm Invest. 2012; 2:213-217
Pradeep AR, Sagar SV, Daisy H. Clinical and microbiologic effects of subgingivally delivered 0.5% azithromycin in the treatment of chronic periodontitis. J Periodontol. 2008; 79:2125-2135
Agarwal E, Pradeep AR, Bajaj P, Naik SB. Efficacy of local drug delivery of 0.5% clarithromycin gel as an adjunct to non-surgical periodontal therapy in the treatment of current smokers with chronic periodontitis: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Periodontol. 2012; 83:1155-1163
Kathariya R, Pradeep AR, Raghavendra NM, Gaikwad R. Evaluation of subgingivally delivered 0.5% clarithromycin as an adjunct to nonsurgical mechanotherapy in the management of chronic periodontitis: a short-term double blinded randomized control trial. J Invest Clin Dent. 2014; 5:23-31
Flemmig TF, Petersilka G, Volp A Efficacy and safety of adjunctive local moxifloxacin delivery in the treatment of periodontitis. J Periodontol. 2011; 82:96-105
Pradeep AR, Rao NS, Naik SB, Kumari M. Efficacy of varying concentrations of subgingivally delivered metformin in the treatment of chronic periodontitis: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Periodontol. 2013; 84:212-220
Lane N, Armitage GC, Loomer P Bisphosphonate therapy improves the outcome of conventional periodontal treatment: results of a 12-month, randomized, placebo-controlled study. J Periodontol. 2005; 76:1113-1122
Sharma A, Pradeep AR. Clinical efficacy of 1% alendronate gel as a local drug delivery system in the treatment of chronic periodontitis: a randomized, controlled clinical trial. J Periodontol. 2012; 83:11-18
Sharma A, Pradeep AR. Clinical efficacy of 1% alendronate gel in adjunct to mechanotherapy in the treatment of aggressive periodontitis: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Periodontol. 2012; 83:19-26
Mundy G, Garrett R, Harris S Stimulation of bone formation in vitro and in rodents by statins. Science. 1999; 286:1946-1949
Pradeep AR, Thorat MS. Clinical effect of subgingivally delivered simvastatin in the treatment of patients with chronic periodontitis: a randomized clinical trial. J Periodontol. 2010; 81:214-222
Krayer JW, Leite RS, Kirkwood KL. Non-surgical chemotherapeutic treatment strategies for the management of periodontal diseases. Dent Clin North Am. 2010; 54:13-33
Panwar M, Gupta SH. Local drug delivery with tetracycline fiber: an alternative to surgical periodontal therapy. Med J Armed Forces India. 2009; 65:244-246
van Steenberghe D, Rosling B, Soder PO A 15-month evaluation of the effects of repeated subgingival minocycline in chronic adult periodontitis. J Periodontol. 1999; 70:657-667
Bonito AJ, Lux L, Lohr KN. Impact of local adjuncts to scaling and root planing in periodontal disease therapy: a systematic review. J Periodontol. 2005; 76:1227-1236

Local drug delivery in the management of periodontal diseases part 2: specific agents

From Volume 41, Issue 9, November 2014 | Pages 796-810

Authors

Jane E Eastham

BDS(Hons)

Research Assistant, School of Dental Sciences, Newcastle University, Framlington Place, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE2 4BW, UK

Articles by Jane E Eastham

Robin A Seymour

BDS, FDS RCS, FDS RCS(Edin), PhD, FHKAMS

Dean of Dentistry and Professor of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dental Sciences, Newcastle University, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4BW, UK

Articles by Robin A Seymour

Abstract

Local drug delivery systems (LDDs) are mainly used as adjuncts to root surface instrumentation (RSI) in the management of periodontal disease. A range of antibacterial agents have been used for this purpose and include the tetracyclines, chlorhexidine, metronidazole, azithromycin, clarithromycin and moxifloxacin. More recently, other non-antibacterial agents have been incorporated into local delivery devices and include simvastatin, metformin and alendronate. This paper will review the effectiveness of such agents when used as an adjunct to conventional non-surgical periodontal therapy.

Clinical Relevance: The benefits of adjunctive use of local drug delivery in the management of periodontal disease will be discussed.

Article

Chlorhexidine gluconate is active against a broad spectrum of microbes. The CHX molecule, owing to its positive charge, reacts with the microbial cell surface, destroys the integrity of the cell membrane, penetrates into the cell, precipitates the cytoplasm, and the bacterial cell dies.

In the early 1980s, the first slow release device containing CHX incorporated into a non-degradable matrix was introduced. A second generation slow release device was formulated and this is now available as the product PerioChip®. The chip is rounded at one end for insertion into periodontal pockets. Its physico-chemical properties are shown in Table 1. One PerioChip® is inserted into a periodontal pocket with a probing pocket depth (PD) greater than or equal to 5 mm. Up to 8 PerioChips® may be inserted at different sites in a single visit. Treatment is recommended once every three months in pockets with PD remaining greater or equal to 5 mm. The periodontal pocket should be isolated and the surrounding area dried prior to chip insertion up to its maximum depth. The PerioChip® does not need to be removed as it biodegrades completely and releases CHX over a 7–10 day period.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available