References

Wheeler RC., 7th edn. Philadelphia: W B Saunders Company; 1993
Hua F, He H, Ngan P, Bouzid W. Prevalence of peg-shaped permanent lateral incisors: a meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Ortho. 2013; 144:97-109
Thesleff I. Genetic basis of tooth development and dental defects. Acta Odontol Scand. 2000; 58:191-194
Fleischmannova J, Matalova E, Tucker AS, Sharpe PT. Mouse models of tooth abnormalities. Eur J Oral Sci. 2008; 116:1-10
Hobkirk JA, Goodman JR, Jones SP. Presenting complaints and findings in a group of patients attending a hypodontia clinic. Br Dent J. 1994; 177:(9)337-339
Brook AH. A unifying aetiological explanation for anomalies of human tooth number and size. Arch Oral Biol. 1984; 29:(5)373-378
Brook AH. Variables and criteria in prevalence studies of dental anomalies of number, form and size. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1975; 3:(6)288-293
Brin I, Becker A, Shalhav M. Position of the maxillary permanent canine in relation to the anomalous or missing lateral incisors: a population study. Eur J Ortho. 1986; 8:(1)12-16
Becker A, Smith P, Behar R. The incidence of anomalous maxillary lateral incisors in relation to palatally displaced cuspids. Angle Orthod. 1981; 51:24-29
Nixon PJ, Robinson S, Gahan M, Chan MF. Conservative aesthetic techniques for discoloured teeth: 2. Microabrasion and composite. Dent Update. 2007; 34:(3)160-166
Carter NE, Gillgrass TJ, Hobson RS, Jepson N, Meechan JG, Nohl FS, Nunn JH. The interdisciplinary management of hypodontia: orthodontics. Br Dent J. 2003; 194:361-366
Gill DS, Naini FB, Tredwin CJ. Smile aesthetics. Dent Update. 2007; 34:(3)152-154
Kokich VO, Kinzer GA. Managing congenitally missing lateral incisors: Part 1. Canine substitution. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2005; 17:(1)5-10
McNeill RW, Joondeph DR. Congenitally absent maxillary lateral incisors: treatment planning considerations. Angle Orthod. 1973; 43:24-29
Senty EL. The maxillary cuspid and missing lateral incisors: esthetics and occlusion. Angle Orthod. 1976; 46:(4)365-371
Ricketts RM. The biologic significance of the divine proportion and Fibonacci series. Am J Orthod. 1982; 81:(5)351-370

Management of microdont maxillary lateral incisors

From Volume 41, Issue 10, December 2014 | Pages 867-874

Authors

Sadaf Khan

BDS, MSc, MOrth, FDSOrth

Consultant Orthodontist, Eastman Dental Hospital and the John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford

Articles by Sadaf Khan

Daljit Gill

BDS(Hons), BSc(Hons), MSc, FDS RCS, MOrth RCS, FDS(Orth) RCS(Eng), FHEA

Locum Consultant Orthodontist, The Royal London, Oxford Radcliffeand Stoke Mandeville Hospitals

Articles by Daljit Gill

G Steve Bassi

BDS, LDS RCS, FDS RCPS(Glasg), FDS RCS(Ed), FDS(Rest Dent) RCPS, MDentSci

Consultant in Restorative Dentistry, Eastman Dental Hospital, 256 Grays Inn Road, London WC1X 8LD, UK

Articles by G Steve Bassi

Abstract

Maxillary microdont lateral incisors can have significant implications on the development of the permanent dentition in terms of the eruption of maxillary permanent canines, as well as on the aesthetics of the upper labial segment and the overall occlusion, depending on the extent of microdontia. This paper describes the aetiology, clinical implications and management of the maxillary microdont lateral incisor.

Clinical Relevance: The definitive management of the maxillary microdont lateral incisor may involve either a restorative or orthodontic approach or, in some cases, a combined orthodontic-restorative approach.

Article

The term ‘microdont teeth’ or microdontia refers to teeth that are developmentally small, often in three dimensions. The normal crown height of the maxillary lateral incisor is 9 mm, the length of the root is about 13 mm, the mesiodistal crown diameter is about 6.5 mm and the labiolingual crown dimension is about 6 mm.1 The term ‘microdont’ or peg-shaped lateral incisors refers to lateral incisor teeth that have either a reduced mesiodistal width and/or a reduction in the vertical height. These teeth are more often maxillary lateral incisors as opposed to mandibular and may be unilaterally or bilaterally microdont. The overall prevalence of peg-shaped maxillary permanent lateral incisors is 1.8%.2 The occurrence rates are higher in Down's syndrome (3.1%) than in Afro-Caribbean (1.5%) and Caucasian (1.3%) patients, and in orthodontic patients (2.7%) than in the general population (1.6%) and dental patients (1.9%). Women are 1.35 times more likely than men to have peg-shaped maxillary permanent lateral incisors. The prevalence rates of unilateral (0.8%) and bilateral peg-shaped maxillary permanent lateral incisors are approximately the same.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available