References

McNair A, Morris D. Managing the Developing Occlusion.London: British Orthodontic Society; 2010
Fragiskos F, Tsitsioganis H. Oral Surgery.Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg; 2007
Ericson S, Kurol J. Early treatment of palatally erupting maxillary canines by extraction of the primary canines. Europ J Orthod. 1988; 10:283-295
Kokich V. Surgical and orthodontic management of impacted maxillary canines. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004; 126:278-283
Coulthard P, Horner K, Sloan P, Theaker E. Master Dentistry.Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2003

The surgical removal of an impacted canine: diagnosis, investigations and technique

From Volume 45, Issue 8, September 2018 | Pages 773-776

Authors

Zarish Rahman

BDS(Hons), MFDS, PGCert(Dent Ed)

Orthodontic Specialty Registrar, Birmingham Dental Hospital, 5 Mill Pool Way, Birmingham B5 7EG, UK

Articles by Zarish Rahman

Hamnah Azam

BDS (Birmingham)

Dental Core Trainee Year 1, Arrowe Park Hospital, 5 Mill Pool Way, Birmingham B5 7EG, UK

Articles by Hamnah Azam

Bilal Ahmed

BDS, DDPH, MSc, MFDS

Res Associate Professor Department of Prosthodontics National University of Science & Technology (NUST), Islamabad, Pakistan

Articles by Bilal Ahmed

Abstract

Abstract:

Impacted canines occur in 1.7% of the population. These cases may be seen in general practice for further referral to an orthodontist or oral surgeon. Diagnosis often involves clinical examination, palpation and radiographic imaging to ascertain the location and association with anatomical structures. By using a clinical case, this paper aims to demonstrate one conservative way of managing the removal of impacted maxillary canines.

CPD/Clinical Relevance: Canine impactions can cause resorption to adjacent teeth. They may require orthodontic traction to be brought into alignment but in some cases surgical removal is necessary.

Article

The surgical removal of impacted maxillary canines is a commonly performed procedure in oral surgery. Indications for this procedure include impacted canines causing root resorption or hindrance of eruption of other teeth and canines undergoing cystic change.1,2 During this process, diagnosis and investigation are achieved through clinical examination, palpation and radiographic imaging. Clinicians routinely use the horizontal or vertical parallax technique which involves using radiographic images taken at different angulations. This is usually performed to help determine the location of the impacted tooth. High quality radiographic imaging in the maxillary incisal region may also help identify local anatomical features, such as the nasopalatine foramen. It is important to identify such features during the surgical treatment planning stages.

A 19-year-old female was referred to the oral surgery department for the orthodontic extractions of her retained URC and ULC to aid management of her impacted canines.3 Upon clinical and radiographic investigations, it was determined that the maxillary canines were positioned unfavourably and would not be suitable for orthodontic extrusion; thus needing to be surgically removed.4 The patient had an underlying skeletal malocclusion that required a bimaxillary osteotomy. However, the patient was not keen on orthognathic surgery. Thus it was agreed by the orthodontist and patient to mask her bimaxillary proclination with orthodontic camouflage, by removing her impacted canines and bringing her maxillary first premolars anteriorly to mimic canines.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available