References

Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005; 55:74-108
Pu JJ, Choi WS, Yu P Do predetermined surgical margins compromise oncological safety in computer-assisted head and neck reconstruction?. Oral Oncol. 2020; 111 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.104914
Lee ZH, Alfonso AR, Ramly EP The latest evolution in virtual surgical planning: customized reconstruction plates in free fibula flap mandibular reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020; 146:872-879 https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000007161
Uribe S, Rojas LA, Rosas CF. Accuracy of imaging methods for detection of bone tissue invasion in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013; 42 https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20120346
Goel V, Parihar PS, Parihar A Accuracy of MRI in prediction of tumour thickness and nodal stage in oral tongue and gingivobuccal cancer with clinical correlation and staging. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016; 10:TC01-5 https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2016/17411.7905
Czerwonka L, Bissada E, Goldstein DP High-resolution cone-beam computed tomography for assessment of bone invasion in oral cancer: comparison with conventional computed tomography. Head Neck. 2017; 39:2016-2020 https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.24858
Hirsch DL, Garfein ES, Christensen AM Use of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing to produce orthognathically ideal surgical outcomes: a paradigm shift in head and neck reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009; 67:2115-2122
Levine JP, Bae JS, Soares M Jaw in a day: total maxillofacial reconstruction using digital technology. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013; 131:1386-1391
Kirke DN, Owen RP, Carrao V, Miles BA, Kass JI. Using 3D computer planning for complex reconstruction of mandibular defects. Cancers Head Neck. 2016; 1 https://doi.org/10.1186/s41199-016-0019-4
Chang EI, Jenkins MP, Patel SA, Topham NS. Long-term operative outcomes of preoperative computed tomography-guided virtual surgical planning for osteocutaneous free flap mandible reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016; 137:619-623
Chan HH, Siewerdsen JH, Vescan A 3D rapid prototyping for otolaryngology-head and neck surgery: applications in image-guidance, surgical simulation and patient-specific modeling. PLoS One. 2015; 10 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136370
Powcharoen W, Yang WF, Yan Li K Computer-assisted versus conventional freehand mandibular reconstruction with fibula free flap: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019; 144:1417-1428 https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000006261
Zweifel DF, Simon C, Hoarau R Are virtual planning and guided surgery for head and neck reconstruction economically viable?. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015; 73:170-175 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2014.07.038
Vimawala S, Gao T, Goldfarb J Initial experience using 3-dimensional printed models for head and neck reconstruction in Haiti. Ear Nose Throat J. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1177/0145561320938920
Koumoullis H, Burley O, Kyzas P. Patient-specific soft tissue reconstruction: an IDEAL stage I report of hemiglossectomy reconstruction and introduction of the PANSOFOS flap. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020; 58:681-686 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.04.017
Li C, Cai Y, Wang W Combined application of virtual surgery and 3D printing technology in postoperative reconstruction of head and neck cancers. BMC Surg. 2019; 19 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-019-0616-3
Rose A, Kim H, Fuchs H, Frahm JM. Development of augmented reality applications in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery. Laryngoscope. 2019; 129:S1-S11

3D Sequencing and Protocols in Head and Neck Reconstructive Surgery: Delivering Predictable Results

From Volume 49, Issue 4, April 2022 | Pages 336-340

Authors

Hussein Mohamedbhai

MRCS, MFDS, BM, BDS, MMedSc

Oral and Maxillofacial StR

Articles by Hussein Mohamedbhai

Email Hussein Mohamedbhai

Abigail Chan

Medical Student

Articles by Abigail Chan

Bhavin Visavadia

FRCS, FDS

Consultant Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon; Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Northwick Park Hospital, London North West Healthcare Trust

Articles by Bhavin Visavadia

Abstract

The complex nature of head and neck anatomy poses a significant challenge in facial reconstruction, both in functional and aesthetic outcomes. This necessitates that any resection of disease and reconstruction should not only consider the defect, but also the changes in appearance, speech and swallow. High-fidelity 3D planning improves both the outcomes of the resection and the reconstruction. This article presents an up-to-date review of the literature of the role of 3D planning, the stages and requirements of how to sequence head and neck reconstructions, and the future role of 3D planning. We outline the advantages that 3D sequencing affords both the patient and the surgeon, alongside a case report.

CPD/Clinical Relevance: The latest advances in oral cancer planning and reconstruction are described and a step-by-step guide to 3D sequencing and planning reconstruction is provided.

Article

Head and neck cancer is the sixth most common cancer worldwide, and its incidence is increasing.1 Despite advancements in medical treatments, the stalwart of management remains ablative surgery and primary reconstruction. The most challenging of these is free flap reconstruction. Free flap reconstruction is not just confined to reconstruction of malignancy, but its role extends to other pathologies, including ameloblastoma, and reconstruction following the sequela of radiotherapy, osteoradionecrosis. However, management of these cases still poses numerous and interplaying obstacles that affect surgical outcomes. Arguably, the most significant are the presence of tumour at the margins of the resection, and failure of the flap reconstruction. This article, alongside other published evidence, demonstrates that both of these major adverse outcomes can be mitigated with the advent of three-dimensional (3D) planning and sequencing.2

The advent of high-quality pre-operative imaging and computing power to enable reconstruction of these images, combined with advances in bioengineering, mean that is now possible to plan with a high level of accuracy and reliability both the resection of the tumour and the reconstruction of the defect. Through such detailed planning it can be possible to mitigate the risks of surgical failure, and at the same time push the envelope of what can be possible in head and neck reconstruction.3

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available