References

Dermal fillers. In: Goldberg DJ (ed). Basel: Karger; 2017
Kontis TC, Rivkin A. The history of injectable facial fillers. Facial Plast Surg. 2009; 25:67-72
Alghoul M, Codner MA. Retaining ligaments of the face: review of anatomy and clinical applications. Aesthet Surg J. 2013; 33:769-82 https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820X13495405
Department of Health. Review of the regulation of cosmetic interventions. 2013. https//tinyurl.com/3amac9ss (accessed July 2022)
Chiang YZ, Pierone G, Al-Niaimi F. Dermal fillers: pathophysiology, prevention and treatment of complications. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2017; 31:405-413 https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.13977
Sandoval SE, Cox JA, Koshy JC Facial fat compartments: a guide to filler placement. Semin Plast Surg. 2009; 23:283-287 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1242181
van Loghem JAJ, Humzah D, Kerscher M. Cannula versus sharp needle for placement of soft tissue fillers: an observational cadaver study. Aesthet Surg J. 2017; 38:73-88
Monheit GD, Rohrich RJ. The nature of long-term fillers and the risk of complications. Dermatol Surg. 2009; 35 Suppl 2:1598-1604
Chatrath V, Banerjee PS, Goodman GJ, Rahman E. Soft-tissue filler-associated blindness: a systematic review of case reports and case series. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019; 7
Colbert SD, Southorn BJ, Brennan PA, Ilankovan V. Perils of dermal fillers. Br Dent J. 2013; 214:339-340 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2013.326
Marusza W, Olszanski R, Sierdzinski J Treatment of late bacterial infections resulting from soft-tissue filler injections. Infect Drug Resist. 2019; 12:469-480
Lee JM, Kim YJ. Foreign body granulomas after the use of dermal fillers: pathophysiology, clinical appearance, histologic features, and treatment. Arch Plast Surg. 2015; 42:232-239
King M, Convery C, Davies E. This month's guideline: the use of hyaluronidase in aesthetic practice (v2.4). J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2018; 11:E61-E68

Background and complications of dermal fillers: the increasing use of non-surgical facial aesthetics in dental practice

From Volume 49, Issue 8, September 2022 | Pages 670-674

Authors

Tanya Ahmed

MFDS RCS

Dental Core Trainee, Royal Victoria Infirmary

Articles by Tanya Ahmed

Email Tanya Ahmed

SJ McCarthy

MFDS RCS, BMedSci (Hons), MFDS RCS

Dental Core Trainee, Royal Victoria Infirmary

Articles by SJ McCarthy

A Cartner

BDS

Dental Core Trainee, Royal Victoria Infirmary

Articles by A Cartner

RJJ Pilkington

FDS RCS OMFS

Registrar, Royal Victoria Infirmary

Articles by RJJ Pilkington

RS McCormick

FRCS OMFS, OMFS, FRCS OMFS

Consultant, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne

Articles by RS McCormick

Abstract

There has been a noticeable increase in the number of patients who present to oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) departments for treatment of post-operative complications of dermal fillers and botulinum toxin. These complications are more likely when the treatments are performed by untrained persons or self-administered by patients. Occasionally, these adverse outcomes cannot be avoided, even when products are administered by medically trained professionals. This review includes two cases and discusses some of the key issues surrounding these products so that patients can be informed of the benefits and risks with these types of non-surgical aesthetic procedures and, where possible, reduce the risk of complications occurring.

CPD/Clinical Relevance: Appropriate knowledge of facial anatomy and different types of dermal fillers is necessary to reduce the risk of complications associated with injection of these products.

Article

Currently, members of the public can purchase and place most dermal fillers without the need for a prescription or a medical licence because the products are classified as medical devices and not as prescription-only medicines. There is no requirement to be registered to a regulatory body in order to administer fillers, and no minimum qualifications are required. Data are limited on the number of people who self-administer dermal fillers. The increase in reported complications and the lack of regulation are potentially burdens to both patients and health services. Non-surgical facial aesthetics include:

The use of paraffin and Vaseline injections to augment the face dates back to the 1800s. Their use was associated with many complications and so the search for safer, more reliable and biocompatible materials began. In 1893, autologous fat injections were used to correct facial defects, the success of which was variable, relying heavily on adequate training, sterile technique and storage. Silicone use as a permanent facial filler remains controversial owing to the material's ability to migrate and form fistulas. In 1981, bovine collagen was the first agent to be approved for cosmetic injection by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Recently hyaluronic acid use has increased in popularity1 due to its skin smoothing and volume-producing effects that can generally last between 6 and 18 months.2

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available