References

Gilmore N, Sheiham A Overhanging dental restorations and periodontal disease. J Periodontol. 1971; 42:8-12
Leon AR Amalgam restorations and periodontal disease. Br Dent J. 1976; 140:377-382
Grasso JE, Nalbandian J, Sanford C, Bailit H Effect of restoration quality on periodontal health. J Prosthet Dent. 1985; 53:14-19

Comment (May) – perhaps the thumb technique wasn't so bad!

From Volume 45, Issue 7, July 2018 | Page 667

Authors

Philip Ower

MSc, BDS, MGDS RCS

Specialist in Periodontics, The Periodontal Practice, 21 Devonshire Place, London, and The Briars Dental Centre, Newbury

Articles by Philip Ower

Article

I would like, if I may, to add some personal comments to the excellent editorial on the ‘thumb technique’ in the May issue.

The late and inspirational Bernie Kieser is mentioned and I, no doubt along with all of his past students, remember Bernie quoting these papers purporting to show how restoration overhangs, and other so-called plaque retention factors, led to worsening periodontal conditions, and then showing us radiographs of such overhangs with no bone loss, while elsewhere in the same mouth there was bone loss around teeth which had no restorations! As Bernie used to say, a plaque retention factor is only a problem if the patient can't clean it; it's not a plaque retention factor if there is no plaque on it. As you rightly point out, in this respect a lump of calculus is no different from an amalgam overhang but, of course, Bernie was always misquoted in this respect, as you also mention.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available