References

Bernard JP, Schatz JP, Christou P, Belser U, Kiliaridis S Long-term vertical changes of the anterior maxillary teeth adjacent to single implants in young and mature adults. A retrospective study. J Clin Periodontol. 2004; 31:1024-1028
Cronin RJ, Oesterle LJ, Ranly DM Mandibular implants and the growing patient. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1994; 9:55-62
Strietzel FP, Reichart PA, Kale A Smoking interferes with the prognosis of dental implant treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2007; 34:523-544
Van der Weijden GA, van Bemmel KM, Renvert S Implant therapy in partially edentulous, periodontally compromised patients: a review. J Clin Periodontol. 2005; 32:506-511
Tarnow DP, Magner AW, Fletcher P The effect of the distance from the contact point to the crest of bone on the presence or absence of the interproximal dental papilla. J Periodontol. 1992; 63:995-996
Heitz-Mayfield LJ, Huynh-Ba G History of treated periodontitis and smoking as risks for implant therapy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009; 24:39-68
Hebel KS, Gajjar R Achieving superior esthetic results, parameters for implant and abutment selection. Int J Dent Symp. 1997; 4:42-47
Woelfel JB, 4th edn. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger; 1990
Hammerle CH, Chen ST, Wilson TG Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding the placement of implants in extraction sockets. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004; 19:26-28
Schropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L, Karring T Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study. Int J Periodont Restor Dent. 2003; 23:313-323
Araújo MG, Lindhe J Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 2005; 32:212-218
Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Polyzos IP, Felice P, Worthington HV Timing of implant placement after tooth extraction: immediate, immediate-delayed or delayed implants? A Cochrane systematic review. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2010; 3:189-205
Evian CI, Rosenberg ES, Coslet JG, Corn H The osteogenic activity of bone removed from healing extraction sockets in humans. J Periodontol. 1982; 53:81-85
Evans CD, Chen ST Esthetic outcomes of immediate implant placements. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008; 19:73-80
Buser D, Halbritter S, Hart C Early implant placement with simultaneous guided bone regeneration following single-tooth extraction in the esthetic zone: 12-month results of a prospective study with 20 consecutive patients. J Periodontol. 2009; 80:152-162
Choquet V, Hermans M, Adriaenssens P Clinical and radiographic evaluation of the papilla level adjacent to single-tooth dental implants. A retrospective study in the maxillary anterior region. J Periodontol. 2001; 72:1364-1371
Kourkouta S, Dedi KD, Paquette DW, Mol A Interproximal tissue dimensions in relation to adjacent implants in the anterior maxilla: clinical observations and patient aesthetic evaluation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009; 20:1375-1385

The role of dental implants in the management of dento-alveolar trauma part 2

From Volume 42, Issue 1, January 2015 | Pages 68-77

Authors

Eugene Gamble

BDS, MFD RCSI, MClinDent, MPerioRCSEd, FFD(Perio) RCSI

Specialist Postgraduate Trainee (Periodontology), Department of Restorative Dentistry, The Royal London Dental Hospital, New Road, London E1 1BB, UK

Articles by Eugene Gamble

Shakeel Shahdad

BDS, MMed Sc, FDS RCS(Edin), DDS

Consultant and Honorary Senior Clinical Lecturer, Department of Restorative Dentistry, The Royal London Dental Hospital, New Road, London E1 1BB, UK

Articles by Shakeel Shahdad

Abstract

Patients who suffer dento-alveolar trauma present a unique challenge for the dentist. There are numerous options to consider when attempting to restore the dentition. This article reviews the role of dental implants and how thorough planning and execution of such treatment could result in an optimal outcome.

Clinical Relevance: Knowledge of the role of dental implants and factors imperative for a successful treatment outcome will assist the clinician in achieving optimal restorative results.

Article

To date, there are no research studies that have specifically looked at the success and survival rates of implants in trauma patients. It is therefore assumed that the success rates are similar to implants placed in non-trauma patients. With that, the variables to take into account are identical to regular implant placement. There may, however, be an increased likelihood for the requirement of supplemental surgical techniques if anatomical deficiencies still exist after trauma, which have been discussed in the previous article.

When dental implants are contemplated in patients, the clinician should consider the following clinical parameters which will guide the treatment process and influence the outcome. These include:

The age of the patient is important when considering implants in young and still growing individuals. With increasing age there is continued vertical growth of the alveolar processes. Unlike a tooth, a dental implant osseointegrates and essentially is ankylosed to the bone. Therefore, implants placed in the growing patient will suffer from relative infra-occlusion1 where the surrounding structures continue their normal growth while the implant maintains its original position and appears to submerge.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available