References

Marcenes W, Kassebaum NJ, Bernabé E Global burden of oral conditions in 1990–2010: a systematic analysis. J Dent Res. 2013; 92:592-597
Sheiham A Dietary effects on dental diseases. Public Health Nutr. 2001; 4:(2B)569-591
Moynihan PJ, Kelly SAM Effect on caries of restricting sugars intake: systematic review to inform WHO guidelines. J Dent Res. 2014; 93:8-18
Bernabé E, Vehkalahti MM, Sheiham A Sugar-sweetened beverages and dental caries in adults: a 4-year prospective study. J Dent. 2014; 42:952-958
Masood M, Masood Y, Newton T Impact of national income and inequality on sugar and caries relationship. Caries Res. 2012; 46:581-588
Swinburn BA, Sacks G, Hall KD The global obesity pandemic: shaped by global drivers and local environments. Lancet. 2011; 378:804-814
Falbe J, Thompson HR, Becker CM Impact of the Berkeley Excise Tax on sugar-sweetened beverage consumption. Am J Public Health. 2016; 106:1865-1871 https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303362
Nakamura R, Mirelman AJ, Cuadrado C Evaluating the 2014 sugar-sweetened beverage tax in Chile: an observational study in urban areas. PLoS Med. 2018; 15:e1002596-e1002596
Eyles H, Ni Mhurchu C, Nghiem N, Blakely T Food pricing strategies, population diets, and non-communicable disease: a systematic review of simulation studies. PLoS Med. 2012; 9 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001353
Finkelstein EA, Zhen C, Bilger M Implications of a sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) tax when substitutions to non-beverage items are considered. J Health Econ. 2013; 32:219-239
Scarborough P, Adhikari V, Harrington RA Impact of the announcement and implementation of the UK Soft Drinks Industry Levy on sugar content, price, product size and number of available soft drinks in the UK, 2015–19: a controlled interrupted time series analysis. PLoS Med. 2020; 17:1-20
Cornelsen L, Mytton OT, Adams J Change in non-alcoholic beverage sales following a 10-pence levy on sugar-sweetened beverages within a national chain of restaurants in the UK: interrupted time series analysis of a natural experiment. J Epidemiol Commun Health. 2017; 71:1107-1112
Buckton CH, Fergie G, Leifeld P, Hilton S A discourse network analysis of UK newspaper coverage of the ‘sugar tax’ debate before and after the announcement of the Soft Drinks Industry Levy. BMC Public Health. 2019; 19 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6799-9
Duffey K, Steffen L, Horn L Dietary patterns matter: diet beverages and cardiometabolic risks in the longitudinal Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012; 95:909-915 https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.111.026682
Lussi A, Megert B, Shellis RP, Wang X Analysis of the erosive effect of different dietary substances and medications. Br J Nutr. 2012; 107:252-262
Sweet success: will sugar taxes improve health?. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017; 5 https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30070-0
Sánchez-Romero LM, Penko J, Coxson PG Projected impact of Mexico's sugar-sweetened beverage tax policy on diabetes and cardiovascular disease: a modeling study. PLoS Med. 2016; 13:1-17
Schwendicke F, Thomson WM, Broadbent JM, Stolpe M Effects of taxing sugar-sweetened beverages on caries and treatment costs. J Dent Res. 2016; 95:1327-1332
Briggs ADM, Mytton OT, Kehlbacher A Health impact assessment of the UK soft drinks industry levy: a comparative risk assessment modelling study. Lancet Public Health. 2017; 2:e15-22 https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(16)30037-8
Cornelsen L, Smith RD Viewpoint: soda taxes – four questions economists need to address. Food Policy. 2018; 74:138-142 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.12.003
Smith RD, Cornelsen L, Quirmbach D Are sweet snacks more sensitive to price increases than sugar-sweetened beverages: analysis of British food purchase data. BMJ Open. 2018; 8 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019788

Cariology: Why is the 2018 Soft Drinks Levy Important to Dentistry?

From Volume 48, Issue 1, January 2021 | Pages 8-11

Authors

Alice MG Parr

BDS (Hons), MSc (Dist), MFDS RCS (Ed), Clinical Lecturer in Restorative Dentistry (Fixed & Removable Prosthodontics), University of Birmingham.

Articles by Alice MG Parr

Email Alice MG Parr

Abstract

The link between sugar and caries is a well-established relationship and the efforts to reduce patient sugar intake is part of daily practice for a holistic clinician. Sugar taxation has been employed by many countries in an attempt to deal with the worldwide concern of non-communicable diseases. Taxation of sugar in the UK could increase its revenue, reduce sugar intake and affect caries incidence; considering how the sugar levy could shape the way caries is managed important.

Clinical Relevance: Review of modelling studies and actual change experienced in countries where tax has been implemented highlight what could happen in the UK and the impact this could have on dentistry and why this is important in daily practice.

Article

The Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2010 study highlighted that the most prevalent condition in adults was dental caries and the tenth highest among children and deciduous teeth.1 Over the years, numerous expert and consensus reports have confirmed that dental caries and its development are consistently linked to the quantity of sugar consumed,2 with sugar being the most important dietary factor in the development of caries. A systematic review of the evidence of this link was commissioned by the World Health Organization (WHO) and led to the update of their guidelines on sugar consumption: it should be less than 10% of daily energy consumption in order to minimize caries risk.3 Sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) are a significant contributor to excess sugar consumption, which is apparent across all social demographic groups.4 In daily clinical practice the link between sugar intake, caries rate and socio-economic status and the regularly blamed sugar within Western diets is obvious. The possible effect of a sugar levy is relevant to all clinicians. The sugar tax on sugar-sweetened soft drinks was introduced by the UK government in 2018 in a primary drive to reduce obesity and type II diabetes. This was heavily backed by the British Medical Association (BMA), which had been campaigning for the change since 2015.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available