References

Mount GJ, Hume WR, 2nd edn. : Knowledge Books and Software Publishing; 2005
Wilson NHFLondon: Quintessence Publishing; 2007
Banerjee A, Watson TF, 9th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011
Simonsen RJ From prevention to therapy: minimal intervention with sealants and resin restorative materials. J Dent. 2011; 39:27-33
Heidmann J, Hölund U, Poulsen S Changing criteria for restorative treatment of approximal caries over a 10-year period. Caries Res. 1987; 21:460-463
Meyer-Lueckel H, Mueller J, Paris S, Hummel M, Kielbassa AM The penetration of various adhesives into early enamel lesions in vitro. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahmned. 2005; 115:316-323
Office of Fair Trading. Care Homes for Elderly People in the UK. 2005. http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/reports/consumer_protection/oft780.pdf(archived)?
Zanata RL, Navarro MF, Barbosa SH, Lauris JR, Franco EB Clinical evaluation of three restorative materials applied in a minimal intervention caries treatment approach. J Public Health Dent. 2003; 63:221-226
Zanata RL, Magalhaes AC, Lauris JR, Atta MT, Wang L, Navarro MF Microhardness and chemical analysis of high-viscous glass-ionomer cement after 10 years of clinical service as ART restorations. J Dent. 2011; 39:834-840
Lo EC, Luo Y, Tan HP, Dyson JE, Corbet EF ART and conventional root restorations in elders after 12 months. J Dent Res. 2006; 85:929-932
Frencken JE, Van't Hof MA, van Amerongen WE, Holmgren CJ Effectiveness of single-surface ART restorations in the permanent dentition: a meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2004; 83:120-123
Tyas MJ, Anusavice KJ, Frencken JE, Mount GJ Minimal intervention dentistry – a review. Int Dent J. 2000; 50:1-12
Gordan V, Riley III J, Blaser P, Mjör I 2-year clinical evaluation of alternative treatments to replacement of defective amalgam restorations. Op Dent. 2006; 31:418-425
Fernandez EM, Martin JA, Angel PA, Mjör IA, Gordan VV, Moncada GA Survival rate of sealed, refurbished and repaired defective restorations: 4-year follow-up. Braz Dent J. 2011; 22:134-139
Moncada G, Martin J, Fernández E, Hempel MC, Mjör IA, Gordan VV Sealing, refurbishment and repair of Class I and Class II defective restorations: a three-year clinical trial. J Am Dent Assoc. 2009; 140:425-432
Millar B, Robinson P, Davies B Effects of the removal of composite resin restorations on Class II cavities. Br Dent J. 1992; 173:210-212
Sharif M, Merry A, Catleugh M Replacement versus repair of defective restorations in adults: amalgam. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010; 17:(2) https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005970.pub2
Blum I, Jagger D, Wilson N Defective dental restorations: to repair or not to repair? Part 1: Direct composite restorations. Dent Update. 2011; 38:78-84
Blum I, Jagger D, Wilson N Defective dental restorations: to repair or not to repair? Part 2: All-ceramics and porcelain fused to metal systems. Dent Update. 2011; 38:150-158
Diaz-Arnold A, Schneider R, Aquilino S Bond strengths of intraoral porcelain repair materials. J Prosthet Dent. 1989; 61:305-309
Kupiec KA, Wuertz KM, Barkmeier WW, Wilwerding TM Evaluation of porcelain surface treatments and agents for composite-to-porcelain repair. J Prosthet Dent. 1996; 76:119-124
Panah FG, Rezai SMM, Ahmadian L The influence of ceramic surface treatments on the micro-shear bond strength of composite resin to IPS Empress 2. J Prosthodont. 2008; 17:409-414
Armellini D, Von Fraunhofer JA The shortened dental arch: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent. 2004; 92:531-535
WHO Technical Report Series No 826.Geneva: WHO; 1992
Käyser A Shortened dental arches and oral function. J Oral Rehabil. 1981; 8:457-462
Thomason J, Moynihan P, Steen N, Jepson N Time to survival for the restoration of the shortened lower dental arch. J Dent Res. 2007; 86:646-650
Budtz-Jørgensen E, Isidor F A 5-year longitudinal study of cantilevered fixed partial dentures compared with removable partial dentures in a geriatric population. J Prosthet Dent. 1990; 64:42-47
Preshaw P, Walls A, Jakubovics N, Moynihan P, Jepson N, Loewy Z Association of removable partial denture use with oral and systemic health. J Dent. 2011; 39:711-719
Wright PS, Hellyer PH, Beighton D, Heath R, Lynch E Relationship of removable partial denture use to root caries in an older population. Int J Prosthodont. 1992; 5:39-46
Ellis JS, Levine A, Bedos C, Mojon P, Rosberger Z, Feine J Refusal of implant supported mandibular overdentures by elderly patients. Gerodontology. 2011; 28:62-68
Bassi F, Mantecchini G, Carossa S, Preti G Oral conditions and aptitude to receive implants in patients with removable partial dentures: a cross-sectional study. Part I. Oral conditions. J Oral Rehabil. 1996; 23:50-54
Jepson N, Allen F, Moynihan P, Kelly P, Thomason M Patient satisfaction following restoration of shortened mandibular dental arches in a randomized controlled trial. Int J Prosthodont. 2003; 16:409-413
McKenna G, Allen PF, Woods N A preliminary report of the cost-effectiveness of tooth replacement strategies for partially dentate elders. Gerodontology. 2012; https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-2358.2012.00665.x
Tomlinson P, Treasure E Provision of prevention to adults in NHS dental practices and attitudes to prevention. B Dent J. 2006; 200:393-397
Mertz-Fairhurst EJ, Curtis Jr JW, Ergle JW, Rueggeberg FA, Adair SM Ultraconservative and cariostatic sealed restorations: results at year 10. J Am Dent Assoc. 1998; 129:55-66
Martignon S, Ekstrand KR, Gomez J, Lara JS, Cortes A Infiltrating/sealing proximal lesions. A 3 year randomized clinical trial. J Dent Res. 2012; 91:288-292
Kielbassa AM, Muller J, Gernhardt CR Closing the gap between oral hygiene and minimally invasive dentistry: a review on the resin infiltration technique of incipient (proximal) enamel lesions. Quintessence Int. 2009; 40:663-681
Paris S, Meyer-Lueckel H, Kielbassa AM Resin infiltration of natural caries lesions. J Dent Res. 2007; 86:662-666

Minimal intervention dentistry and older patients part 2: minimally invasive operative interventions

From Volume 41, Issue 6, July 2014 | Pages 500-505

Authors

Martina Hayes

BDS, MFDS

Clinical Research Fellow, Restorative Dentistry, University College Cork

Articles by Martina Hayes

Edith Allen

BDS, MFDS, PhD, Dip Con Sed

Lecturer, Department of Restorative Dentistry, University College Cork, University Dental School and Hospital, Wilton, Cork, Republic of Ireland

Articles by Edith Allen

Cristiane da Mata

BDS, MFD, PhD Student

PhD student, University College Cork, Ireland

Articles by Cristiane da Mata

Gerald McKenna

BDS, MFDS FDS(Rest Dent), RCSEd, PgDipTLHE, PhD, FHEA

Dundee Dental Hospital, Park Place, Dundee, UK

Articles by Gerald McKenna

Francis Burke

BDentSc, MSc, PhD, FDS, FFD

Senior Lecturer/Consultant, Restorative Dentistry, University College Cork, Dental School and Hospital, Wilton, Cork, Ireland

Articles by Francis Burke

Abstract

As described in the first paper of this two part series, the expansion of our older population and the concomitant reduction in levels of edentulism will result in an increase in the number of patients presenting in general practice with complex restorative challenges. The application of the concepts of minimal intervention dentistry and minimally invasive operative techniques may offer a powerful armamentarium to the general dentist to provide ethical and conservative treatment to older patients.

Clinical Relevance: When it is unavoidable, operative intervention should be as minimally invasive as practicable in older patients to preserve the longevity of their natural dentition.

Article

Minimal (or minimum) intervention dentistry is the complete holistic team-care approach to patient-centred prevention of disease and management of oral health in the long term. It is centred on managing the ‘dental caries’ process, first ‘controlling and curing’ the disease, and employing minimally invasive techniques when operative intervention is unavoidable. This concept is not a new one, given that the man frequently referred to as the father of operative dentistry, GV Black, stated that ‘The day is surely coming…when we will be engaged in preventive rather than reparative dentistry’ and there are textbooks on the subject listed as recommended reading for undergraduate students and qualified dentists alike.1,2,3 The breakthrough discovery of the acid-etch procedure by Buonocore in the mid 1950s laid the groundwork for the ability for clinical dentistry to adapt to a more conservative, minimally invasive approach to restorative dentistry.4 Despite the presence of MID in the dental literature, the application of this concept seems slow in its integration into general dental practice. There is no doubt that a more restrained approach to placing the first restoration in a tooth surface has a long-term beneficial effect for the longevity of the tooth.5 Unfortunately, many dentists in NHS practice feel inadequately reimbursed for preventive care to adults and this may be affecting the transition from dental surgeon to dental physician.6

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available