References

Petersen PE. The World Oral Health Report 2003: Continuous Improvement of Oral Health in the 21st Century – The Approach of the WHO Global Oral Health Programme. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2003; 32:3-4
Dolan TA, Atchison KA. Implications of access, utilization and need for oral health care by the non-institutionalised and institutionalised elderly on the dental delivery system. J Dent Educ. 1993; 57:876-887
Petersen PE, Yamamoto T. Improving the oral health of older people: the approach of the WHO Global Oral Health Programme. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2005; 33:81-92
In: Fejerskov O, Kidd EAM (eds). Copenhagen, Denmark: Blackwell Monksgaard; 2003
London, England: HMSO, The Stationery Office Ltd; 1998
Elderton RJ. Principles of decision-making to achieve oral health. In: Ulrig U (ed). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1994
Kassab MM, Cohen E. The etiology and prevalence of gingival recession. J Am Dent Assoc. 2003; 134:220-225
Ettinger RL, Qian F. Postprocedural problems in an overdenture population: a longitudinal study. J Endodont. 2004; 30:310-314
NICE guidelines. Dental Recall – Recall interval between routine dental examinations. http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG19/NICEGuidance/doc/English
Ship JA, Pillemer SR, Baum BJ. Xerostomia and the geriatric patient. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002; 50:535-543
Chalmers JM. Minimal Intervention Dentistry: Part 1. Strategies for addressing the new caries challenge in older patients. J Can Dent Assoc. 2006; 72:427-433
Ericson D. The concept of minimally invasive dentistry. Dent Update. 2007; 34:9-18
Frencken JE, van't Hof MA, Taifour D, Al-Zaher I. Effectiveness of ART and traditional amalgam approach in restoring single-surface cavities in posterior teeth of permanent dentitions in school children after 6.3 years. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2007; 35:207-214
Lo ECM, Luo Y, Tan HP, Dyson JE, Corbet EF. ART and conventional root restorations in elders after 12 months. J Dental Res. 2006; 85:929-932
Sharif MO, Fedorowicz Z, Tickle M, Brunton PA. Repair or replacement: do we accept built in obsolescence or do we improve the evidence?. Br Dent J. 2010; 209:171-174

Caries and the older patient

From Volume 38, Issue 6, July 2011 | Pages 376-381

Authors

Cristiane da Mata

BDS, MFD, PhD Student

PhD student, University College Cork, Ireland

Articles by Cristiane da Mata

Gerald McKenna

BDS, MFDS FDS(Rest Dent), RCSEd, PgDipTLHE, PhD, FHEA

Dundee Dental Hospital, Park Place, Dundee, UK

Articles by Gerald McKenna

Francis M Burke

BDentSc, MSc, PhD, FDS, FFD

Articles by Francis M Burke

Abstract

Ageing of the population, together with prolonged retention of teeth, has brought new challenges to dentistry. Whereas in the past oral care for the elderly was restricted to provision of dentures, older patients are now presenting with dental caries and failed restorations. These problems may have an impact on their general health and quality of life. Poor oral hygiene, xerostomia and diet are among the risk factors for caries in older patients and need to be addressed in order to achieve control of the disease. Carious lesions can be treated conservatively in many cases or may need surgical management.

Clinical Relevance: Caries is an oral health issue among older patients and can result in tooth loss. Oral health has a great impact on general health and quality of life of elderly people.

Article

Older patients can present with oral health problems including dental caries. This can affect an individual's general health and quality of life and result in tooth loss.1 Even those patients who did not have a history of dental pathology in the past may develop caries at a later stage in life. Caries can present in the older patient as primary or secondary lesions. Some of the reasons for the development of caries in the elderly are lack of a preventive culture, use of medications that can result in a dry mouth, iatrogenic factors, and cognitive and manual dexterity problems which impair oral hygiene.

Uptake of dental services by elderly patients is generally low. This may be due to reduced mobility, high cost of dental treatment, negative attitudes or fear of dental procedures and lack of perceived need for oral care.2,3 The lack of dental/prevention culture among the elderly could also be explained by the fact that, for many years, public oral health promotion programmes were principally aimed at children and adolescents. Older patients were not included in these programmes as their needs were usually perceived as being restricted to the provision of dentures.

The options to address the management of caries, both therapeutically and surgically, and providing adequate treatment are some of the issues which will be covered in this paper.

Epidemiology

Dental caries is the localized destruction of susceptible dental hard tissues by acidic by-products from bacterial fermentation of dietary carbohydrates. It is a common problem worldwide and it can affect individuals throughout their life.4 Globally, high prevalence rates of coronal dental caries and root surface caries are found among old-age populations.3

The mean number of decayed, missing and filled teeth (DMFT) is a good indicator of the level of dental decay affecting a population. In the 1998 UK Adult Dental Health Survey, the number of edentate older adults (over 65) fell from 79% in 1978 to 46% in 1998.5 The proportion of adults with 18 or more sound and untreated teeth was only 5% among those aged 55 years and over. Dentate adults had an average 1.5 decayed or unsound teeth. Nearly 25% of them had 12 or more teeth with a root surface that was either exposed, worn, filled or decayed and root surface fillings were strongly related to age. These demographic changes and trends in adult oral health suggest a likely significant increase in demand for oral healthcare services.

Types of caries

Caries can present as primary or secondary lesions. Some patients who have not experienced caries in the past may have shifted to a higher caries risk category and may now present with primary caries, especially on root surfaces. Those who have a history of having received dental restorations in the past may present with recurrent or secondary caries.

Primary caries

Primary caries in older adults can present in any tooth surface but it is more commonly seen on cervical areas (Figure 1) and the root surface. Caries can also be seen in susceptible pits and fissures if these have not experienced the disease in the past and therefore have not undergone restoration.

Figure 1. Caries in a medically compromised patient.

Secondary caries

Elderly patients who experienced caries in the past may present with large restorations which may eventually fail. It is known that 60% of restorations placed by practitioners are to replace failed restorations and the most common cause for replacing restorations is secondary caries.6 Hence the importance of applying minimally invasive procedures whenever possible to minimize restoration size.

Root caries

Recession of the gingival margin is a common finding among older patients.7 As the gingival margin recedes, the enamel-cementum junction becomes exposed. This is a very irregular site which can be susceptible to bacterial retention and root caries can develop. Cementum and dentine on the root are less mineralized than enamel and, as such, may be more susceptible to demineralization.

Root caries can present ranging from very small, softened and discoloured areas to extensive, yellow-brown soft or hard areas that may sometimes encircle the whole root surface.

It is important to differentiate between active root caries and arrested lesions. An active lesion is a well-defined, softened area on the root surface that is close to the gingival margin. The lesions are usually covered with plaque. An arrested root surface lesion, on the other hand, appears shiny, hard and is further from the gingival margin.

Both active and inactive lesions can be cavitated. It is important to distinguish between these two entities in order to provide the most appropriate treatment option. Active lesions can become arrested if oral hygiene measures are improved, with associated change in texture. Cavitated lesions must be restored if they represent a site of plaque accumulation which results in difficulty in cleaning (Figures 2 and 3).

Figure 2. Root caries.
Figure 3. Poor oral hygiene and root caries in a patient with poor manual dexterity problems.

Caries on overdenture abutments

Overdenture therapy has become an accepted alternative to extraction of all remaining teeth in older patients. Development of caries in these overdenture abutments is a significant problem and can result in abutment failure. The highest risk of failure can be associated with inadequate oral hygiene and failure to use fluoride consistently.8

Risk assessment

Caries can be prevented irrespective of a patient's age. Determining if a patient is at a high, medium or low risk group for dental caries is essential before proposing any preventive or restorative treatment plan. Low risk patients can be treated with preventive measures, such as oral hygiene instruction, remineralization of lesions and less frequent follow-up appointments. High risk patients, on the other hand, may require surgical intervention and more frequent follow-up. Therefore, the interval between review appointments should be determined individually for each patient and tailored to meet his or her needs. The shortest recall interval recommended for adult patients is three months and the longest is 24 months.9

Some of the factors that should be taken into account in determining risk are:

  • General health;
  • Xerostomia;
  • Diet;
  • Oral hygiene habits/fluoride exposure;
  • Past dental history.
  • General health

    The patient's general health plays a key role in his/her oral health maintenance. An older adult's decreased mobility, manual dexterity and impaired vision can affect his/her ability to follow instructions and perform oral hygiene activities (Figure 3). Motivation to perform these activities may also become limited. It is very important to know and include all these details in the patient's history to be able to propose alternatives.

    A patient with manual dexterity problems, for example, can receive an adapted toothbrush to make oral hygiene easier. In the case of patients who have a carer or helper, it is important to have this person present at the dental appointments and give them all the oral hygiene instructions together with the patient. Motivation is key and the carer needs to be aware of his/her role in ensuring oral hygiene and that preventive methods must become part of the patient's routine.

    Xerostomia

    Saliva is essential for tasting and enjoying food and has a key role on lubrication and protection of soft and hard tissues. Its antibacterial properties maintain the balance of the oral flora. It is also important to keep the mouth relatively clean as it washes away food debris. Therefore, a dry mouth is a risk factor and can result in dental caries.

    Approximately 30% of the population aged 65 or over suffer from dry mouth.10 Drug-induced xerostomia is most common in old age and related to several drugs usually taken by this group of patients, such as tricyclic antidepressants, beta blockers and antihistamines.

    A patient's salivary flow should be assessed through simple questions about self perceived xerostomia (Does your mouth feel dry? How often?) and examination (Does the mirror stick to buccal mucosa? Does the mouth look dry?). The use of saliva substitutes, mouth moisturizers and sugar-free chewing gums can then be suggested.

    Diet

    A high-sugar-content diet can result in tooth decay. Older patients might be on a more cariogenic diet or taking medications which contain great amounts of sugar. Assessing type and frequency of food intake is important, although proposing changes to older individuals can be quite challenging. It is essential to know if the diet represents a risk in order to plan the most appropriate treatment and preventive strategy.

    Oral hygiene habits/fluoride exposure

    Frequent toothbrushing with the use of fluoride-containing toothpastes is of great importance to avoid initiation of the caries lesion and also to promote remineralization of affected enamel, dentine or cementum.

    The older adults of today come from an era when the knowledge about the caries process was scarce and oral health promotion programmes non-existent. Hence, some of them might not know how to brush their teeth properly or use the incorrect products to do so.

    Past dental history

    Patients who have a high number of filled and missing teeth, who live in non-fluoridated areas, partial denture wearers and who are not regular dental attendees can also be considered at a higher risk for dental caries. The past disease experience will also give an indication of caries risk.

    Management of carious lesions

    Caries prevention

    Evidence suggests the management of dental caries needs to move to less invasive approaches (Table 1). All effort must be made to prevent the disease from occurring and patients have to be educated in that direction. Older patients have not benefited from oral health programmes in the past and clinical studies suggest that oral health education for these patients can be effective.3


    Fluoride High fluoride content toothpaste (5,000 ppm), 2 times daily. Fluoride varnish – several times annually as patient attendance permits
    Chlorhexidine gluconate 0.12% – once daily for 4 weeks and review
    CPP-ACP Recaldent, MI paste/Trident white with Recaldent, use paste or gum several times daily
    Xerostomia Change medications to classes that are less anti-cholinergic and lead to less fluid retentionIncrease water intakeAvoid dental products with additives (eg sodium lauryl sulphate) or alcoholUse of saliva substitutes and oral lubricants (Oral Balance Gel, Biotene range, MI paste)Use of saliva stimulants such as sugar-free gumsProfessional prophylaxis

    If a caries lesion is present, treatment will depend on the stage of the disease. In non-cavitated lesions, the oral environment may be altered to allow remineralization. This approach includes decreasing the frequency of refined carbohydrate intake, improving plaque control, ensuring optimum salivary flow and conducting patient education. Topical fluorides can be used to encourage remineralization.

    In cavitated lesions, a surgical approach is indicated but should be minimally invasive. Infected tissue should be removed and replaced with an appropriate filling material.

    Before any surgical intervention is undertaken, it is fundamental to establish a plan for disease control. This will involve moving patients from high to low risk status and promoting remineralization of early lesions. Any changes in oral hygiene technique, frequency of food intake, use of topical fluoride or saliva substitutes should be discussed and suggested at this stage.

    Surgical intervention

    Conventional restorations

    Adhesive restorative materials and techniques result in less removal of healthy tissue.12 Composite resins may be indicated when aesthetics and strength are important. In situations where field control is not adequate, glass ionomer cement can be used more successfully. A conventional or resin-modified glass ionomer can be used to restore root caries.

    Glass ionomer cement

    As with composite resin, adequate isolation, use of matrices and strips is recommended to ensure optimum placement of glass ionomer cements. After caries removal, the cavity should be conditioned for 10 seconds using 10% polyacrylic acid to remove the smear layer and, after washing the cavity, it is important not to over-dry it. After the glass ionomer cement is mixed and placed into the cavity, a barrier should be used to avoid water exchange. Petroleum jelly or a light-activated resin enamel bond can be used for that purpose. Conventional glass ionomer cement should not be polished for at least 24 hours after the restoration is placed, whereas resin-modified glass ionomer cement can be finished immediately.

    Minimally invasive techniques

    Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART)

    ART involves the use of hand instruments only to remove caries and an adhesive material such as glass ionomer cement to restore the tooth. Only the very soft, infected dentine is removed and the cavity is sealed, which will allow remineralization. This is a technique which does not require the use of anaesthesia or rotary instruments. It has been used in children with success and studies show survival rates comparable to conventional techniques.13 ART can be very useful in treating older patients, especially those who have restricted mobility, who require domiciliary care or who have a dental phobia. It can also be a response to the challenge of restoring root lesions (Figures 4 and 5). High survival rates of ART to treat root caries have been reported in the literature.14

    Figure 4. Patient after prophylaxis and ART filling on UR6 and UL3.
    Figure 5. Root caries lesions restored using ART.

    The technique entails:

  • Isolation of the tooth with cotton rolls;
  • Cleaning of the tooth surface with a moist cotton pellet;
  • If necessary, widening of the cavity entrance with the enamel hatchet;
  • Removal of soft carious tissue with hand instruments (eg spoon excavators);
  • Conditioning of the cavity with 10% polyacrylic acid for 10 seconds using cotton pellets and drying of tooth surface with dry cotton pellets;
  • Mixing of the glass ionomer cement (powder and liquid components), according to manufacturer's instructions on a glass slab;
  • Insertion of the glass ionomer cement into the cavity with an insertion spatula;
  • Protection of the restoration with petroleum jelly;
  • Check occlusion;
  • Re-application of petroleum jelly;
  • Repair of defective restorations

    When treating secondary caries, whenever it is possible, it is more conservative to repair rather than replace the restoration (Figures 6 and 7). The replacement of amalgam and composite restorations result in loss of tooth structure and larger restorations, which will have shorter life spans than their predecessors.6 Some studies suggest that repair of restorations may prove to be as effective as replacement but evidence is still weak and incomplete.15 Thus, the decision of repairing a restoration must be based on a patient's risk for caries, professional judgement of benefits versus risks and minimally invasive principles of cavity preparation. Long-term success of the repair will depend on the patient shifting to a low risk status. It is important to keep in mind, though, that a decision of ‘no treatment’ rather than ‘replacement’ of a restoration is more likely to be correct in a low risk population.

    Figure 6. Radiograph showing caries on mesial margin of crown UL3.

    Adhesive repair of mesial margin of crown UL3.

    Conclusion

    The number of older patients requiring dental treatment because of caries is increasing. These patients can be treated quite effectively and, in many cases, conservatively. Knowledge of the caries process, the different caries risk factors, as well as the different restorative techniques available, are key to address the problem with a view to prevention, minimal intervention and appropriate surgical management for each individual case.