References

Samaranayake L., 5th edn. London: Elsevier; 2018
US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2020;
Li DTS, Samaranayake LP, Leung MYY, Neelakantan P. Facial protection in the era of COVID-19: a narrative review. Oral Dis. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1111/odi.13460
Respirator Trusted-Source Information: Ancillary Respirator Information. US National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. 2018;
MacIntyre CR, Wang Q, Seale H A randomized clinical trial of three options for N95 respirators and medical masks in health workers. Am J Respir Crit CareMed. 2013; 187:960-966
Loeb M, Dafoe N, Mahony J Surgical mask vs N95 respirator for preventing influenza among health care workers: a randomized trial. J Am Med Assoc. 2009; 302:(17)1865-1871
Radonovich LJ, Simberkoff MS, Bessesen MT N95 respirators vs medical masks for preventing influenza among health care personnel: a randomized clinical trial. J Am Med Assoc. 2019; 322:824-833
Smith D, MacDougall CC, Johnstone J, Copes RA, Schwartz B, Garber GE. Effectiveness of N95 respirators versus surgical masks in protecting health care workers from acute respiratory infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can Med Assoc J. 2016; 188:567-574
Indemnity. British Dental Association. 2020. https://bda.org/advice/Pages/indemnity.aspx (Accessed 11 July 2020)
US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2019;
American Dental Association. 2020;
Perencevich EN. Personal protective equipment into the community: face shields and containment of COVID-19. J Am Med Assoc. 2020; 323:(22)2252-2253
US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Considerations for Optimizing the Supply of Powered Air-Purifying Respirators (PAPRs). 2020;
Medical Adhesive-Related Skin Injuries (MARSI): Made Easy. Wounds UK. https://www.wounds-uk.com/resources/details/medical-adhesive-related-skin-injuries-marsi-made-easy (Accessed 10 July 2020)

COVID-19: unmasking the facial protection paradigms

From Volume 47, Issue 8, September 2020 | Pages 644-650

Authors

Lakshman Samaranayake

DSc, DDS, FRCPath, FHKCPath, FDS RCS(Edin), FRACDS, FDS RCPS

Professor Emeritus, and Immediate-past Dean, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Hong Kong

Articles by Lakshman Samaranayake

Email Lakshman Samaranayake

Dion Tik Shun Li

Clinical Assistant Professor in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Articles by Dion Tik Shun Li

Abstract

A number of facial protection measures to mitigate the spread of COVID-19 is available to clinicians. Here, we comprehensively explore the pros and cons of different types of face masks including N95 respirators, face shields, and powered, filtering-facepiece respirators (FFRs) currently used to reduce airborne infection transmission in the dental clinic. The controversial issue of the `fit test` prior to the use of N95 masks, and the related, current, UK and US recommendations are additionally discussed. The article concludes with a section on facial skin health, and practical measures for circumventing the adverse skin effects due to prolonged mask wearing.

CPD/Clinical Relevance: Post-COVID-19, ‘new normal’ entails significant re-adaptations of infection control in dentistry, including facial protection measures that are required for mitigating airborne infection transmission in the dental operatory. A strategic understanding of the theory and practice of facial protective measures, and the underlying technology of the various face masks and respirators available for dentistry, will be valuable for safeguarding the health of patients as well as the whole dental team.

Article

Healthcare workers (HCWs) are the frontline combatants in the current battle against the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Personal protective equipment (PPE), including face masks, remains as their most trusted and pivotal ally in this conflict, fought on many fronts against an unseen enemy that mainly manifests in the form of an airborne pathogen. Surgical mask wearing was hitherto considered to provide adequate universal protection against such pathogens in the dental operatory, and yet the advent of the readily transmissible SARS-CoV-2 has led to a re-examination of the classical facial protection paradigms in dentistry. Consequently, the profession is now confronted with new guidelines, and an array of novel respiratory protective equipment (RPE), such as N95 masks, and powered air-purifying respirators (PAPRs), that were not routinely used for facial protection. Here we review the current guidelines regulating RPE use and their management in dental practice.

The practice of dentistry is rather unique in that the patient cannot be masked during any dental procedure, and the dentist is in extremely close proximity to the oral operative site, which renders both the operator and the assistant highly vulnerable to airborne infection.1 Even though the rubber dam insertion might provide some degree of protection against aerosolizing oral fluids, many obligatory emergency procedures, such as surgical removal of teeth and drainage of intra-oral abscesses, preclude the use of such a barrier. Moreover, many dental procedures require the use of a handpiece with irrigant coolants, which generate significant virus-infested aerosols that may remain suspended in the air for prolonged periods. Due to these reasons, a high level of facial protection is required in dentistry, such as surgical masks and filtering-facepiece respirators (FFRs), in addition to eye protection, head caps, disposable gowns, shoe covers, and meticulous disinfection of all surfaces between patients, particularly if aerosol generating procedures (AGPs) are performed.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available