References

Health and Social Care Information Centre. Children's Dental Health Survey Executive Summary England, Wales and Northern Ireland, 2013 (Internet). 2015. https://digital.nhs.uk/catalogue/PUB17137 (Accessed cited 27 January 18)
Prendergast MJ, Beal JF, Williams SA. The relationship between deprivation, ethnicity and dental health in 5-year-old children in Leeds, UK. Community Dent Health. 1997; 14:18-21
Public Health England. Oral Health Survey of Five-year-old Children 2017. A report on the inequalities found in prevalence and severity of dental decay. 2018. http://www.nwph.net/dentalhealth/201617Survey5yearoldchildren/NDEP%20for%20England%20OH%20Survey%205yr%202017%20Report%20Gateway%20Approved%20v2.pdf (Accessed 27 January 18)
BaniHani A, Deery C, Toumba J, Munyombwe T, Duggal M. The impact of dental caries and its treatment by conventional or biological approaches on the oral health-related quality of life of children and carers. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2018; 28:266-276
Knapp R, Marshman Z, Rodd HD. Treatment of dental caries under general anaesthetic in children. BDJ Team. 2017; 4
Wenzel A. Radiographic display of carious lesions and cavitation in proximal surfaces: advantages and drawbacks of conventional and advanced modalities. Acta Odontol Scand. 2014; 72:251-264
Duggal MS, Nooh A, High A. Response of the primary pulp to inflammation: a review of the Leeds studies and challenges for the future. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2002; 3:111-114
Kidd EA, Pitts NB. A reappraisal of the value of the bitewing radiograph in the diagnosis of posterior proximal caries. Br Dent J. 1990; 169:195-200
Bloemendal E, de Vet HC, Bouter LM. The value of bitewing radiographs in epidemiological caries research: a systematic review of the literature. J Dent. 2004; 32:255-264
Newman B, Seow WK, Kazoullis S, Ford D, Holcombe T. Clinical detection of caries in the primary dentition with and without bitewing radiography. Aust Dent J. 2009; 54:23-30
Taylor GK, Macpherson LM. An investigation into the use of bitewing radiography in children in Greater Glasgow. Br Dent J. 2004; 196:563-568
Weerheijm KL, Gruythuysen RJ, van Amerongen WE. Prevalence of hidden caries. ASDC J Dent Child. 1992; 59:408-412
Weerheijm KL, Groen HJ, Bast AJ, Kieft JA, Eijkman MA, van Amerongen WE. Clinically undetected occlusal dentine caries: a radiographic comparison. Caries Res. 1992; 26:305-309
Machiulskiene V, Nyvad B, Baelum V. A comparison of clinical and radiographic caries diagnoses in posterior teeth of 12-year-old Lithuanian children. Caries Res. 1999; 33:340-348
Diniz MB, Boldieri T, Rodrigues JA, Santos-Pinto L, Lussi A, Cordeiro RC. The performance of conventional and fluorescence-based methods for occlusal caries detection: an in vivo study with histologic validation. J Am Dent Assoc. 2012; 143:339-350
Braga MM, Ekstrand KR, Martignon S, Imparato JC, Ricketts DN, Mendes FM. Clinical performance of two visual scoring systems in detecting and assessing activity status of occlusal caries in primary teeth. Caries Res. 2010; 44:300-308 https://doi.org/10.1159/000315616
Ekstrand KR, Ricketts DNJ, Kidd EAM. Occlusal caries: pathology, diagnosis and logical management. Dent Update. 2001; 28:380-387
Pontes LRA, Novaes TF, Lara JS Impact of the radiographic method on treatment decisions related to dental caries in primary molars: a before-after study. Clin Oral Investig. 2019; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-02844-w
Twetman S, Fontana M. Patient caries risk assessment. Monogr Oral Sci. 2009; 21:91-101
Mejàre I, Axelsson S, Dahlén G, Espelid I, Norlund A, Tranæus S, Twetman S. Caries risk assessment. A systematic review. Acta Odontol Scand. 2014; 72:81-91 https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2013.822548
Pitts N, Melo P, Martignon S, Ekstrand K, Ismail A. Caries risk assessment, diagnosis and synthesis in the context of a European Core Curriculum in Cariology. Eur J Dent Educ. 2011; 15:23-31
Public Health England. Delivering better oral health: an evidence–based toolkit for prevention. 2017. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/605266/Delivering_better_oral_health.pdf
, 2nd edn. In: Pendlebury ME, Horner K, Eaton KA (eds). London: Faculty of General Dental Practitioners (UK); 2004
Espelid I, Mejàre I, Weerheijm K EAPD guidelines for use of radiographs in children. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2003; 4:40-48
Mauthe PW, Eaton KA. An investigation into the bitewing radiographic prescribing patterns of West Kent general dental practitioners. Prim Dent Care. 2011; 18:107-114
Davies KJ, Drage NA. Adherence to NICE guidelines on recall intervals and the FGDP(UK) Selection Criteria for Dental Radiography. Prim Dent J. 2013; 2:50-56
Validity and acceptability of a laser fluorescence device compared to conventional methods for detection of proximal caries in primary teeth. 2015. http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/9481
Potter BJ, Shrout MK, Harrell JC. Reproducibility of beam alignment using different bite-wing radiographic techniques. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1995; 79:532-535
Benn DK, Watson TF. Correlation between film position, bite-wing shadows, clinical pitfalls, and the histologic size of proximal lesions. Quintessence Int. 1989; 20:131-141
Chadwick BL, Dummer PM, van der Stelt PF. The effect of alterations in horizontal X-ray beam angulation and bucco-lingual cavity width on the radiographic depth of proximal cavities. J Oral Rehabil. 1999; 26:292-301
European Commission. Radiation Protection 172. Evidence Based Guidelines on Cone Beam CT for Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology. 2012. http://ec.europa.eu/energy/nuclear/radiation_protection/doc/publication/172.pdf (Accessed 31 July, 2014)
Wall BF, Haylock R, Jansen JTM, Hillier MC, Hart D, Shrimpton PC. Radiation risks from medical X-ray examinations as a function of the age and sex of the patient.Chilton: HPA; 2011
Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, White SC. Patient risk related to common dental radiographic examinations: the impact of 2007 International Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations regarding dose calculation. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008; 139:1237-1243
Alkurt MT, Peker I, Bala O, Altunkaynak B. In vitro comparison of four different dental X-ray films and direct digital radiography for proximal caries detection. Oper Dent. 2007; 32:504-509
Health Protection Agency. Trends in dental radiography equipment and patient dose in the UK and Republic of Ireland (HPA-CRCE-043). 2013. http://www.phe-protectionservices.org.uk/cms/assets/gfx/content/resource_3320cs36ed197b3f.pdf (Accessed 20 January 2019)
Versteeg CH, Sanderink GC, van Ginkel FC, van der Stelt PF. An evaluation of periapical radiography with a charge-coupled device. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1998; 27:97-101
Bahrami G, Hagstrøm C, Wenzel A. Bitewing examination with four digital receptors. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2003; 32:317-321
Møystad A, Svanaes DB, Risnes S, Larheim TA, Gröndahl HG. Detection of proximal caries with a storage phosphor system. A comparison of enhanced digital images with dental X-ray film. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1996; 25:202-206
Wenzel A, Fejerskov O. Validity of diagnosis of questionable caries lesions in occlusal surfaces of extracted third molars. Caries Res. 1992; 26:188-194
Eduarda HLN, Gaêta-Araujo H, Vasconcelos KF Influence of brightness and contrast adjustments on the diagnosis of proximal caries lesions. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2018; 47
Abreu M, Mol A, Ludlow JB. Performance of RVGui sensor and Kodak Ektaspeed Plus film for proximal caries detection. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001; 91:381-385
Pontual AA, de Melo DP, de Almeida SM, Bóscolo FN, Haiter Neto F. Comparison of digital systems and conventional dental film for the detection of proximal enamel caries. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010; 39:431-436
Ulusu T, Bodur H, Odabaş ME. In vitro comparison of digital and conventional bitewing radiographs for the detection of proximal caries in primary teeth exposed and viewed by a new wireless handheld unit. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010; 39:91-94
Haak R, Wicht MJ, Noack MJ. Conventional, digital and contrast-enhanced bitewing radiographs in the decision to restore proximal carious lesions. Caries Res. 2001; 35:193-199
Khan EA, Tyndall DA, Ludlow JB, Caplan D. Proximal caries detection: Sirona Sidexis versus Kodak Ektaspeed Plus. Gen Dent. 2005; 53:43-48
Pitts NB, Renson CE. Image analysis of bitewing radiographs: a histologically validated comparison with visual assessments of radiolucency depth in enamel. Br Dent J. 1986; 160:205-209
Wenzel A. Computer-automated caries detection in digital bitewings: consistency of a program and its influence on observer agreement. Caries Res. 2001; 35:12-20
Tracy KD, Dykstra BA, Gakenheimer DC, Scheetz JP, Lacina S, Scarfe WC, Farman AG. Utility and effectiveness of computer-aided diagnosis of dental caries. Gen Dent. 2011; 59:136-144

Bitewing Radiography for Caries Diagnosis in Children: When and Why?

From Volume 47, Issue 4, April 2020 | Pages 334-341

Authors

Laura Timms

BDS, MFDS (RCS Eng), PGCert DPH, MSc Clinical Research, MPaed Dent (RCS Eng)

Paediatric Dentistry, Charles Clifford Dental Hospital, Wellesley Road, Sheffield S10 2SZ

Articles by Laura Timms

Chris Deery

BDS, MSc, FDS RCS Ed, PhD, FDS (Paed Dent), RCS Ed, FDS RCS Eng, FHEA

Professor/Honorary Consultant in Paediatric Dentistry, School of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield

Articles by Chris Deery

Barbara Chadwick

BDS, MScD, PhD, FDS RCS(Edin)

Cardiff University

Articles by Barbara Chadwick

Nicholas Drage

BDS, FDS RCS(Eng), FDS RCPS(Glas), DDR RCR

Consultant Maxillofacial Radiologist, Cardiff University, School of Dentistry, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XY

Articles by Nicholas Drage

Abstract

Untreated dental caries affects children in the UK, with significant burden to the child, family and health service. High quality bitewing radiography is more effective than clinical observation alone at detecting proximal caries in children. Accurate diagnosis before cavitation allows preventive rather than operative management. Research has demonstrated that most children find bitewing radiography acceptable. It is therefore vital that bitewing radiographs of children are taken as per national guidance in general practice.

CPD/Clinical Relevance: Timely and high quality bitewing radiography is required for accurate diagnosis and treatment planning in children.

Article

The 2013 Children's Dental Health Survey found that 31% of 5-year-olds had obvious caries in the primary dentition.1 The average number of decayed teeth was 0.9 but for those with caries it was 3.0.1 Thirteen per cent of 5-year-olds suffer from severe and extensive decay, and 54% of 8-year-olds had a mean of 1.1 primary teeth affected by untreated caries into dentine, with 28% of 5-year-olds and 38% of 8-year-olds having decay into dentine.1,2 The Care Index indicates that the proportion of carious teeth that are restored was 11.8% in England for 5-year-olds in 2016–2017, meaning only around 1 in 8 carious primary teeth were treated.3

Caries is a burden for patients, affecting confidence, sleeping and eating.4 When not treated, severe decay can lead to pain and sepsis, and treatment under general anaesthetic with associated morbidity and mortality risks. It is also a significant public health problem. In 2015/2016 there were 43,700 hospital admissions of children under 16 with a primary diagnosis of dental caries, mostly requiring extractions.5 Detection of caries before cavitation allows use of preventive measures, such as oral hygiene instruction, dietary advice and fluoride use to arrest lesions. In both primary and permanent teeth, between 33% and 100% of caries lesions in the outer dentine are cavitated, and the deeper the lesion has penetrated dentine, the more likely it is to have cavitated.6 If cavitation exists, the efficiency of preventive treatment is reduced, as removal of bacteria from the cavity is difficult. In consequence, more invasive treatment requiring local or general anaesthesia may be necessary. Further, in primary molars with proximal caries, teeth are often pulpally involved at an early stage, therefore early diagnosis to allow restoration to avoid infection is necessary.7

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available