References

Daudt Polido W, Aghaloo T, Emmett TW Number of implants placed for complete-arch fixed prostheses: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2018; 29:154-183
Weintraub JA, Orleans B, Fontana M Factors associated with becoming edentulous in the US Health and Retirement Study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019; 67:2318-2324
Kailembo A, Preet R, Stewart Williams J. Common risk factors and edentulism in adults, aged 50 years and over, in China, Ghana, India and South Africa: results from the WHO Study on global AGEing and adult health (SAGE). BMC Oral Health. 2016; 17 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-016-0256-2
Kassebaum NJ, Smith AGC, Bernabé E Global, regional, and national prevalence, incidence, and disability-adjusted life years for oral conditions for 195 countries, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the global burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors. J Dent Res. 2017; 96:380-387
12. All on four – a review. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2018; 18:S78-S79 https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-4052.246682
Bhering CLB, Mesquita MF, Kemmoku DT Comparison between all-on-four and all-on-six treatment concepts and framework material on stress distribution in atrophic maxilla: a prototyping guided 3D-FEA study. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016; 69:715-725
Horita S, Sugiura T, Yamamoto K Biomechanical analysis of immediately loaded implants according to the ‘All-on-Four’ concept. J Prosthodont Res. 2017; 61:123-132
Sailer I, Strasding M, Valente NA A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of zirconia-ceramic and metal–ceramic multiple-unit fixed dental prostheses. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2018; 29:184-198
Sailer I, Balmer M, Hüsler J Comparison of fixed dental prostheses with zirconia and metal frameworks: five-year results of a randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Prosthodont. 2017; 30:426-428
Mangano C, Iaculli F, Piattelli A Fixed restorations supported by Morse-taper connection implants: a retrospective clinical study with 10–20 years of follow-up. Clin Oral Implant Res. 2015; 26:1229-1236
Papaspyridakos P, Barizan Bordin T, Kim Y-J Implant survival rates and biologic complications with implant-supported fixed complete dental prostheses: a retrospective study with up to 12-year follow-up. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018; 29:881-893
Ali K, Kay EJ. What are the long-term survival and complication rates of complete-arch fixed implant rehabilitation in edentulous patients?. Evid Based Dent. 2019; 20:97-98
Tribst JPM, Dal Piva AM de O, Borges ALS Does the prosthesis weight matter? 3D finite element analysis of a fixed implant-supported prosthesis at different weights and implant numbers. J Adv Prosthodont. 2020; 12:67-74
Joda T, Zarone F, Ferrari M. The complete digital workflow in fixed prosthodontics: a systematic review. BMC Oral Health. 2017; 17
Pjetursson BE, Valente NA, Strasding M A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic single crowns. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2018; 29:199-214
Sailer I, Strasding M, Valente NA A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic multiple-unit fixed dental prostheses. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2018; 29:184-198
Fehmer V, Mühlemann S, Hämmerle CH, Sailer I. Criteria for the selection of restoration materials. Quintessence Int. 2014; 45:723-730 https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.a32509
Ali Z, Eliyas S, Vere JW. Choosing the right dental material and making sense of the options: evidence and clinical recommendations. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2015; 23:150-162
Schnabl D. Prosthetic rehabilitation of partially edentulous patients: fixed – removable – combined? Metal–ceramics – all-ceramics? Implants? Anything goes! Part 2: two case studies represent the fixed, respectively the combined fixed-removable prosthetic restoration by utilization of implants. Swiss Dent J. 2015; 125:155-161
Pihlaja J, Näpänkangas R, Raustia A. Early complications and short-term failures of zirconia single crowns and partial fixed dental prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 112:778-783
Larsson C, von Steyern PV. Ten-year follow-up of implant-supported all-ceramic fixed dental prostheses: a randomized, prospective clinical trial. Int J Prosthodont. 2016; 29:31-34
Poggio CE, Ercoli C, Rispoli L Metal-free materials for fixed prosthodontic restorations. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017; 12 https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009606.pub2

Metal–Ceramic implant-supported fixed dental prostheses: the gold standard for the completely edentulous patient. A case report

From Volume 49, Issue 7, July 2022 | Pages 596-599

Authors

Adel Martínez Martínez

Professor, Gitouc Investigation Group, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Cartagena, Cartagena, Colombia

Articles by Adel Martínez Martínez

María del Pilar Lujan-Pardo

Professor, Faculty of Dentistry, Rafael Nuñez University, Cartagena, Colombia

Articles by María del Pilar Lujan-Pardo

Stephanye Ariza-Martínez

Professor, Gitouc Investigation Group, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Cartagena, Cartagena, Oral Rehabilitation Department. Cartagena, Colombia

Articles by Stephanye Ariza-Martínez

Abstract

The development of implantology has allowed implant-supported fixed prosthetic treatments in edentulous patients to become the main alternative to conventional rehabilitation. The dental experience of edentate patients comprises an extensive history of successes and failures with traditional rehabilitation. The following report describes a case of a completely edentulous patient who recovered oral function and aesthetics by placing six implants in each jaw and, subsequently, restoration with metal–ceramic implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs). The authors explore the criteria that must be considered for the selection of the material to be used in implant-supported fixed prostheses.

CPD/Clinical Relevance: To ensure enhanced survival rates for implant-supported fixed prosthetic restorations in edentulous patients, patient factors, their expectations, the number of implants to be placed and the materials to be used must be carefully considered.

Article

Edentulousness can be partial or complete.1 For dentists, this is one of the most complex situations to address owing to its multifactorial aetiology and the impact it has on systemic and emotional health, as well as the functional and aesthetic compromise it represents. Different factors have been linked to the premature tooth loss that has lead to the partial or complete edentulism. Among them are low educational level, smoking, diabetes, poor general health of the individual, physical limitations or disabilities, and few or no visits to the dentist.2 Since oral health is essential for general health, function and wellbeing, and considering that, worldwide, oral health has not shown improvements in the last 25 years3,4 it is necessary to provide alternatives for edentulous patients that allow them to restore function, aesthetics and self-esteem.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available