References

McCarthy CE, Field JK, Rajlawat BP Trends and regional variation in the incidence of head and neck cancers in England: 2002 to 2011. Int J Oncol. 2015; 47:204-210 https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2015.2990
Anderson G, Ebadi M, Vo K An updated review on head and neck cancer treatment with radiation therapy. Cancers (Basel). 2021; 13 https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13194912
Marunick MT, Harrison R, Beumer J Prosthodontic rehabilitation of midfacial defects. J Prosthet Dent. 1985; 54:553-560 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(85)90433-0
Banerjee S, Kumar S, Bera A Magnet retained intraoral-extra oral combination prosthesis: a case report. J Adv Prosthodont. 2012; 4:235-258 https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2012.4.4.235
Cordeiro PG, Santamaria E A classification system and algorithm for reconstruction of maxillectomy and midfacial defects. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000; 105:2331-2346 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200006000-00004
Brignoni R, Dominici JT An intraoral-extraoral combination prosthesis using an intermediate framework and magnets: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2001; 85:7-11 https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.113030
Guttal SS, Patil NP, Shetye AD Prosthetic rehabilitation of a midfacial defect resulting from lethal midline granuloma – a clinical report. J Oral Rehabil. 2006; 33:863-867 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01616.x
Cowan PW An obturator prosthesis. Quintessence Int. 1985; 16:403-405
Patil PG, Patil SP Fabrication of a hollow obturator as a single unit for management of bilateral subtotal maxillectomy. J Prosthodont. 2012; 21:194-199 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00799.x
Sharma AB, Beumer J Reconstruction of maxillary defects: the case for prosthetic rehabilitation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005; 63:1770-1773 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2005.08.013
Somay E, Yilmaz B, Topkan E Radiotherapy and dental implant applications in patients with head and neck cancer. In: Sergi CM Brisbane, Australia: Exon Publications; 2023
Engelen M, van Heumen CC, Merkx MA, Meijer GJ Intraoral-extraoral combination prosthesis: improving retention using interconnecting magnets. Int J Prosthodont. 2014; 27:279-282 https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.3849
Menneking H, Klein M, Hell B, Bier J Prosthetic restoration of nasal defects: Indications for two different osseo-integrated implant systems. J Facial Somato Prosthet. 1998; 4:29-33
Thomas KLondon: Quintessence Publishing; 1994
Worthington P, Bränemark PI Advanced Osseo-integration Surgery Applications in the Maxillofacial Region.Il, USA: Quintessence; 1992
Sykes LM, Essop RM Combination intraoral and extraoral prosthesis used for rehabilitation of a patient treated for cancrum oris: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2000; 83:613-616
Hatami M, Badrian H, Samanipoor S, Goiato MC Magnet-retained facial prosthesis combined with maxillary obturator. Case Rep Dent. 2013; 2013 https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/406410
Dostalova T, Kozak J, Hubacek M Facial prosthesis. 2011. In: Turkyilmaz I London: IntechOpen; 2011
Arcuri MR, LaVelle WE, Fyler E, Jons R Prosthetic complications of extraoral implants. J Prosthet Dent. 1993; 69:289-292 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(93)90108-z
Roumanas E, Nishumura R, Beumer J Osseo-integrated implants: six-year follow-up report on the success rates of craniofacial implants at UCLA. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1994; 9:579-585
Butterworth C, McCaul L, Barclay C Restorative dentistry and oral rehabilitation: United Kingdom National Multidisciplinary Guidelines. J Laryngol Otol. 2016; 130:(S2)S41-S44 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215116000414
Drago CJ Tarnish and corrosion with the use of intraoral magnets. J Prosthet Dent. 1991; 66:536-540
Patil PG Modified technique to fabricate a hollow light-weight facial prosthesis for lateral midfacial defect: a clinical report. J Adv Prosthodont. 2010; 2:65-70 https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2010.2.3.65

The rehabilitation of a combined mid-facial defect using a magnetretained intra- and extra-oral prosthesis: a case report

From Volume 51, Issue 7, July 2024 | Pages 496-500

Authors

Hollie Hawrot

BDS (hons)

Chief Dental Officer Clinical Fellow, NHS England.

Articles by Hollie Hawrot

Email Hollie Hawrot

Rachael Y Jablonski

BDS MFDS RCSEd, BDS, MFDS RCSEd

Academic Clinical Fellow and Specialty Registrar in Restorative Dentistry, Leeds Dental Institute

Articles by Rachael Y Jablonski

Email Rachael Y Jablonski

Zaid Ali

BChD, MFDS RCS(Ed), PhD, MSc, PGDip, PGCert, BChD, FDS (Rest Dent), RCSEd, PhD, MSc, MFDS RCSEd, PGDip

PGCert Health Research (Leeds), Associate Dentist, Lindley Dental, Huddersfield

Articles by Zaid Ali

Abstract

There are several treatment options available to restore function and appearance in patients with combined mid-facial defects. Owing to the size of the defect and the associated size and weight of the prostheses, adequate retention can be challenging to achieve. Retention of a facial prosthesis can be improved using several techniques, such as medical grade adhesives, attachments, or osseo-integrated implants. For patients with a history of radiotherapy, surgical rehabilitation may be less favourable than non-surgical approaches owing to the risk of osteoradionecrosis and a reduced blood supply in the surgical fields. This clinical case report highlights the conservative rehabilitation of a combined mid-facial defect using a magnet-retained intra-oral and extra-oral prosthesis.

CPD/Clinical Relevance:

A thorough medical and clinical assessment will highlight factors that will influence the treatment planning process when managing a combined mid-facial defect.

Article

Malignant tumours that arise from the paranasal sinuses, salivary glands and upper aerodigestive tract are classified as head and neck cancers (HNC).1,2 In 2008, there were over 500,000 cases of HNC worldwide, of which, around 6000 of these cases occurred in the United Kingdom.2 Current data show an upward trend in HNC and, as the eighth most common type of cancer currently in the UK, the treatment and rehabilitation of HNC will become more common practice.3 The primary treatment modalities for HNC are surgery, radiotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, or a combination treatment.4 In cases where surgical intervention is required and the tumour resection is large, a mid-facial defect may be a consequence.4

Mid-facial defects are classified as defects that are confined to the middle third of the face in the horizontal plane and communicate with intra-oral maxillary defects.5 Inevitable consequences of mid-facial defects include functional difficulty and significant disfigurement.6 Some confusion exists over the classification of mid-facial defects owing to the presence of multiple classification systems and the amalgamation of mid-facial defects with maxillectomy defects. Furthermore, a standardized approach to apply to the reconstruction of mid-facial defects is lacking.7 However, local classifications do exist, such as the classification made by the Memorial Sloan–Kettering Cancer Center, which describes four broad types of facial defects based upon the extent of resection of the maxillary walls, palate, and orbital contents.7

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available