Chen J, Cai M, Yang J Immediate versus early or conventional loading dental implants with fixed prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials. J Prosthet Dent. 2019; 122:516-536 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.05.013
Barfeie A, Wilson J, Rees J Implant surface characteristics and their effect on osseo-integration. Br Dent J. 2015; 218 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.171
Jensen OT, 3rd edn. : Quintenessence; 2019
Dimitroulis G, Gupta B, Wilson I, Hart C The atrophic edentulous alveolus. A preliminary study on a new generation of subperiosteal implants. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023; 27:69-78 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-022-01044-3
Chavda S, Levin L Human studies of vertical and horizontal alveolar ridge augmentation comparing different types of bone graft materials: a systematic review. J Oral Implantol. 2018; 44:74-84 https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-17-00053
Thoma DS, Naenni N, Figuero E Effects of soft tissue augmentation procedures on peri-implant health or disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018; 29:(Suppl 15)32-49 https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13114
Probst FA, Schweiger J, Stumbaum MJ Magnetic resonance imaging based computer-guided dental implant surgery; a clinical pilot study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020; 22:612-621 https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12939
Wang X, Shujaat S, Meeus J Performance of novice versus experienced surgeons for dental implant placement with freehand, static guided and dynamic navigation approaches. Sci Rep. 2023; 13 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-29633-6
Revilla-León M, Gómez-Polo M, Vyas S Artificial intelligence applications in implant dentistry: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2023; 129:293-300 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.05.008
Dental implantology has revolutionized the dental profession by providing a practical and aesthetically pleasing replacement for lost or missing teeth. This article takes a comprehensive look at the history of dental implantology from the discovery of osseo-integration to the current practice of using conventional to zygomatic implants with bone grafts and soft tissue grafts.
CPD/Clinical Relevance: Knowledge regarding the current status of dental implants is of value to clinicians.
Article
Dental implantology has revolutionized the dental profession by providing a practical and aesthetically pleasing replacement for lost or missing teeth. Today, implants are a routine therapeutic modality with a survival rate of over 95%.1 Dental implantology with titanium has come a long way since its inception in the 1960s when Professor Per-Ingvar Brånemark first reported the phenomenon of osseo-integration. This article takes a comprehensive look at the history of dental implantology from the discovery of osseo-integration to the current practice of using conventional to zygomatic implants with bone grafts and soft tissue grafts.
In the 1950s, Professor Per-Ingvar Brånemark, an orthopaedic surgeon from Sweden, was studying bone healing and regeneration using titanium. In one of his experiments, he inserted a titanium chamber inside a rabbit’s femur to understand how the bone regenerates. However, when he attempted to remove the chamber, he found that it had fused with the bone in such a way that it was impossible to remove. From this observation, he realized that titanium could be integrated into live bone tissue.2
Register now to continue reading
Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits: