References

Loe H, Theilade E, Jensen SB Experimental gingivitis in man. J Periodontol. 1965; 36:177-187
Theilade E, Wright WH, Jensen SB, Loe H Experimental gingivitis in man. II. A longitudinal clinical and bacteriological investigation. J Periodontal Res. 1966; 1:1-13
Loe H, Anerud A, Boysen H, Morrison E Natural history of periodontal disease in man. Rapid, moderate and no loss of attachment in Sri Lankan laborers 14 to 46 years of age. J Clin Periodontol. 1986; 13:431-445
Genco RJ, Borgnakke WS Risk factors for periodontal disease. Periodontol 2000. 2013; 62:59-94
Lancet. 2009; 373:(9657)
Baelum V, van Palenstein HW, Hugoson A, Yee R, Fejerskov O A global perspective on changes in the burden of caries and periodontitis: implications for dentistry. J Oral Rehabil. 2007; 34:(12)872-906
Kassebaum NJ, Bernabé E, Dahiya M, Bhandari B, Murray CJ, Marcenes W Global burden of severe periodontitis in 1990–2010: a systematic review and meta-regression. J Dent Res. 2014; 93:(11)1045-1053
Rosling B, Serino G, Hellstrom MK, Socransky SS, Lindhe J Longitudinal periodontal tissue alterations during supportive therapy. Findings from subjects with normal and high susceptibility to periodontal disease. J Clin Periodontol. 2001; 28:241-249
Preventive behaviour and risks to oral health – a report from the Adult Dental Health Survey 2009. 2011.
Loe H, Schiott CR The effect of mouthrinses and topical application of chlorhexidine on the development of dental plaque and gingivitis in man. J Periodontal Res. 1970; 5:79-83
Van Strydonck DA, Slot DE, Van der Velden U, Van der Weijden F Effect of a chlorhexidine mouthrinse on plaque, gingival inflammation and staining in gingivitis patients: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2012; 39:(11)1042-1055
Jones CG Chlorhexidine: is it still the gold standard?. Periodontol 2000. 1997; 15:55-62
Hoffmann T, Bruhn G, Richter S, Netuschil L, Brecx M Clinical controlled study on plaque and gingivitis reduction under long-term use of low-dose chlorhexidine solutions in a population exhibiting good oral hygiene. Clin Oral Investig. 2001; 5:89-95
Leyes Borrajo JL, Garcia VL, Lopez CG, Rodriguez-Nuñez I, Garcia FM, Gallas TM Efficacy of chlorhexidine mouthrinses with and without alcohol: a clinical study. J Periodontol. 2002; 73:317-321
Loe H, Schiott CR, Karring G, Karring T Two years oral use of chlorhexidine in man. I. General design and clinical effects. J Periodontal Res. 1976; 11:135-144
Lang NP, Hase JC, Grassi M, Hammerle CH, Weigel C, Kelty E Plaque formation and gingivitis after supervised mouthrinsing with 0.2% delmopinol hydrochloride, 0.2% chlorhexidine digluconate and placebo for 6 months. Oral Dis. 1998; 4:105-113
Addy M Oral hygiene products: potential for harm to oral and systemic health?. Periodontol 2000. 2008; 48:54-65
Segreto VA, Collins EM, Beiswanger BB, Delarosa M, Isaacs RL, Lang NP A comparison of mouthrinses containing 2 concentrations of chlorhexidine. J Periodontal Res. 1986; 21:23-32
Van der Weijden GA, Ten Heggeler JM, Slot DE, Rosema NA, Van der Velden U Parotid gland swelling following mouthrinse use. Int J Dent Hyg. 2010; 8:276-279
Pemberton MN, Gibson J Chlorhexidine and hypersensitivity reactions in dentistry. Br Dent J. 2012; 213:(11)547-550
Barkvoll P, Rolla G, Svendsen K Interaction between chlorhexidine digluconate and sodium lauryl sulfate in vivo. J Clin Periodontol. 1989; 16:593-595
Kato T, Iijima H, Ishihara K, Kaneko T, Hirai K, Naito Y Antibacterial effects of Listerine on oral bacteria. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 1990; 31:301-307
Gunsolley JC A meta-analysis of six-month studies of antiplaque and antigingivitis agents. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006; 137:1649-1657
van Leeuwen MPC, Slot DE, Van der Weijden GA Essential oils compared to chlorhexidine with respect to plaque and parameters of gingival inflammation: a systematic review. J Periodontol. 2011; 82:174-194
Marchetti E, Mummolo S, Di Mattia J, Casalena F, Di Martino S, Mattei A, Marzo G Efficacy of essential oil mouthwash with and without alcohol: a 3-Day plaque accumulation model. Trials. 2011; 12
Sharma NC, Charles CH, Qaqish JG, Galustians HJ, Zhao Q, Kumar LD Comparative effectiveness of an essential oil mouthrinse and dental floss in controlling interproximal gingivitis and plaque. Am J Dent. 2002; 15:351-355
Bauroth K, Charles CH, Mankodi SM, Simmons K, Zhao Q, Kumar LD The efficacy of an essential oil antiseptic mouthrinse vs. dental floss in controlling interproximal gingivitis: a comparative study. J Am Dent Assoc. 2003; 134:359-365
Finkelstein P, Yost KG, Grossman E Mechanical devices versus antimicrobial rinses in plaque and gingivitis reduction. Clin Prev Dent. 1990; 12:8-11
Adams D, Addy M Mouthrinses. Adv Dent Res. 1994; 8:291-301
Roberts WR, Addy M Comparison of the in vivo and in vitro antibacterial properties of antiseptic mouthrinses containing chlorhexidine, alexidine, cetyl pyridinium chloride and hexetidine. Relevance to mode of action. J Clin Periodontol. 1981; 8:295-310
Haps S, Slot DE, Berchier CE, Van der Weijden GA The effect of cetylpyridinium chloride-containing mouth rinses as adjuncts to toothbrushing on plaque and parameters of gingival inflammation: a systematic review. Int J Dent Hyg. 2008; 6:290-303
Addy M, Moran J, Newcombe RG Meta-analyses of studies of 0.2% delmopinol mouth rinse as an adjunct to gingival health and plaque control measures. J Clin Periodontol. 2007; 34:58-65
Hase JC, Edwardsson S, Rundegren J, Attström R, Kelty E 6-month use of 0.2% delmopinol hydrochloride in comparison with 0.2% chlorhexidine digluconate and placebo (II). Effect on plaque and salivary microflora. J Clin Periodontol. 1998; 25:(11 Pt 1)841-849
Zanatta FB, Antoniazzi RP, Rösing CK The effect of 0.12% chlorhexidine digluconate rinsing on previously plaque-covered surfaces: a randomized, controlled clinical trial. J Periodontol. 2007; 78:2127-2134
Pan PC, Harper S, Ricci-Nittel D, Lux R, Shi W In vitro evidence for efficacy of antimicrobial mouthrinses. J Dent. 2010; 38:16-20
Robinson C Mass transfer of therapeutics through natural human plaque biofilms: a model for therapeutic delivery to pathological bacterial biofilms. Arch Oral Biol. 2011; 56:829-836
Moran JM Home-use oral hygiene products: mouthrinses. Periodontol. 2000 2008; 48:42-53
Neely AL Essential oil mouthwash (EOMW) may be equivalent to chlorhexidine (CHX) for long-term control of gingival inflammation but CHX appears to perform better than EOMW in plaque control. J Evid Base Dent Pract. 2011; 11:171-174

Mouthwashes: do they work and should we use them? part 1: antiplaque efficacy of mouthwashes

From Volume 43, Issue 6, July 2016 | Pages 536-544

Authors

Penny Hodge

BDS, PhD, FDS RCS(Ed)

Specialist Periodontist/Honorary Senior Lecturer, University of Glasgow, 378 Sauchiehall Street, Glasgow G2 3JZ, UK

Articles by Penny Hodge

Abstract

This article will focus on the antiplaque efficacy of mouthwashes. An antiplaque agent inhibits the formation of plaque and also reduces gingivitis. There is good evidence that chlorhexidine digluconate, used in the correct concentrations, is the gold standard agent against which all others should be measured. It does, however, have some unwanted side-effects. One of the major problems for antiplaque mouthwashes is that they have a much reduced effect on established plaque within the oral environment. Although they can flow into the biofilm channels and kill bacteria in the superficial layers of dental plaque, they cannot penetrate the biomass and inhibit the pathogenic bacteria adjacent to the tooth surface and gingival margin. There is no evidence that they prevent the progression of periodontitis.

CPD/Clinical Relevance: The evidence supporting the use of ‘over the counter’ antiplaque mouthwashes is evaluated. This provides guidance for dentists and dental care professionals of when it is appropriate to recommend mouthwash use to their patients.

Article

There are various reasons why a patient may wish to use a mouthwash. These include:

A member of the dental profession might consider recommending the use of a mouthwash as an antiplaque agent, to deliver topical fluoride, to combat oral malodour or for a patient with a dry mouth. For members of the public the array of mouthwashes available and the claims made by manufacturers can be confusing. A newspaper article raised the question ‘Mouthwash or hogwash: experts argue that not only is a mouthwash useless, it can also be harmful to your health' (Times newspaper 15 September 2008). The aim of this series of papers is to review the available evidence for the efficacy of ‘over the counter’ mouthwashes and to give guidance for dentists and dental care professionals of when it is appropriate to recommend mouthwash use to their patients.

Evidence regarding mouthwashes may be divided into:

This narrative review will be split into three parts. The first part will focus on antiplaque efficacy of mouthwashes. The second part will address caries prevention, antihalitosis efficacy and dry mouth relief. The third part will cover safety of mouthwashes.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available