References

Smith BG, Bartlett DW, Robb ND. The prevalence, etiology and management of tooth wear in the United Kingdom. J Prosthet Dent. 1997; 78:(4)367-372
Burke FM, McKenna G. Toothwear and the older patient. Dent Update. 2011; 38:(3)165-168
Milosevic A, Brodie DA, Slade PD. Dental erosion, oral hygiene, and nutrition in eating disorders. Int J Eat Disord. 1997; 21:(2)195-199
Blacker SM, Chadwick RG. An in vitro investigation of the erosive potential of smoothies. Br Dent J. 2013; 214:(4)
Touyz LZ. The acidity (pH) and buffering capacity of Canadian fruit juice and dental implications. J Can Dent Assoc. 1994; 60:(5)454-458
Salas MM, Nascimento GG, Huysmans MC, Demarco FF. Estimated prevalence of erosive tooth wear in permanent teeth of children and adolescents: an epidemiological systematic review and meta-regression analysis. J Dent. 2015; 43:(1)42-50
Hara AT, Zero DT. The potential of saliva in protecting against dental erosion. Monogr Oral Sci. 2014; 25:197-205
: The Health and Social Care Information Centre; 2011
Bartlett DW, Lussi A, West NX, Bouchard P, Sanz M, Bourgeois D. Prevalence of tooth wear on buccal and lingual surfaces and possible risk factors in young European adults. J Dent. 2013; 41:(11)1007-1013
Smith BG, Knight JK. An index for measuring the wear of teeth. Br Dent J. 1984; 156:(12)435-438
Bardsley PF. The evolution of tooth wear indices. Clin Oral Invest. 2008; 12:S15-S19
Bartlett D, Ganss C, Lussi A. Basic Erosive Wear Examination (BEWE): a new scoring system for scientific and clinical needs. Clin Oral Invest. 2008; 12:S65-S68
Donachie MA, Walls AW. The tooth wear index: a flawed epidemiological tool in an ageing population group. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1996; 24:(2)152-158
Kidd EA, Smith BG. Toothwear histories: a sensitive issue. Dent Update. 1993; 20:(4)174-178
Lagerweij MD, Buchalla W, Kohnke S, Becker K, Lennon AM, Attin T. Prevention of erosion and abrasion by a high fluoride concentration gel applied at high frequencies. Caries Res. 2006; 40:(2)148-153
Bartlett DW. Retrospective long term monitoring of tooth wear using study models. Br Dent J. 2003; 194:(4)211-213
Berry DC, Poole DF. Attrition: possible mechanisms of compensation. J Oral Rehab. 1976; 3:(3)201-206
Dahl BL, Krogstad O, Karlsen K. An alternative treatment in cases with advanced localized attrition. J Oral Rehab. 1975; 2:(3)209-214
Gulamali AB, Hemmings KW, Tredwin CJ, Petrie A. Survival analysis of composite Dahl restorations provided to manage localised anterior tooth wear (ten year follow-up). Br Dent J. 2011; 211:(4)
Al-Khayatt AS, Ray-Chaudhuri A, Poyser NJ, Briggs PF, Porter RW, Kelleher MG Direct composite restorations for the worn mandibular anterior dentition: a 7-year follow-up of a prospective randomised controlled split-mouth clinical trial. J Oral Rehab. 2013; 40:(5)389-401
Evans RD. Orthodontics and the creation of localised inter-occlusal space in cases of anterior tooth wear. Eur J Prosthodont Rest Dent. 1997; 5:(4)169-173
Saha S, Summerwill AJ. Reviewing the concept of Dahl. Dent Update. 2004; 31:(8)442-447

Worn down by toothwear? aetiology, diagnosis and management revisited

From Volume 42, Issue 6, July 2015 | Pages 525-532

Authors

Pamela L Yule

BDS, MFDS RCPS(Glasg)

Specialty Registrar and Associate Clinical Lecturer in Restorative Dentistry, Newcastle Dental Hospital, Richardson Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AZ, UK

Articles by Pamela L Yule

Stewart C Barclay

Consultant in Restorative Dentistry

Articles by Stewart C Barclay

Abstract

The incidence of toothwear in the population is increasing, as is the number of referrals regarding this problem to secondary care dental hospital consultants and specialists. This paper outlines current theories in aetiology, diagnosis and management of localized and generalized toothwear, as well as describing clinical tips for assessing such patients.

CPD/Clinical Relevance: Clinicians will gain a better understanding of how to address the problem of toothwear and what can be achieved in primary care and secondary care settings.

Article

It is accepted that a degree of toothwear occurs naturally with age. Excessive toothwear, however, can be exceedingly damaging; causing painful symptoms, poor aesthetics or problems with eating and speech. Anecdotal evidence suggests that patients are increasingly presenting with problems of toothwear both in primary and secondary care settings. This article describes the aetiology, diagnosis and treatment options for toothwear and aims to help clinicians manage patients with this condition.

Toothwear can be defined as ‘the loss of tooth substance by means other than caries or dental trauma’. Tooth surface loss (TSL) is an alternative term used which can confuse dentists and patients, and can understate the severity of the problem by implying that only the surface of the tooth is lost.1 The term toothwear is easy for patients to understand, which is very important, as successful management of the condition depends on the patient's understanding of the wear process and its aetiological factors. There are different types of toothwear which can occur in isolation but which more commonly occur in combination:

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available